The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
How Many Opinions Did Each Justice Write During OT 2021?
During the October 2021 Term, each Justices authored between five and eight majority opinions. The Chief assigned himself the most majority opinions (8) and Justice Kavanaugh had the fewest (5).
Justice Kavanaugh wrote the most concurring opinions with 8. Indeed, Kavanaugh beat Thomas and Alito, who each had 7. Five of the Kavanaugh concurrences were solo (Wooden, Ramirez, Shurtleff, Dobbs, and Biden v. Texas). The other three were joined by Barrett (Zubaydah), Gorsuch (Cummings), and Roberts (Bruen). We are well familiar by now with the Kavanaugh concurrence, which stakes out some middle ground to moderate a majority opinion.
Gorsuch wrote five concurrences. Unlike the Kavanaugh concurrences, many of the Gorsuch concurrences would push even further than did the majority. Some concurrences push the Court to the right (NFIB v. OSHA, Shurtleff, Egbert, West Virginia v. EPA). Other concurrences push the Court to the left (Wooden, Vaello Madero).
Justice Barrett wrote four concurrences. In Bruen, Barrett's solo concurrence asked whether the originalist point of inquiry should be 1791 or 1868. Her other three separate writings came in Viking River Cruise (joined by Kavanaugh and Chief in part), Wooden (joined by Thomas), and Tsarnaev (joined by Gorsuch). Unlike Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, the Barrett concurrences do not seek to move the Court to the right, left, or middle. They usually raise some questions to think about, like in Bruen, and last Term, in Fulton.
Now, let's turn to dissents. Justice Sotomayor wrote 13 (!) dissenting opinions. Her work load this term was prodigious.
Then we have Justice Thomas. He wrote 8 dissents. Several of those dissents were solo, and would have gone further than the majority, like in Whole Woman's Health. And those 8 dissents were on top of 7 majority opinions, and 7 concurrences. On the so-called Thomas Court, Thomas was frequently branching out on his own! He keeps busy. Justice Breyer, in his final term had 8 dissents, with only 1 concurrence. Justice Kagan had 7 dissents, with four concurrences. (To be fair, the Court's three progressives were each credited with authoring Dobbs.)
Justice Gorsuch also wrote 8 dissents. Three were solo YOLO dissents (Babcock, Kemp, and Shoop). The other 5 were lefty-dissents: Zubaydah (joined by Sotomayor), Patel (joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan), Denezpi (joined by Sotomayor and Kagan), George (joined by Breyer and Sotomayor), and Castro-Huerta (joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan).
Gorsuch does not fit on a normal ideological scale. For example, the Times plotted him somewhere near Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett, but he is not in the center. The same person would dismantle the administrative state but cede half of Oklahoma to Indian tribes. On some cases, he is hard left. On other cases, he is hard right. He is tough to characterize. But, with the law of averages, he falls in the middle.
Justice Kavanaugh wrote two dissents. The first dissent, Concepcion, was a 5-4 case. I think it is possible that Kavanaugh lost the majority opinion in Concepion after Gorsuch flipped, as Sotomayor had two assignments from January. Kavanaugh's second dissent was in Empire Health. The latter case is the sort of nerdy issue that D.C. Circuit judges seem to enjoy.
Justice Barrett wrote two dissents. The first Nance v. Ward, was joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. (I believe this was the only time that Thomas assigned Barrett a dissent this term.) The second was Biden v. Texas. Recall that Barrett agreed with the Chief on the merits, but found the Court lacked jurisdiction.
In total, Justice Sotomayor had the most opinions with 24. Justice Thomas trailed behind her with 22, and Justice Gorsuch had 20. The Justices with the fewest opinions were Barrett with 12, and Roberts with 11. Historically, the Chief Justice does not write separately often. And last year, in which Barrett had a partial term, she wrote only one concurrence (Fulton) and three dissents. After the Chief, Barrett seems less likely to write separately.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As you said, Barrett had a partial term. Considering that, 12 doesn't seem like a terribly small number. Next year, unless something unforeseen happens, we should get a better idea how busy she (and Jackson) are keeping themselves.
Oops, it was her first term that was quiet. So 12 really is pretty small.
I suspect that you had to adjust the scale to keep Sotomayor on the screen.
At a blog for disaffected, fringe-dwelling wingnuts, that seems right.
and the pests that parasitize them. don't leave yourself out.
The court heard all oral arguments in cases accepted for the term remotely via teleconference and provided live audio streams of the argument sessions. The court made the decision in accordance with public health guidance in response to COVID-19.
The court issued 67 opinions during its 2020-2021 term. Two cases were decided in one consolidated opinion. Ten cases were decided without argument. Click here for more information on the court's opinions.
The court agreed to hear 62 cases during its 2020-2021 term. Of those, 12 were originally scheduled for the 2019-2020 term but were delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic. Five cases were removed from the argument calendar.
https://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_cases,_October_term_2020-2021
The link shows Cases by Circuit too.
OOOPS!
Wrong term.
Here's the last term's info.
The court agreed to hear 68 cases during its 2021-2022 term.[7] Four cases were dismissed and one case was removed from the argument calendar.[8]
The court issued decisions in 66 cases during its 2021-2022 term. Three cases were decided without argument. Between 2007 and 2020, SCOTUS released opinions in 1,062 cases, averaging between 70 and 90 cases per year.
https://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_cases,_October_term_2021-2022
"The same person would dismantle the administrative state but cede half of Oklahoma to Indian tribes."
"Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law. Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word,", was how Gorsuch put it.
CONGRESS had ceded half of Oklahoma to Indian tribes. (Not so technically, Congress ceded the land to the tribes BEFORE Oklahoma became a state, it was never state land in the first place.) The Court merely said that if Congress wants to renege on the deal, they have to do their own dirty work, the Court won't do it for them.
Amen--I logged in to make same point, but you covered it more eloquently. Gorsuch seems lost on woke transgender-related cases which will likely haunt us, but seems quite judicially conservative on Indian affairs.
Um, I didn't think a senior justice ever "assigned" a dissent, as every justice is free to author a dissent when not in the majority. Just like a choosing to write a concurrence. If you mean a group of dissenters agreed to join with one justice's text, I suppose that could sometimes happen and be in deference to the senior justice's suggestion.
"We are well familiar by now with the Kavanaugh concurrence, which stakes out some middle ground to moderate a majority opinion."
Ironic for such a controversial nomination/confirmation.
Just curious, why only identify Trump nominees?
Surely the others were nominated by some president somewhere.
Wonder what the new Justice's first assignment will be? Any cases on the docket regarding women's rights?
How could four votes for cert ever be gathered for that sort of case?
Because the originalist interpretation is that women have no rights. History and tradition must govern here, and no using history newer than 150+ years ago.