The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: April 3, 1962
4/3/1962: Engel v. Vitale argued.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There's no link to the case.
This is the famous case that ruled against school prayer authorized by the state.
These lawyers allow plagiarism of the catechism in their homicide statutes. They believe in mind reading, forecasting, and that standards of conduct should come from a fictitious character. This character is a thinly disguised avatar for Jesus. Then they have the nerve to say, a football team may not kneel for a minute before going into battle. Some nerve, these lawyers have.
What is maddening? Eugene is an expert on cases involving a tiny cross on a city flag. Yet, he remains oblivious to this glaring violation of the Establishment Clause. That is true of all other extremist, anti-religion lawyers as well.
This was a great decision.
Some say the principle has been taken too far, but imagine what this country would be like without Engel v. Vitale, especially in the "Bible Belt".
Schoolchildren would be taught dubious dogma as incontestable fact.
Agreed, we must remove competing dogmas in order to more efficiently brainwash our children with the one true dogma of pushing childhood gender transition and banishing the slur 'mother' in favor of 'birthing persons'.