The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Casino Mogul Steve Wynn and Lawyer Lisa Bloom Settle #TheyLied Libel Claim, Bloom Will Reportedly Retract
From Bloomberg Law (see also Casino.org (Devin O'Connor)):
Former Wynn Resorts Ltd. CEO Steve Wynn agreed to dismiss his lawsuit accusing attorney Lisa Bloom and her law firm of defaming him in a press release that said Wynn ordered female show performers to present themselves in a more sexually appealing way ….
"Per the terms of the settlement, Ms. Bloom will be issuing a public statement within 5 days of the dismissal of the action, which will acknowledge a retraction of the defamatory statement," Todd L. Bice of Pisanelli Bice PLLC, who represents Wynn, told Bloomberg Law on Friday. "The financial terms of the payment to Mr. Wynn are confidential."
For more on the underlying allegations, see the Ninth Circuit's decision last year Wynn v. Bloom, which allowed the libel lawsuit to go forward:
Defendants-Appellants Lisa Bloom and the Bloom Firm … appeal from the district court's denial of their [anti-SLAPP] Special Motion to Dismiss ….
Wynn has demonstrated a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Bloom Defendants acted with actual malice [i.e., knowledge or reckless disregard as to falsehood] in publishing the Press Release…. To constitute reckless disregard, the defendant must have published a false statement with a "high degree of awareness of [its] probable falsity," or "entertained serious doubts as to the truth of [the] publication.".
The Press Release suggests that Wynn instructed—personally or through a third party—female ShowStoppers performers "to strip down to bras and panties, put on heels, and apply extra makeup so as to be sexually appealing" to him and that Wynn directly or indirectly retaliated against Angelina Mullins when she refused to comply.
However, neither Mullins nor Samuel Cahn-Temes told Bloom Defendants that they heard Wynn give the instructions or had knowledge that the instructions came from Wynn. In fact, at her deposition, Mullins testified that although she assumed the instructions came from Wynn, she "made it clear" to Bloom Defendants that she had no personal knowledge that they did.
Furthermore, Mullins and Cahn-Temes gave Bloom Defendants reason to doubt that Wynn was responsible. Both Mullins's and Cahn-Temes's depositions highlighted the differences between New York Broadway and Los Angeles Commercial styles of performance and how performers' styles and professional experiences may have shaped their understandings of appropriate attire and behavior. While Mullins's style was New York Broadway, choreographer Marguerite Derricks's style was Los Angeles Commercial.
Mullins testified that she told the Bloom Firm, before the Press Release was issued, that other dancers that worked for Derricks in the past thought that it "seemed very normal … to be asked to wear what they were wearing for [Derricks] in this context" and that those performers' understanding of "what is acceptable for Broadway style show rehearsals and … go-go or burlesque dancing was sort of blurred." Cahn-Temes testified that he told Bloom Defendants that Mullins and Derricks had a "clash" of personalities and style—New York versus Los Angeles—and that Mullins was pushed to the back or removed from numbers, at least in part, due to that clash. {Jordan Oslin, a Bloom Firm attorney, testified that he recalled Cahn-Temes telling him about the clash between the New York Broadway and Los Angeles Commercial styles but asserted that Cahn-Temes made it clear to him that the retaliation was a result of Mullins's refusal to sexualize herself for Wynn. Cahn-Temes's testimony contradicts Oslin's.}
Bloom Defendants chose to publish the Press Release inculpating Wynn after learning that none of the witnesses could confirm that Wynn played any role in giving the instructions and without considering alternative explanations or investigating further. Under these circumstances, though the result may not be certain or perhaps even likely, a reasonable jury could find that Bloom Defendants acted with actual malice in publishing the Press Release….
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Zero tolerance for the vile feminist lawyer. She needs to lose her license.
All employment lawyers are engaging in fraud. For example, they must disclose the tax consequences of any settlement, after non-deductible expenses and lawyer fees. The plaintiff may have to borrow money to pay the tax on the settlement.
They must disclose the employability consequences of the litigation, meaning, they will never work again.
They make people unemployable, whether female, disabled, or a minority. The employer is far better off buying a more expensive robot. The unemployment rate in these otherwise desirable employees shot up after the employment lawyers got through with their frivolous litigation. Hire a diverse, hire a lawsuit.
Lisa is a rare pretty feminist. Her mother is Gloria Alred. Lisa represented Harvey Weinstein, one of the most obnoxious human being ever born, truly a pig of a man. So much for feminism, a fake ideology promoting the destruction of the American patriarchal family, its big government replacement, and lucrative lawyer rent seeking.
Well, nothing to read in this comment section.
They were dancers, not sex workers.
In Vegas, the difference is not that clear.
Real story - when my wife was just graduated from HS, she asked her mother, a choreographer of these sorts of performances, on getting a job dancing. Her mother obliged, and got her int see a producer she worked with. He liked her dancing, but then asked to see some T&A. Whoops. Not what she was looking for. Her mother had helped stage the whole thing for her benefit.
The two jobs where young women would use their looks there to attract and sleep with rich guys, esp those running the casinos, were dancers and show girls. Goal was inevitable to get pregnant and a nice payoff. Vegas was filled with their kids. The boys tended to be brought in the back door after HS, and put into positions in the casinos that quickly led to middle management in the casinos (legitimate kids got the top management jobs).
I’ve often wondered why members of morality-type groups don’t try to insuinuate themselves into porn and other more or less explicitly sexual entertainment, then use sexual harassment law to address the inevitable directions to do sexually oriented things.
Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination. Sexual discrimination is excused by proving that whatever is demanded is a bona fide occupational qualification.
I believe under the current state of American law you can not hire only young, slim, moderately endowed stewardesses for your airline, despite the likely preference of customers for them and the positive impact on fuel costs, but you can hire biologically female sluts for a porn shoot to satisfy the preference of your customers for them.
If she had put the libel in a pleading, no matter how malicious and no matter how despicable the defamation, she'd be in the clear. I've seen lawyers defame the hell out of somebody in a court pleading here in the NC banana republic, and nothing could be done about it.
One victim filed a lawsuit against a libelous lawyer using a pleading as a shield. His lawsuit was immediately dismissed on a 12b motion. The judge scolded the plaintiff, even. Of course, many of our judges are scoundrels.
If she had put the libel in a https://bit.ly/3IET8mH no matter how malicious and no matter how despicable the defamation, she'd be in the cleanice
Recently I learned the news that you need a service where you can make money. I can prove to you that it is possible with the help of this link https://lowdepositcasino.org/nz/3-dollar-deposit-casino/ I found on the Internet. Having used this source, I was able to earn more money that is available at home, and it helped me to live more freely and independently. I believe that you have the opportunity to live as well as I do.
Ge dig själv den spelupplevelse du förtjänar genom att besöka https://betinia.se/sv/ – det svenska casinot som kommer att ta dig med storm. Utforska en omfattande samling av spel som garanterat tilltalar alla spelare. Oavsett om du är en rouletteexpert eller en pokerfantast, kommer du att hitta allt du behöver här. Registrera dig nu och dra nytta av fantastiska bonusar som kommer att öka dina vinstmöjligheter. Missa inte chansen att ge dig själv den ultimata spelunderhållningen!
wow, so poor
Wow, well, casinos are generally a thing that is always connected with some processes outside the game, but also the processes within the game itself speak volumes. For example, this case, doesn't tell me anything at all, because for me, a casino is a kind of psychotherapist with whom I can relieve tension and talk, so I'll say this: those who don't know how to play or don't understand the essence of casinos at all should stay out of them.
Indeed, gambling clubs are by and large a thing that is constantly associated for certain cycles outside the game, yet additionally, the cycles inside the actual game say a lot. For instance, this case doesn't let me know anything by any stretch of the imagination, in light of the fact that for me, a gambling club is a sort of psychotherapist with whom I can ease strain and talk, so I'll say this: the people who don't have the foggiest idea how to play or don't comprehend the pith of gambling clubs at all ought to avoid them.