The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
New Wave of Russian Emigration is an Opportunity for the West - but one we Seem Likely to Flub
Opening the door to Russians fleeing Putin is the right thing to do on both moral and pragmatic grounds.

Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine and accompanying increase in repression within Russia itself kicked off a wave of Russian emigration, in addition to a massive flow of refugees from Ukraine. As a recent CNBC article explains, the initial wave has now been augmented by additional people, many of them skilled professionals in high tech and related fields:
Vladimir, whose surname has been removed due to the sensitive nature of the situation, is part of what he considers Russia's "second wave" of migration following the war. This includes those who took longer to prepare to leave the country — such as people with businesses or families who wanted to let their children finish the school year before leaving….
A "first wave" of artists, journalists and others openly opposed to Putin's regime felt they had to leave the country immediately or risk political persecution for violating the Kremlin's clampdown on public dissent.
"A lot of people got notices saying that they were traitors," said Jeanne Batalova, senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute….
But as the war rages on, more Russians are deciding to pack up and leave.
"The way migration works is that once the flow begins and people start finding out how to do things — get a flat, apply for asylum, find a job or start a business — that prompts more people to leave. It becomes a self-fulfilling cycle," Batalova said….
There is no concrete data on the number of Russians who have left the country since the start of the war. However, one Russian economist put the total at 200,000 as of mid-March.
That figure is likely to be far higher now, according to Batalova, as tens of thousands of Russians have relocated to Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Israel, the Baltic states and beyond….
In the tech sector alone, an estimated 50,000 to 70,000 professionals left in the first month of the war, with a further 70,000 to 100,000 expected to follow soon thereafter, according to a Russian IT industry trade group.…
The tech sector is one among several professional services industries that have seen an exodus of talent from Russia's larger cities, as people reject the war and worsening business conditions.
Scott Antel, an international hospitality and franchise lawyer who spent almost two decades working in Moscow, has so far this year helped five friends relocate from Russia to Dubai, in several cases purchasing properties for them, sight unseen, to expedite the move.
"You're seeing a massive brain drain," said Antel, whose departing friends span the legal and consulting professions, as well as hospitality and real estate. "The disruption for talented people is enormous and is going to be even more so."
This outflow represents a major opportunity for the West. For reasons I have outlined in detail before (see here, here, and here), opening our doors to Russians fleeing Putin is the right thing to do for a combination of moral, economic, and strategic grounds. Morally, it is wrong to keep out people fleeing an increasingly oppressive tyranny. Economically, we could use the extra production and innovation these immigrants can provide - especially since they are disproportionately professionals in science and high tech. Strategically, this can impose a "brain drain" on Putin's war machine, and strengthen our hand in the war of ideas against the authoritarian nationalism of Russia and China (a point American policymakers readily understood during the Cold War, when they welcomed refugees from communist states). The possible risk of espionage by Russian migrants is low and can be addressed by measures other than exclusion.
If the US and other Western nations were to open their doors, the scale of migration might become even larger than it is now, as places like the US and Canada are likely to be more attractive destinations for many Russians, than the limited options currently available. In addition, many emigrant Russians - particularly those in scientific and tech fields - could potentially be more productive in the West than in the much poorer and less advanced nations that are the only available options for most today (if they have any options at all).
In earlier posts (see here and here), I have also addressed the argument that opening the door to Russian and Ukrainian refugees is unfair so long as the US and other Western nations are less open to those fleeing violence and tyranny elsewhere. For those who care about consistency, I have a long record of also advocating refuge for victims of war and and oppression from elsewhere in the world (see also this recent post about Chinese fleeing that country's brutal Covid lockdowns).
Sadly, the track record so far suggests the US and other Western nations are likely to miss this opportunity. Since Putin's invasion began in February, many states have become more open to Ukrainian refugees (though more remains to be done on this front). But very little has changed when it comes to Russians fleeing Putin.
In May, President Biden asked Congress to take the very limited step of authorizing Russians with a master's or doctoral degree in science, technology, engineering or mathematics to obtain a US visa without first getting an employer to sponsor them. But little seems to have come of this. And, obviously, in Russia -as in the West - many highly productive people - including in the tech industry - do not have or need graduate degrees. Others could get them after coming to the West rather than before. Other Western governments have also been dragging their feet on this issue.
Hopefully, Western governments will take more advantage of this obvious opportunity than they have so far. But I am not as hopeful as I wish could be.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just to add a practical note:
A friend runs a small software company. His biggest problem, by far, is finding good development staff.
Again, Ilya, the home address. All are to go to your street, so they can steal your windshield wipers. Crime is part of their upbringing and deep in their culture.
Tell your friend to offer better pay. Higher pay will lead to getting good development staff.
In the real world, labor pools may not be quite so elastic as your frictionless economic model may indicate.
Maybe if he expanded the reach - allowed people to work remotely and thus had a larger pool to draw on, then the price raising would be a good tactic. Though even then we're still having a nationwide labor shortage, so who knows. And that's assuming he is able to vet them right.
Hiring is hard; it's not so simple as 'pay them more! Zip zop!'
Oh wow.
What a suggestion!
Has it ever occurred to you that supply might not be real elastic in the short run, or are you too busy memorizing bromides?
Gosh.... The labor supply isn't "real elastic", so rather than hike up wages by 25% like you should do (10% of that just to account for inflation) we "have" to have foreign immigrants come in to work for the same low wage we've been providing.
I swear, "liberals" these days just want foreign labor to come in and work for cheap wages so rich bosses can keep the excess profits, rather than actually pay a reasonable wage.
This is why I switched to vote Republican more often. "Liberals" who don't actually work for the working class anymore.
So do you always put phrases in quotes when you don't understand what they mean, or their implications. Because that's a pretty transparent way to dodge dealing with the issue.
And pay at my friend's company has risen, partly because of inflation, partly for recruiting.
So to put it kindergarten terms - there aren't enough people around. Raising wages doesn't magically produce software developers overnight.
And if he did go up 25% or whatever he probably would able to hire more developers (though I'm not sure what would happen to the company financially) but he would be hiring them away from other companies, so the overall problem would still exist.
What it amounts to is this: there is more productive work for developers to do than there are developers to do it. And it takes a while for more to come through the pipeline.
You're a trollish moron.
He could also hire foreign ones right now (maybe not Russian ones, because of sanctions, but ones from other countries), if this were about driving down the wages of American developers.
Sorry, my putting "real elastic" into quotes was meant to point out the hypocrisy of you, a supposed liberal, arguing for the cheap immigrant labor.
Here's the deal. If you want more to hire good people...you pay them more. Sometimes, that means you hire them away from other companies. Then those companies have to raise their wages. That raises the wages of the entire field, which encourages more people to train in the field in the long run, increasing the wages of the middle class total.
OR you can act like "oh, we don't have enough people"....you can demand to hire cheap foreigners who will work for whatever. That results in wage suppression for the entire field, suppressing wage gains for decades for the middle class, to the benefit of the ultra-rich.
You ever see what a programmer actually gets paid as an entry level position on average? Look it up. Then look to see if they can actually afford to buy a house in California or where ever you live on that salary. They can't.
Here's the deal. Re-examine your priorities, and determine how your viewpoints are hurting the working class, if you're a supposed "liberal". Or don't.
Since this is a Somin article... may I suggest "foot capitalism"? If the labor pool your friend's company is in is not deep enough, surely they should be able (and willing) to pick-up the company and move to a more favorable environment?
And surely it is arrogance and hostility to local customs, and nothing more, to suggest that areas should improve themselves to be more welcoming to business and to have better labor pools?
Actually, my friend recruits nationally and has mostly remote workers, so that's not an issue. Indeed, offering remote work helps recruitment, as larger companies are less likely to do that.
Well there you have it, clearly America is the problem, and they should relocate to another nation. Trying to improve America is just arrogance and hostility!
"A friend runs a small software company. His biggest problem, by far, is finding good development staff."
He could pay ACTUAL market rates and not what he wishes they were.
You cannot profess support of the market and then work to undermine it when it does not move in the way you'd like.
As always, the general issue is that every one of Ilya's posts come out the same. More immigration better, no matter what.
There's no differentiation, no gradation. When every immigrant class is special, no one is special.
So, why let in these immigrants in particular? Why drive down the rates and salaries for computer programmers in the US? They don't make that much. Google puts their average salary at $63K a year in the US in 2020, right around the median household income.
Do you similarly applaud higher prices for groceries, gasoline, and rental housing?
I think much more likely than Somin-style open borders is Russia carries out Dmitry Medvedev's threat to nuke somebody and we retaliate with a blockade on Russia.
There is absolutely no chance the FSB will use this infiltrate their agents into the American tech sector.
There are millions of people employed in the American tech sector. Don't you think that the FSB can manage to bribe some of them for information without needing to sneak Russian emigres in?
Thousands of those are also Russian immigrants. I know about 10 personally.
What would Russia have the tech workers do? Ensure Trump beats Clinton?
Should we worry about German immigrants in the tech sector? What about Ukrainians, Swiss, or Sudanese?
"Should we worry about German immigrants in the tech sector? What about Ukrainians, Swiss, or Sudanese?"
All of the above. Our country's corpse is beimg picked apart.
How is our country's corpse being "picked apart?"
You do understand that these German, Ukrainian, Swiss, and Sudanese immigrants are in fact now Americans? I suppose a few hope to return to their countries of origin, but for the most part they are here, working, contributing to the economy, spending their earnings at American grocery stories, paying rent on American apartments, etc?
We are not an ethno-state.
Russia, China, etc. want to place people in jobs where they have access to (1) defense-related information, (2) interesting databases, (3) stealable technology, (4) source code to popular software with security flaws.
The Swiss, Sudanese, etc. do not have such lofty goals because they are not in competition with the United States for superpower status. (But I did enjoy the Swiss subplot of David Brin's _Earth_.)
Immigrants from these countries are not assumed to be spies. Quit that nationalist paranoia; people are people.
Also Russia is not in competition with the US for superpower status these days!
Protection of applied research and IP is absolutely a policy concern. But basic research is for publication anyhow, so that's quite safe.
Too many spy novels, John.
Why do you think a Russian would come to the US and engage in that sort of espionage? For the greater glory of Vladimir Putin, or Mother Russia?
No. For money. Just as a Swiss or German, or Sudanese, or American might.
Ilya is an open-borders extremist. There is literally nobody that he would choose to keep out of the country. Tomorrow's blog post: "Opening the door to Islamo-Fascists and al-Qaeda is the right thing to do on both moral and pragmatic grounds."
This comment is nothing but insult and ad hominem.
Even if you're right, that doesn't invalidate this particular post. Read it, and say where you think it went wrong. It's harder work than ranting at Prof. Somin, but it's also not a fallacy, and so might help you engage with the truth.
Says the quiet part out loud:
"In addition, many emigrant Russians - particularly those in scientific and tech fields - could potentially be more productive in the West than in the much poorer and less advanced nations that are the only available options for most today"
What's the issue? Scientific productivity performed in the US means US tech and small businesses started to develop said tech and all the other such things.
Would you rather such benefits stayed in Russia?
On one hand, there are some highly skilled Russian professionals who would be highly employable here and could find more beneficial work than Russian weapons development. On the other hand, during the Mariel Boatlift Castro did not send us his best. Would Putin?
Is the US Cuban community full of poor layabouts nowadays, or is it a vibrant and great part of America?
I don't think Putin is picking out who goes.
And this is not the Mariel boatlift.
Also, I learned from reading an article in Reason a year or two ago that the narrative of the Mariel boatlift is skewed from reality. Did Castro send some criminals here? Yes. Was that the bulk of the boatlift? No. (Also, that they were criminals in Cuba didn't mean that they had committed the sort of acts that we consider to be criminal here. Only about 1% of the people who came were real criminals.)
Ennis Cosby is against this.
What this brings to mind, for me, is how America's Manhattan Project would probably have lagged behind Germany's similar program if we had not accepted German scientists fleeing the country.
Which is to say, if Germany hadn't driven out some of it's best and brightest, and if America hadn't accepted as many as it did, then it's quite possible that Germany would have ended World War II by dropping a nuke on London.
With any luck, we are not in a situation that will have similarly dramatic outcomes, but the wisdom remains: if your enemy is driving out it's best and brightest, make them yours.
Yeah - I'm not an open borders person, but when it comes to STEM immigration, I'm extremely bullish.
Anyone remember the Cuban boat-lift that was Castro approved because dissidents, prisoners and institutionalized were specifically included among the refugees.
Why would Putin not avail himself of the same opportunity.
And if the good people of russia are stuck remaining in russia, maybe there they can do some good there, knowing that they cannot cut their losses and run.
This is an immoral argument.