The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Journal of Free Speech Law: "Hate Speech, Holy Prophets, and Human Rights: The Struggle for Free Speech from 1945–2021,"
by Jacob Mchangama (Justitia), Heini Skorini (Univ. of Faroe Islands) & Mathias Meier (Justitia).
Just published, at 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 675 (2022); here's the Abstract:
This article examines how the right to freedom of expression in international human rights law has been a constant source of conflict and political power struggles since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948. Applying both the UN arena as well as the Helsinki Process as institutional frameworks, the article examines how prohibitions against hate speech, incitement to hatred, blasphemy, and related legal restrictions have served as a recurrent source of conflict in international diplomacy and in the making of international free speech norms in the postwar period. From the drafting history of the UDHR and the subsequent International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to the Helsinki Final Act and contemporary UN resolutions, the article provides an overview and outlines some of the main conflicts and issues regarding the right to communicate freely about cultural, religious, and political issues in the postwar period.
Censorship and repression predate debates surrounding the prohibition of hate speech in international human rights law. And while authoritarian states are likely to use such methods to punish dissent regardless of international standards, this article nonetheless argues that obligations to ban specific categories of speech under human rights law provide formal legitimacy, or at least a façade of legitimacy, to authoritarian restrictions of free expression.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Didn't read the whole article, but CTRL-F shows it gave short shrift to Art. 20(1) of the UN's Civil and Political Rights convention: "Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law."
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
What does this mean? Does "any" include supporting a UN peacekeeping operation? Or wars of self-defense? What if there's dispute over whether the war is just?
Is propaganda against war valid? One would imagine so.
But then, is Ukrainian propaganda against the Russian invasion valid, or is it taken as propaganda for the Ukrainian defense?
Ah, here's the story I was looking for -
"German States Will Prosecute Speech That Supports the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
"Several German states have announced they will prosecute those who publicly display the letter Z in support of Russia."
https://reason.com/2022/04/07/german-states-will-prosecute-speech-that-supports-the-russian-invasion-of-ukraine/
Ha! I'd forgotten about that. Governments do so many stupid things, it's hard to keep track.
Half the commentators on Fox, strong men lickspittles, better not go to Germany.
The German government, which has a large contingent of crypto-Nazis that get genocidal jollies from racial supremacist Zionist colonial settler oppression of Palestinians, forcefully suppress pro-Palestine speech.
Look, it's antisemitic Mad Libs!
Look! The white racist Zionist legal nitwit denies the obvious facts of German anti-Palestinian crypto-Nazism: How Palestine became a ‘forbidden word’ in German high schools.
Since the 1920s the US Zionist movement has tried to suppress speech that is opposed to Zionist genocide against Palestinians.
A large component of moderation by a major social medium platform consists of discrimination against pro-Palestine content and a pro-Palestine user.
It's my "human right" to have you arrested because I don't like what you said!!!
By that (twisted) logic, the guy who stabbed Salman Rushdie is a “human rights activist”!
compare:
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/02/harvard-graduate-sobs-fired-dream-job-threatening-stab-lives-matter-supporters-12934921/