The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
How Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders Became a Separate Classification from "Asian Americans"
Native Hawaiians had found that being lumped in with Asian Americans hurt their chances of admission to West Coast colleges.
When the Office of Management and Budget first created in the 1970s the racial and ethnic classifications that are used across the government and became standard throughout American society, Native Hawaiians were included in the "Asian and Pacific Islanders" classification.
As sociologist Michael Omi explained 2001 article, this wound up not sitting well with Native Hawaiians:
Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii) initiated a discussion and subsequent lobbying effort to move Native Hawaiians out of the Asian/Pacific Islander category beginning in the early 1990s. Senator Akaka's office had been receiving phone calls from students and alumni of Kamehameha High School complaining of the difficulty of convincing mainland colleges and universities to consider Native Hawaiian admissions and scholarship decisions separately from those of Asian Americans.
Senator Akaka proceeded to do the logical thing, which is to propose that OMB "create a new indigenous category of 'Native American,' that would group Native Hawaiians together with American Indians and Alaskan Natives." OMB did not like this suggestion, "fearing that the move would open up the contentious and unresolved issue of Native Hawaiian sovereignty." And while Omi does not say so, I have read elsewhere that Native American groups also opposed such a change, not wanting Native Hawaiians to become eligible for various programs geared to American Indians.
OMB's Sally Katzen therefore proposed a compromise: "Why not put Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders together into a separate category? The proposal became official on October 30, 1997, when the Asian or Pacific Islander category was disaggregated into two categories.
And author's note: If you find this sort of thing interesting, why not preorder Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classifications in America? It's now available on Kindle for only $9.99.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If it is not available for $9.99, what is it available for? 🙂
" It's not available on Kindle "
If it is not available on Kindle, in what format is it available?
(Did you have Prof. Blackman submit this while you are vacationing?)
Somehow I'm not surprised that the fact that Hawaii is not in Asia wasn't considered.
Somehow I'm not surprised that the fact that Hawaii is not in Asia wasn't considered.
None of the U.S. is located in Asia, and yet a lot of people who live in and/or were born in the U.S. qualify as "Asian-American". Do you suppose that's because the label isn't based on the location in which one lives or was born?
"If you find this sort of thing interesting, why not preorder..."
If you find this sort of thing disgusting, why not vote against the people who promote this (racist) crap, i.e., Democrats?
Democrats have been peddling racism since antebellum slavery. They went to Jim Crow mandated segregation to affirmative action mandated integration, always sticking with tried and true racism. Democrats cannot comprehend life without racism.
European classism has the advantage that money redistribution is a plausible "cure", with the corresponding disadvantage that failure to cure it is more obvious. Democrat racism is not nearly as amenable to redistribution, leading to poor proxies like slavery reparations, but the advantage is that redistribution can never change skin color, so racism has no simple "cure" and will always be the Democrats' core platform.
I have been telling people for a long time that Greeks, Southern Italians, and possibly Spanish people should be classified as Middle Eastern/North African, although they too are considered White. Cmon, we haven’t enjoyed the benefits that the more Aryan Northern Europeans have, and these countries are still borderline developing nations populated by mostly Brown people. (As a Greek, I’ve also endured micro aggressions about where to find the best gyros, and baklava, not to mention the butt sex jokes).
Precisely, Nick.
If those people had a clue they would be hunting galaktoboureko instead.
Racial classification is racist.
Q.E.D.
The only way to cure racism is stop tracking race. Even calling criminals black or white is, literally, a black or white choice in a colored world, and would be better served by an actual color description.
As long as government mandates tracking and comparing and noticing race, society will remain racist.
Why stop there?
Remove religion, ethnicity, nationality. . . everything.
Then we wouldn't need borders either since we're all the same.
Hey - maybe you're on to something.
Dang, I just went all slippery slope.
I'd say that what you did was to go full-simpleton...but that ship sailed a looooong time ago.
I'd say you went more ad absurdum, apedad.
Took the logic being used here, noted it had no limiting factor, and ran.
Now they have to distinguish between recognizing race versus other demographics if they want to keep the argument. Pretty well done!
(Also note that Filipino Americans are classified as Asian Americans rather than Pacific Islanders, even though they all literally have ancestry from islands in the Pacific, and ethnograhically are closer to Austronesians than to East Asians.)
I assume that's the internal government classification as the Filipinos I know all choose the logical Pacific Islander, me I choose African American courtesy by way of Lucy.