The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: February 28, 1966
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The beginning of the lawyer campaign to protect their client, the criminal. Protect, privilege, empower. Crime rates exploded. Lawyer employment improved. The 15 million common law crimes and the 100 million internet crimes are 100% the fault of the rent seeling lawyer profession.
It got a little scared of the wrath of the public. It adopted mandatory sentencing guidelines. These immediately dropped all crime 40%. That surged lawyer unemployment. So Ivy indoctrinated Scalia led the charge against mandatory sentencing guidelines. Lawyer employment grew again, at the cost of thousands of lives, millions of batteries, $trillion in losses. Even the criminals are suffering with record busting 100000 overdose deaths from Chinese fentanyl.
"Crime rates exploded."
I don't think we can say 'exploded' since it seems there was a rising trend in crime.
Certainly NOT due to lawyers.
https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
Any other factor you can name as a cause of crime is caused by the rent seeking lawyer. This profession is 10 times more toxic and damaging than organized.
Most criminal defense attorneys would like to change “You have the right to remain silent” to “Don’t say a f**king word!!”
STFU, for short.
It is amazing to me, having worked for a DA (albeit long ago), how often suspects, even after being given a Miranda, still shoot themselves in the foot. It is helpful if a big production is made of it -- lights, camera, they get to be a star.
Most people want to explain themselves.
Many think they are much smarter than they are — if that weren't the case, they likely wouldn't be in custody in the first place! — and think they can talk their way out of trouble. (They often correctly think that not talking will make people suspicious.)
I read once that many years later Ernesto Miranda got into some unrelated legal trouble and was headed to trial. People realized that he was that Miranda and some interesting voir dire followed. I don't recall how things turned out.