The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
NYC Exempts Wealthy Athletes From Vaccine Mandates: "A small number of people have an outsized impact on our economy"
The government undermines its compelling interest to mandate vaccinations for everyone else.
Just in time for opening day of baseball, New York City has exempted athletes from its citywide vaccine mandate. Now Kyrie Irving and other unvax'd athletes can play in professional sports. Meanwhile, all other employees in the stadiums are subject to the requirement. The New York Post captured the scene with the headline, "Tale of Two Citis."
New York City Mayor Eric Adams was quite candid why he created an exemption for rich athletes, but not other people, including those with sincerely held religious beliefs:
"A small number of people have an outsized impact on our economy."
Yes, he said the quiet part out loud. From the earliest days, of the pandemic. COVID policy was always dictated first by the policy preferences of those in power, and second by #science. The Governor of Pennsylvania deemed the Peeps marshmallow factory to be an "Essential" business, but gun stores were not. Governor Cuomo allowed 7,000 fans to watch a Buffalo Bills game, even as people were barred from assembling for religious gatherings. And now, the Mayor created a Kyrie carveout to help wealthy athletes. Oh, and the Yankees, Mets. and Yankees have been lobbying the Mayor to change the policy.
But privately, efforts were already underway by the owners and executives of some of the wealthiest and most influential sports franchises in the country to persuade Mr. Adams to change his mind.
The Yankees president, Randy Levine, personally reached out to the mayor's team and encouraged officials to consider that baseball is played outdoors where Covid transmission rates are lower than indoors.
Steven A. Cohen, the hedge fund manager and Mets owner who last year gave $1.5 million to a super PAC supporting Mr. Adams's mayoral campaign, has been paying $10,000 a month to a lobbying firm, Moonshot Strategies, to push state officials and City Hall on several issues, including Covid protocols.
Both baseball teams are believed to have players who remain unvaccinated, with opening day now two weeks away.
Corey Johnson, the former speaker of the City Council who now runs his own lobbying firm, is receiving $18,000 a month from the Nets's holding company, and lobbying records suggest that he recently contacted the mayor, his chief counsel and his chief of staff.
Yet, more than 1,500 city employees were fired for not being vaccinated. They probably were not able to afford such an expensive lobby effort. Rent seeking is tough.
In light of Fulton, these exemptions for athletes undermine the state's compelling interest to mandate vaccines. But don't worry. The mayor checked with his lawyers:
Dr. Jay Varma, an epidemiologist and health adviser to Mr. de Blasio, wrote on Twitter on Wednesday evening that vaccines work "unless you're rich and powerful, in which case lobbying works."
Dr. Varma called the new policy the "Kyrie Carve Out" and said he was concerned that the legal standing of the city's vaccine mandates could now be challenged in court as "arbitrary and capricious."
Mr. Adams rebutted that criticism on Thursday: "I would not be standing here today if I did not speak to the attorneys, and they said that this passes legal muster."
Sooner or later, a case will come to the courts that is not on an emergency basis. For example, an employee who lost his pension due to the termination will sue for damages. And in light of Fulton, and the Kyrie Carveout, the employees should prevail.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
While I think it's time to loosen restrictions, the playing field needs to be level. I had some hopes for Adams during the campaign, but so far he is singularly unimpressive.
I'm afraid I agree ... meet the new mayor, same as the old mayor.
The legal system totally failed the American people in the case of the politically motivated Democrat lockdown. It was to defeat Trump, a shoo-in at the election. It unnecessarily killed a million Americans, and millions of poor people around the world by starvation, a rough way to go. This lawyer holocaust is exceeded any other, including the 60 million babies they have killed. Judges did nothing about it.
"Democrat lockdown. It was to defeat Trump, a shoo-in at the election."
It was interesting how they got the rest of the world to go along with it.
Mental defectives like David of course fall for such moronic conspiracy theories but others will have to ask themeselves what their excuse is...
With record busting cases and deaths from variants, no lockdown. Covid has disappeared from the media. If you want to end lockdowns, do not bother going to court. Elect Biden.
Hey, Queenie, what is your race classification? I want to include it in the letter of recommendation to help you get the job you richly deserve.
Again, this is the kind of moron that supports Trump's wacky theories. He's clearly mentally ill, what's other people's excuse?
I was just quoting the daily Covid dashboard, Queenie.
Can you tell me your gender identification? I want to include it in my letter in support of your getting the better job you richly deserve. You are Chairman of the Department material, in my book.
You're a mental defective David, the kind of person drawn to Trump conspiracy theories. Covid has not 'disappeared from the media.' Trump himself said the deck was stacked against him. Etc. You're an idiot in the original sense of the word.
I mean, it has certainly receded. But Behar apparently hasn't noticed that this "As soon as Biden is elected, Covid will stop being a story" turned out to be complete MAGA insanity; in fact, it continued to be a big story for another year. It has receded now because it is less of a threat, primarily because vaccines. (And we have other treatments, too. Real ones, not horse dewormer.)
And of course major international wars tend to push other stories to the background, also.
What’s sad is that everyone did a good job in 2020 but Biden won and then Republicans started listening to their worst demons again and rejecting vaccines and public health mitigation measures…so Republican populations have significantly higher Covid death rate post vaccine availability. And that is with well to do older educated Republicans getting vaccinated…so the low information Trump voters were hardest hit as usual by Republican policies.
Really? You thought terrible law-blogging wasn't enough, so now you're going to tell us your views about today's cover story of the New York Post? What's next, videos of Tucker Carlson?
Natural born assignment editor.
You are always free not to tune in. Or ignore his posts in favor of others.
I know it is hard for you Europeans to grasp, but we believe in the marketplace of ideas here.
"we believe in the marketplace of ideas here"
I used to think that you are right ... and, perhaps, it is still true on this blog. But the last couple years of nation-wide censorship has made pretty clear that only some ideas can be sold in our marketplace.
There's virtually no actual 'censorship.' Their being social repercussions to what one says is not something knew or more widespread, it's just that it effects those that used to be insulated via privilege from it more now.
Threatening to cancel section 230, opening up internet giants to lawsuits that will strip hundreds of billions from their stock value, unless they censor harrassment, "and oh, look! Our political opponents are tweeting harassment, censor them, right before an election!"
This is the most grotesque violation of the First Amendment this side of bamboo under the fingernails.
You are quite mistaken ... many respectable scientists I know have been censored on Twitter and LinkedIn, some for merely referring to peer-reviewed literature, with the wink and nudge of the federal government.
This is censorship, even if the executive branch tries to launder it through private companies.
" Will no one rid me of this troublesome Priest? " - Henry II
Wouldn't part of that marketplace be to offer criticisms (competing products)?
"you're going to tell us your views about today's cover story of the New York Post"
He's not doing that, he is using the cover as a graphic illustration of the issue. Un-vaxed peons, FIRED. Un-vaxed rich dudes, special favors.
" Un-vaxed peons, FIRED. Un-vaxed rich dudes, special favors."
Move along. There's nothing to see there.
How did you ever make space for Carlson with Trump filling so much of that void?
Adams is the gift that keeps on giving. This guy really ran under false pretenses and all these slips reveal it more and more.
The simple truth is the left bends the knee to the wealthy as much if not more than the right.
Is Adams 'the left?'
Yes. Just because there were Dems further to the left in the primary does not mean he is not.
Please id what conservative positions he has?
Left is more than 'not conservative' Bob.
He ran as the center candidate in the primary. If you want 'left' that's Wiley or Garcia, for sure.
"He ran as the center candidate in the primary."
Which primary?
The left's primary.
That's a mighty protean definition you got there!
"center candidate"
Gotta have a right to have a "center"
Just reveling in your reductionism.
And in your ignorance of NY politics.
Marty. Is the NY Post headline false?
Let's see!
1. The NBA, a sports league with predominantly black players, has over a 95% vaccination rate.
2. However, there is one notable exception- Kyrie Irving. All season, he has been unable to play - either completely (team), or home games (due to the NY requirements).
3. Now, we have baseball ... MLB ... coming back. Baseball, of course, has a very low percentage of black players. It does, however, still maintain a large conservative fanbase, and has (in addition to the hispanic pipeline) a strong southern/rural/conservative pipeline of players. For this reason, there are a fair number of anti-vax players in MLB (as of the last report I could find, there were at least seven teams that were under 85% vaccinated).
4. So, we have NY relaxing its mandate because of BASEBALL. Again, BASEBALL.
5. JB, known for trying to make fetch ... sorry, Blue June and other "not things" happen, of course refers to this as the KYRIE CARVEOUT. Because he understands that the way to get his readers all riled up isn't to talk about the proud white people who are just tossin' the ball, not getting vaccinated ... NOPE. JB has to name it after some entitled black guy making, I am sure, more money than he "deserves" while poor white people have to suffer under the boot of woeness, or something.
It's sad, and predictable. Nice combo!
have you watched a MLB game? (no insult, most people don't anymore)
there's a shitload of Black Players, they just tend to come from Central/South Amurica, where Black Peoples still play baseball. (None from Haiti, strange, they make baseballs there, would think someone would think to learn to throw and hit them)
2021 World Champ Atlanta Braves (Suck it Robert Man-Friend!!!!!) starting line up was "Majority Minority" and just added an AA closer from the the Dodgers.
Race cards melt if not constantly put in use I guess.
Don't interrupt his rant about racism with facts like the actual number of BIPOCs in MLB. Or with details like "baseball is outdoors, and there is not fresh air outdoors than in an indoor stadium". He has a hate-on to keep turgid.
Your projection of racism onto every issue says a lot more about you than it does about Prof Blackman. Note that the "Kyrie Carve Out" was coined by (and is explicitly attributed in the article to "Dr. Jay Varma, an epidemiologist and health adviser to Mr. de Blasio".
Plus it's right before the playoffs start. Seems Adams wants Kyrie in the game.
Everything and everyone is racist all the time. They’re everywhere. They’re in your fucking closet. That’s gotta be what this is.
Or maybe instead it’s the coincidence of the timing of governments deciding that it’s no longer a pandemic and a new NYC mayor lining up with the start of baseball season. When basketball season started NYC was quivering in its boots over omicron.
But no, it’s gotta be racist. The new black mayor of New York is a virulent racist white supremacist fascist nazi. For sure.
There’s bias happening her but the actual unfair treatment went right over your head because you’re down there in the political mud.
Loki,
The sad thing is that Kyrie was screwing his fellow black superstars Durant and Harden by not playing. Now Harden has left the team considerably lowering this teammates chances of a serious playoff payout.
This actually has nothing to do with the racial demographics of basketball and baseball. If there is any racial angle it is the new NY mayor catering to his asshole brother.
I used to be dismissive of this line of argumentation, but seeing Stephen Smith for some reason publicly defend Aaron Rodgers while just trashing Kyrie caused me to rethink that.
They are all being stupid, but idk.
I guess racism is as good of a reason as any why NY shouldn't elect a black mayor.
Who knew Black mayors were so racist? Let's not make that mistake again.
Of course it is possible that Eric Adams, although certainly race conscious may not see everything through a race paradigm, even when there are racial implications.
Maybe he just thought it was better for the city to make an exception, and would have done the same for Kyrie Irving all along. In fact maybe he's just a Nets fan and he wants to make sure Irving and the Nets are best positioned for the playoffs.
But I really hope you aren't suggesting that a black man like Eric Adams has his hands tied by whatever the former white mayor did, and can't make up his own mind, are you?
I'm curious about the legal distinction allowing players, coaches, and bat/ball boys an exemption but not janitors, vendors, and ticket takers in the same venue. It makes as little medical sense as requiring masked servers for unmasked diners.
Equal under the law?
The mayor should have cited that venerable legal principle: the Golden Rule. He who has the gold, makes the rules.
The Golden Rule precisely means that he does not have to cite it.
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
and no, (Pre-emptive Strike) "Reverend" Kirkland, I'm not saying NBA Players are "Animals" other than in the sense we're all Homo (no Homo) Sapiens.
and speaking of Hypocrisy, does President Alzheimers go anyway without burning Hydrocarbons/, 747, don't think his Armored Limousine is running on electrons, heck, even his cane is giving off exhaust fumes... could have done this whole European junket on Zoom.
It's funny that the guy criticizing Biden's mental faculties seems incapable of writing a few sentences with correct spelling, punctuation, formatting, and such.
Einstein did the same thing, Amalthea (nice name, rhymes with Urea, Diarrhea, gotta be some more good ones)
NYC lawyers** always think that their regulations/laws "passes legal muster" ... until they don't (see also NYSRPA vs Bruen). NY is still fighting the stun gun ban lmao, even though every other jurisdiction has lost (https://reason.com/volokh/2022/03/15/r-i-stun-gun-ban-struck-down/).
My response is: Glad NYC signed themselves up to be a test case. I am not particularly persuaded that Jacobson v. Massachusetts is bad law, states may have such police power for vaccine mandates, but nothing will undermine this more than evidence that the rules are enforced unequally.
** Also NJ and Commiefornia
I think anyone wanting to eliminate the mandates should try a different tack. I think they should instead sue to eliminate the exemptions. Make it so NY has to defend the exemptions and show how crazy the rules are. Suing NY to enforce the rules equally would force NY to scrap the rules entirely.
Is "Citis" a typo or a pun that I'm not getting?
I believe that is a reference to Citibank.
Citi Field is the name of the Mets stadium.
Named after the bank. But yes, it is a reference to that.
The Mets play at Citi Field.
you mean "Lose" .
I remember the jingle the Mets used back in the day:
Meet the Mets
Greet the Mets
Step right up and beat the Mets.
Chipper Jones loved beating the Mets so bad after years of them chanting "Lar-rry, Lar-rry" he named his son "Shea"
Isn’t this always how Democrat utopias end up?
Power, privilege and wealth for the elites and mass murder, misery, and starvation for everyone else?
According to perennial data, the states with the most murder, misery, and starvation (and lowest education rates, highest unemployment rates, lowest income rates, highest rates in participation in religion, etc), are all your standard-issue Republican states.
"starvation"
No one in the US is starving.
"misery... highest rates in participation in religion"
A bigoted comment. You know that Pelosi and Biden say they are quite religious.
According to perennial data, - something you made up on the spot.
the states with the most murder, misery, and starvation Republicans can't do anything about Democrat cities. That's all the local issues.
(and lowest education rates, highest unemployment rates,
You're complaining about states that ensure you can make a living on one income? As opposed to Democrat states with a high cost of living that force both parents to work?
lowest income rates,
High cost of living is a drawback, not a feature.
highest rates in participation in religion, etc), are all your standard-issue Republican states.
And high rates of marriage, low out of wedlock births, low divorce rate, etc. All good things.
So yes, the Republican system is superior to the Democrat system.
How goes the murder rate in LA and drug use in San Fransicko?
Now do urban centers
Washington, DC has the highest crime rates in the US, and you think it is Republican?
Is Deep-blue Maryland one of the standard-issue Republican states?
How about Purple Nevada?
You are delusional.
Not to mention the absurdity of using absolute income as a measure without considering cost of living. Do you seriously think that making $50K in NYC (187% of US average) is better than making $45K in Topeka (80% of US average)?
And all along the way slippery slope arguments are ridiculed
Covid-19 Vaccines Were Deadly in Rare Cases. Governments Are Now Weighing Compensation.
U.S., U.K. plan to review suspected cases of serious vaccine side effects for potential payouts, while Norway has already awarded damages
Whoops, sorry we killed you, here's some money.
ML,
"Whoops, sorry we killed you, here's some money."
What a shithead statement!
Have you ever read the black box warnings on the prescription meds you take?
Or are you a follower of the Church of Ignorance-is-Bliss?
What a shithead statement!
Permit me to introduce you to M.L.
It’s actually a big step up from not caring at all about people hurt by the vaccines. And from trying to hide the risks.
Too bad they decided to pretend Covid was very dangerous to everyone instead of only to specific identifiable groups.
Those who support unlimited political lobbying and unlimited money to politicians' campaigns can't really complain about things like this. This is the system you have created.
AWD,
Come on. That system started many decades before Citizens United.
Very true. That's why I didn't mention Citizens United.
You have it backwards. The reason people go into government is to get in the way, to get paid to get back out of the way.
This isn't a sad, unintended side effect of the wielding of power. It is government operating as designed, going back to the first people swinging, ehhh, clubs are getting tired. What else we got?
Going back to people swinging the jawbone of an ass, wandering down to a dirt crossroad and demanding the farmers trading there pay their fair share.
That may or may not be true. But why shouldn't we want to make the system better? More responsive to the needs of more than just the uber wealthy?
The politicians arent corrupt, you stupid people have too much freedom!
Is that intended as a reply to my statement? It was hardly worth unmuting you.
You want to control the citizens because the politicians are so easily influenced.
Duh
All governments "control the citizens" to some extent, of course. Absolutist arguments like yours are moronic and nonsensical. Duh indeed. You get to go back to being a gray box.
The fact that the government and every major corporation spent so many months gaslighting everyone into thinking if they didn't get a vaccine with limited efficacy they were a horrible person who wanted to kill grandma and handicap people is going to need to be dealt with soon.
I agree with the view that this stinks.
Just another politician being an unscrupulous whore.
"Just another politician being an unscrupulous whore."
Amen!
"Suppose you were an unscrupulous whore, and suppose you were a mayor of a major city; but I repeat myself."
I'm joining this crowd.
Sigh. My issue with this piece is that ... well, it just doesn't make any sense.
Obligatory, the carve out here is idiotic and should not be done. Eric Adams ought to face scrutiny for this decision. I agree, lift it for everyone or don't lift it.
But legally speaking, why does it sink the law? Again I'm not saying I agree with this law. I dont, I just don't understand the legal argument.
See, you simultaneously believe that a failure to include reasonable exceptions sinks a law. Ok fine. But you also believe that including exceptions also sinks a law! And this might make sense where certain exceptions are illegal, say race, and certain are required, say religion via RFRA, but for athletes? That's not a category thats relevant. Under this reasoning no law can stand.
Even under Fulton, I just don't see how this exception is comparable to religious organizations. Furthermore, granted I moved out of the NY-NJ region but ... do churches require vaccines? Mine doesn't.
And wouldn't the solution be, in any case, to sever the athlete carve out? Granted I do think this way of solving these sorts of issues is stupid but thats how it's usually done.
It sinks the law for people claiming religious exemptions. Exceptions like this make the law neither neutral nor generally applicable. So Smith doesn’t apply, and it has to make exceptions for religious objectors too.
My view of the Smith exception is “weak Alito.” The existence an exception does not automatically invalidate the rule. It merely moves the standard back to pre-Smith strict scrutiny. Some exceptions can be justified by compelling interest.
But this exception fails pre-Smith strict scrutiny. And by a lot. If NYC is willing to make exceptions like this, it ought to be fairly straightforward for a plaintiff to argue that NYC isn’t really serious defeat about its vaccination mandate and doesn’t actually consider its interests really compelling.
If NYC can make an exception for people who make big contributions to its economic welfare, it can jolly well make exceptions for people who make big contributions to its spiritual welfare too.
There may well be an Equal Protection and other constitutional arguments, not just Religion Clause ones. Saying that rich people don’t have to follow laws the little people have to follow just because they’re rich (what else does making a big economic contributikn to the economy mean?) seems very close to conferring a title of nobility.
Since vaccinated individuals can still get Covid and infect others, and since hospitals aren’t completely full, that leads to the question of how is it any of the government’s business whether a person is vaccinated?
" sincerely held religious beliefs "
"Sincerely held" is nothing more than lack-of-virtue signaling for right-wingers, who neither know nor care whether most of these claims for special privilege for superstition are sincere -- and avidly ignore the point that many of them are not sincere.
Carry on, clingers -- so far as your stale, ugly thinking can carry anyone in modern, reasoning, reality-based America.
I knew you'd weigh in with your normal insulting comments- without even noting that it's obvious from the mayor's statement that covid restrictions have always been about control and obedience and never about health and safety.
Triple vaccinated white house press secretary Jennifer Rene Psaki has the dreaded covid for the second time- having obviously "followed the science". And- credits the vaccine for saving her life or keeping her from having serious complications!
Meanwhile poor ignorant unvaccinated me with multiple close exposures as defined by the CDC still tests negative for covid antibodies when donating blood (well, platelets now), and gets tested weekly to see if I've got it. One of my 10 vaccinated coworkers got it recently. From another vaccinated person- his wife. But even though every vaccinated person can get it- as proven- they're not tested weekly because- they're vaccinated! Yep, follow the science!
Just a few weeks back Psychology Today published this new exciting finding that high levels of Vitamin D are protective against serious covid- something many of have known since the beginning of the covidiocy. Now it's finally breaking out into the mainstream media. So, maybe it's a Vitamin D blood level of 60 ng/ml protecting me. Maybe it's something else. Taking D supplements isn't the only thing I'm doing. Masking and social distancing are two of the things I'm not doing.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-fallible-mind/202202/striking-link-between-vitamin-d-levels-and-omicron
If you're really following the science, at this point you have to realize the vaccine is at best, simply useless. At worst, incredibly harmful in the long term.
"If you're really following the science, at this point you have to realize the vaccine is at best, simply useless. At worst, incredibly harmful in the long term."
The level of your disaffectedness is stunning.
I know that when I want to understand the operation of an infectious disease, I ask a psychologist.
No. Literally nobody knew that since the beginning of the pandemic. To know something does not involve asserting it. It involves having seen and evaluated evidence that proves it.
Blackman: Stenographer from the NY Post to the VC audience.
Oy.
"Steven A. Cohen ... has been paying $10,000 a month to a lobbying firm, Moonshot Strategies, to push state officials and City Hall on several issues, including Covid protocols."
I probably would have used In Like Flynn Solutions myself. Or maybe the Git-R-Done Group.
of course, the unwashed masses are kept as far as possible from the millionaire athletes in most sports that have or produce millionaire athletes. In hockey, they have those plastic shields around the edge of the rink, and in the baseball stadiums they have fences around the outfield. In football (American) it's theoretically possible to have an interaction with a player as part of a touchdown celebration where the athlete jumps into the stands, but in football (everywhere else) players celebrate scoring by running to the middle of the field. In basketball, you do sometimes wee players going into the stands. Boxers typically have their own entrance to the arena, and don't come down the stairs from the nosebleed seats like they did in olden tymes.
Of all the legitimate criticisms to make to reinforce the point of how dumb and corrupt Adams' new policy is, you pick comparing indoor where nobody will wear masks or get tested or be distanced to an outdoor, masked, socially distanced event where you need a negative covid test to get in. And picking a deliberately obtuse member of the category of "food" (of poor nutritional value though they may be) to pretend like there's no difference between food production and gun stores (which I too opposed closing, but not on such disingenuous grounds).This is why nobody takes right wings hacks like you seriously. You try to parlay legitimate criticisms into an excuse to criticize any covid policy beyond 'pretend it doesn't exist'. It's the classic game of 'Well they say this or that is science, it's not, therefore we should disregard all science and everything experts say and instead follow whatever Tucker and Hannity say.'
And then you want to further pretend that once established, if a policy enacted in an emergency ends after the most serious stage of the emergency ends, that means they were wrong to ever have implemented it. Come on dude, you're a law professor, you know damn well if a student made as many non-sequiturs as this post, a good grade wouldn't be forthcoming, unless perhaps it was a righteous right wing political cause.
You start out with a legitimate point, and torture it into an exercise in intellectual dishonesty.
2nd sentence should read 'And being deliberately obtuse in picking'.
Site really needs an edit button. Put a 5 minute timer on it if you don't want it abused.
Typo, Josh: