The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Vogue on KBJ and ACB
Contrast how the fashion magazine treats the two newest members of the Supreme Court.
The September issue of Vogue Magazine is a big deal. In the past, the publisher would boast of how loud a "thud" it made when dropped off a coffee table. The cover of the September 2022 issue announces Serena Williams' retirement. And inside the issue is a profile of the newest member of the Court, titled The Grace and Promise of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Legendary photographer Annie Leibovitz (who just finished snapping the Zelenskys in Ukraine) took two pictures of Justice Jackson. Both shots are taken at the Lincoln Memorial at dawn.
In the first shot, Jackson is seen in front of the reflecting pool, wearing an "Aliétte coat." In the second shot, Jackson is leaning against a column with Lincoln in the background, wearing an "Oscar de la Renta coat and dress."
United States Supreme Court Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C., 2022 / For @voguemagazine pic.twitter.com/5jMI3KwIbc
— Annie Leibovitz (@annieleibovitz) August 16, 2022
(I understand there is some dissatisfaction that a white photographer (Leibovitz) took the shots of Jackson.)
For those curious, Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not receive a glowing profile in Vogue. Nor did the magazine send Leibovitz to South Bend. Indeed, the first article in Vogue about Barrett is titled. "Does Amy Coney Barrett Believe Life Begins at Fertilization?" The photo is not the most flattering.
Does Amy Coney Barrett Believe Life Begins at Fertilization? https://t.co/oUgT0fBaMI
— MrKW (@4MrKW) October 17, 2020
In the wake of Dobbs, I've written a lot about judicial courage. The five members of the majority knew full well that their vote would ostracize them from elite society for the rest of their lives. Had any of them changed their vote, and saved Roe, they would be feted as saviors. A glossy spread in Vogue. Honorary degrees. Grand Marshall at the Rose Bowl parade (an honor Justice O'Connor received). But by sticking to their guns, and the law, they will receive none of these accolades. Good. Really, good riddance to these progressive efforts to manipulate the Justices. The Greenhouse Effect is long gone.
Which brings me back to Justice Jackson. We often speak of the cult of celebrity Justices. This obsession affected Justice Ginsburg's judgment, and likely dissuaded her from retiring. Judges, even those on the left, should resist the siren call of becoming pop icons. Yet, in this glamorous photo shoot, Justice Jackson models couture clothing. I know this was not her intent, but Jackson has become an unofficial spokesperson for Oscar De La Renta and Aliétte. Fame can quickly go to a person's head. And it never ends well for anyone, especially judges.
Finally, was the Lincoln Monument closed to the public for this shoot? Even with an early morning shoot run, there is usually someone on your left.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The magazine was correct to celebrate Jackson, the first black woman on the Court, and correct to criticize Barrett, who belongs to a male supremacist organization and has a view of women’s rights (or lack thereof) which is at odds with its readers’.
Barrett is a conservative babe. She has also fulfilled all feminist aspirations.
Jackson is a hideous leftist churl.
This proves the theory that the Left is ugly people taking their revenge on a nation that mistreated them.
Look at the people on MSNBC. All are ugly enough to crack the TV screen. They should not be on TV, a visual medium. Take the message to the radio.
that Katy Tur's not so bad (she does look like a Muppet), if you just don't think about her (Redacted) Keith Olberman, . Hallie Jackson has some DSL's, And Laurie Dhue was pretty sexy, that was back when PMS-NBC still had some balance with Don Imus, Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck (none very sexy).
Katie is chesty and great until she opens her mouth, then she is insufferable.
Show us your beautiful face so I can judge if your words can be taken seriously.
Does Judge Jackson know she's a woman? And you can't just throw out a stupid phrase like "Male Supremericist Oraganization" without saying something equally as stupid to back it up, for example, "Senator Robert KKK Bird was a grand Kleagle in the Ku Klux Klan"
Frank
God first comment and dumb as crap.
You whine about bigotry yet your first sentence is praise based entirely on skin color? lol. (okay to be fair the hidden expectation is that she should also by extension by leftwing which is also racist but still)
“The magazine reflected perfectly my political bias, so they were correct.”
How wonderfully insightful and persuasive!
Vogue is just NYC trash people. Teen Vogue is all grooming, all butt banging, all the time, no more fashion and dating tips. The models are now really hideous and ugly freaks and churls, more suitable for medical books about anomalies. Just dismissed, a repulsive shit magazine from a shithole city.
The bigger problem is culture of Washington DC. Barrett will be Kennedied after living in the rent seeking capital of the nation for 2 years.
The Supreme Court must be moved to Wichita KS, in a new Judiciary Act.
Maybe you have to be a liberal to get the weird, celebrity, quasi-hero worship. K-town is all about leaving determinations like that to qualified professionals and I'm going to have to agree with this one.
She's black, woman and most important communist, oops I mean liberal or progressive or something
"Maybe you have to be a liberal to get the weird, celebrity, quasi-hero worship."
Are you saying all the people hanging on the every word of God-Emperor Trump are liberals?
Unfortunately, celebrity worship of politicians is very much a bipartisan disease.
Well life does begin at fertilization. If you don't "believe" that you're a moron. So Vogue = moron. Where else would it begin?
All you've illustrated by saying that "life does begin at fertilization" is that it's a nonsense question. Life didn't "begin" there because the sperm and egg cells were themselves already alive (at least, as alive as the plants you mention below). Life "began" with the first living creature and has been continuous ever since.
What you are really trying to say is that independent life begins at fertilization - and that's not an obvious statement at all. Independent life could just as easily be defined as birth (really 'when the umbilical cord is cut') or viability ('when the umbilical cord could be cut). But older societies defined it even later - weaning or even the end of childhood when you could truly be independent.
To dismiss everyone who disagrees with you as "a moron" says a lot more about your mental acuity than it does about theirs.
Viability? Being able to survive independent from the mother?
Why would it begin at fertilization? Because that's when the Bible says "God breathes life" into someone and their soul attaches? That's just imposing your own religious beliefs onto others.
Some conservatives criticize the “elite crowd” but secretly crave their approval. Trump is the obvious example; Josh might be another. Secretly they would prize nothing more than a glowing tribute by the New York Times (Trump) or an Ivy League chair (Josh). It is motivated by a sense of inferiority. Trump deep down knows that he is stupid, lazy, incompetent, immature and just not good enough. Josh is not stupid and certainly not lazy but there is something of the same dynamic, his outsized ego and the way he keeps tooting his own horn.
I don’t get that impression from Barrett. She may have been raised in a conservative test tube and buys into this Catholic male headship business, and must realize that she was put onto the Court via sleazy means, but I get the sense she is confident in her abilities. She is a secure woman who has never courted the elite crowd (obviously) and doesn’t need it now. Facing their disapproval isn’t “courage”. It’s simply the way she feels.
You’re just making shit up about people you don’t know. Completely fabricated psycho babble.
Trump obsessively follows the "liberal" media, and comments on it constantly. Josh obsessively follows "prestige" publications and scholars, ditto. There's a reason.
First Prof. Manta and dating advice, and now Prof. Blackman with Vogue updates.
Can anybody suggest any other law blogs which are a little more on topic?
Now wait a minute - Justice Brewer constantly cited Godey's Lady's Book in his opinions.
(source: some stuff I made up)
I read the repetitive contributions of Profs. Blackman and Volokh, review the predictable comments provided by this blog's cultivated collection of followers, consider that this white, male blog is likely the best right-wing legal academia can muster these days, and -- on behalf of the winning side of the culture war and the right side of history -- I am content.
Carry on, clingers. Thanks for the laughs.
Maybe Associate Justice Jackson would have been wiser to refuse the request to appear for this photo shoot. Same with Associate Justice Ginsburg.
Wow.
What a load from Blackman.
Kind of a petty article and looks like snowflake whining. Maybe something from a high school blog.
TIL that people still read that magazine or consider what it prints is newsworthy
_The Federalist_ should do a photoshoot of Blackman as compensation.
You suck! 🙂
Congratulations Professor Blackman! Once again your trite, whiny drivel managed to bring out the worst, dumbest, most hateful and bigoted denizens of V.C. Now, for your next trick, can you get them to retreat to their basements?
"This obsession affected Justice Ginsburg's judgment, and likely dissuaded her from retiring. "
Thanks Ruth! Unborn babies salute you!
The funny thing is that the pictures are just not very good. The lighting on the one on the left [standing next to the pillar] is horrific.
Leibovitz may be the most famous photographer but is just not very good.
I have long agreed with that. She's been "phoning it in" for years.
To be fair to Leibovitz, taking an image from a print publication and putting it on a computer monitor is hardly the most accurate way to show it.
And of course that's just the beginning. Monitors vary enormously in all sorts of ways.
That seems like a tendentious (to put it charitably) characterization of the linked criticism of the terrible photographs.
How is it tendentious? The linked article says "the latest photo proves yet again that she doesn’t know how to use proper lighting when shooting Black people.", and includes a tweet that says "You CAN recommend talented Black photographers who will do better than you." Seems pretty clear that it was suggesting a black photographer should have done the shoot,
Good lord. Mr. Manager is just pathetic.
> good riddance to these progressive efforts to manipulate the Justices
So criticism is "manipulation", and praise is just that.
The thing is, I suspect Hairboy honestly can't see how ridiculous this is. Sad.
This is below you, Josh.
William Rhenquist added gold stripes to his robe because he wanted extra notoriety/fame/stature for being the Chief. Not that being Chief is anything more than an accident of timing.
Nino Scalia famously courted nearly any high society speaking engagement. And led the NYC Columbus Day parade.
Yes, Vogue has a point of view. They are entitled. But let's dispense with the "only liberal justices seek notoriety" nonsense.
I remember the gold stripes when he presided over the Clinton impeachment and thought he added them then. Was he wearing them before 1998?
That’s not why Rehnquist wore the gold stripes. He wire them because he saw them in an opera and thought they looked cool.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-jan-08-mn-61733-story.html
If I’m not mistaken, he tried to get the other Justices to wear them too, but they declined.
His old boss, Nixon, tried to put his White House security guards in white, gold-braided "palatial" uniforms. It did not go over well.
I rather liked the gold stripes. Nixon's guard uniforms were too much.
“This is below you, Josh.”
It really really really isn’t.
How many articles in Vogue have used the word "eukaryote"?
Many debates -- and many Vogue articles -- are matters of political opinion, not scientific fact. "Hey, check out Vogue's new profiles of Kenneth Kidd and Craig Venter (wearing a sleek DKNY coat)" is not an exclamation often heard. Discussion of serious topics and definitions of fundamental concepts _must_ be dumbed-down by Vogue authors (and by blog posters) -- how else can the under-educated "urban" masses be introduced to that which must be fully understood by those responsible for the care for such "urban" masses? A zookeeper does not read textbooks to his charges. What non-Vogue mechanism can simultaneously satiate the hubris of the "urban" masses while nourishing their nascent percipience?
It is the duty and burden of the White Man -- and Vogue -- to make sure that the people who sit in darkness see the Great Light! "When a man wants to murder a tiger he calls it sport; when a tiger wants to murder him, he calls it ferocity."
I am new here. Did Josh Blackman complain that Vogue magazine didn't place Melania on the cover during her tenure? It's obvious he is not immune to political bias. Hilarious.
Blackman talking about fame and celebrity is droll.
He seems to have a bit of an obsession with Barrett.
Anyway, wtf is it his business what Vogue writes about who? There was plenty of derogatory stuff written about Jackson, and gushing over Barrett, elsewhere.
Did Josh complain about that?
So what's the big fucking deal here?
In the wake of Dobbs, I've written a lot about judicial courage. The five members of the majority knew full well that their vote would ostracize them from elite society for the rest of their lives. Had any of them changed their vote, and saved Roe, they would be feted as saviors. A glossy spread in Vogue. Honorary degrees. Grand Marshall at the Rose Bowl parade (an honor Justice O'Connor received). But by sticking to their guns, and the law, they will receive none of these accolades. Good. Really, good riddance to these progressive efforts to manipulate the Justices. The Greenhouse Effect is long gone.
You know what, Josh? You're completely full of shit. No one tries to influence conservative Justices, who stand firm and true to the law? What a load of crap.
Courage? Ostracized? Fuck off. They ruled the way everyone knew they were going to rule the moment they were nominated. They didn't take some brave stand, and they won't be ostracized from their associates.
Instead, to use your word,they will be, are being, praised lavishly by those whose praise they value. And by you, too.
This is a bottom ten post by you, and that's saying something.
Why is the statue of Lincoln bathed in light while the Justice is off in a corner in very bad light?
I mean, they literally showed her in a bad light.
And they're valorizing a white man. Did you know Lincoln hanged a bunch of Native Americans?
That Blackman offers this stuff -- after his coverage of Justice Alito's performance as a fundraiser for the Federalist Society and as a blatant spokesman for an organization that systematically facilitated and concealed sexual abuse of children to protect its opulent assets, criminal personnel, and fading reputation (and preaches bigotry) -- is great!
Keep up the good work, clingers! I like an adversary who makes it easier for reason, modernity, education, science, and inclusiveness to win the culture war over superstition, backwardness, ignorance, dogma, and bigotry.
You must be related to Johnny One-Note.
My single note responds to Prof. Blackman's single note.
And to Prof. Volokh's single note.
If they provided better material, my responses might improve.
But their fans seem to want the predictable, repetitive, low-grade red meat, and this white, male, right-wing blog tosses it.
Carry on, clingers.
Maybe the majority justices voted the way they did because they knew "their vote would ostracize them from elite society for the rest of their lives." Turning down all those invitations to stuffy cocktail parties must get tedious.
Actually, this fashioning looks good. Besides, I want to joun here too. You know, I wear it when choosing clothes for myself and recently I found out vegan briefcases and it's a surprise for me, because I like to buy all the products. In general, it's cool to buy something new.
Queenie. Great comment, bruh. I looked at a few issues, and had to stop, being nauseated. See you next Tuesday.
Teen Vogue's got some hotties, umm, my daughters used to read it, so I had to check it out, make sure there were umm, no "Inappropriate" articles.
You're dumb
Conciousness and sentience aren't necessary for something to be alive. Unless you actually believe that plants are just fancy rocks.
Sleepy Joe?? neither (Conscious or Sentient, I'd throw "Lucid" in there too)
The most nauseating part of Teen Vogue? The hideously ugly, and hostile models, with almost no more white ones. Makes you want to drop the issue in the trash, and run away. No make up advice, or teen idol insider articles.
https://www.teenvogue.com/news-politics
You may say, that was the politics section.
Here is the fashion section. Whoa.
https://www.teenvogue.com/fashion
"great" comment (Bee-Otch), as I'm Jewish and the grandson of a Horror-cost Survivor, so I'll let it go, and just attribute it to your Perinatal anoxic-ischemic brain injury, you really should have been aborted.
Frank
what's wrong with that? who wants a Black Hostile Chick? (is that redundant?) and there's a joke about why Black Dudes don't like Connie-Lingus, but it's too risque for this August "Conspiracy"
Queenie, I could never be involved with any young woman. They would get addicted to me, and want to have a child. Average time to in person meeting to bed is under 15 minutes. They all say, coffee, walk on the beach. I say OK. They arrive, no coffee, no walk on the beach.
One nice thing about cis females? No monkey.
Your daughters must be really old, and cis white. I do not know what Teen Vogue looked like years ago. Here it is today. They would not recognize it. No cis whites anymore.
They also unfairly attack a good movie, Purple Hearts, directed by a female as military propaganda. It was not. It was just the Hallmark Channel but with intelligence.
https://www.teenvogue.com/entertainment
Queenie. I pray you do not get the monkey. Be careful out there, Honey.
"in this context people mean personhood"
No, it means being alive or, if you prefer, being human.
Queenie overcame tremendous adversity to reach this intellectually lofty rhetoric. It is so well spoken, so clean. I would love to see these comments in Ebonics.
see above, you're about as predictable as a beer fart.
I care about you, Queenie. Do not get the monkey out there. Perhaps I care too much.
32 and 29, Both Lefties (handedness, not political) like their old man, both Pilots (older Marine Corpse Reserve/Major Airline that rhymes with Delta younger USAF, but wants to fly for the IDF) strongly Hetero, although I've encouraged them to go Lesbo for career advancement if anything.
Its well known that left handers think differently than Righties, better at abstractions and 3 dimensions, while Righties get their anal sphincters all tight about stupid commas, capitals, apostrophe's, even Anesthesia's biased against lefties, larynoscopes all right handed, usually anesthesia machines on the right, forcing a lefty to use his non dominant hand, or reach the left across awkwardly, but don't get within range, cause I can throw a rock like a mofo (OK, being left handed did allow me to pitch with mediocre talent (but kept me from playing C, SS, 2B, 3B) Lefties are the last Minority group waiting to get "liberated" and talk about self loathing, even Lefty Barry Hussein O didn't do anything about it,
Frank