The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
A Term Of DIGs And Almost-DIGs
This past term, the Court only issued 58 signed opinions. As low as that number is, it was made even lower by DIGs. The Supreme Court dismissed as improvidently granted two cases:
- United States v. Texas was DIG'd. Justice Sotomayor dissented from the DIG.
- Arizona v. San Francisco was DIG'd. Chief Justice Roberts wrote a concurrence to the DIG, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito.
In four other cases, dissenters would have DIG'd the petition:
- Hemphill v. New York: Justice Thomas would have DIG'd.
- Unicolors v. H&M Henens & Mauritz: Justice Thomas would have DIG'd.
- Kemp v. United States: Justice Gorsuch would have DIG'd.
- Shoop v. Twyford: Justice Gorsuch would have DIG'd the petition.
By contrast, during the OT 2020 Term, there was only one DIG, Henry Schein v. Archer. And Justice Alito would have DIG'd Minerva Surgical v. Hologic.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Oops! I did it again!
I played with your heart
Got lost in the game!"
-- Spears, J.
No witty neologisms proposed, such as "digcurrence"? Is there such a thing as a digsental, analogous to a dissental?
So, it's an acronym for some Latin phase meaning "Almost did our job"?
This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OYKd8SVrI