The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Settlement in Firing of Professor for Tweets (for $70K + Attorney Fees)
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reports:
Today, Lora Burnett, a former Collin College history professor fired for tweets critical of the college administration and of former Vice President Mike Pence, accepted the college's offer to pay $70,000 and attorneys' fees, bringing her First Amendment lawsuit to an end.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education represented Burnett. Although the college has not admitted liability, it has effectively chosen to concede the lawsuit by offering judgment in favor of Burnett….
During the vice presidential debate in October 2020, Burnett tweeted: "The moderator needs to talk over Mike Pence until he shuts his little demon mouth up." The tweet was picked up by conservative media outlets and outraged Texas State Rep. Jeff Leach, who texted Collin College President Neil Matkin to ask if Burnett was "paid with taxpayer dollars." Matkin responded that he would "deal with it."
Burnett landed on Matkin's radar again in January 2021 with a tweet countering his assessment that the pandemic was "blown utterly out of proportion." Burnett shared a link to an obituary of a former Collin professor, tweeting "Another @collincollege professor has died of COVID." The college responded by issuing Burnett a formal warning.
During this time, FIRE wrote repeated letters to the college president, advising him of Burnett's rights and reminding him of the college's constitutional obligations. Public institutions are bound by the First Amendment; as such, it is unconstitutional to terminate a faculty member based on comments about matters of public concern.
In February, Leach prematurely tweeted that Burnett had been fired, which he characterized as a "BIG WIN." Nine days later, the college followed through. In response, FIRE and Burnett filed a First Amendment lawsuit….
Burnett is the third faculty member disciplined by Collin College in 2021 for exercising their First Amendment rights.
On Jan. 28, professors Audra Heaslip and Suzanne Jones — who represent two-thirds of the leadership of a local chapter of the Texas Faculty Association, a non-bargaining union — were informed that their contracts would not be renewed, due to objections from senior administrators. The college cited the professors' criticism of the college's decision to reopen amidst the pandemic, references to the college's name on the TFA's website, and Jones' signature on a public letter urging the removal of Confederate statues.
Jones has filed a lawsuit against Collin College that is currently pending….
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The right result for an un-sympathetic candidate, since IIRC she had written approving about a teenage girl getting expelled from school for saying something Ms. Burnett didn't like.
But still the right result.
Not much more than nuisance value.
I wish all politicians would shut their little demon mouths up.
" it has effectively chosen to concede the lawsuit by offering judgment in favor of Burnett… "
Did a lawyer write this? Settling for what appears to be less than defense cost is "conceding?"
FIRE is a self-promoting, partisan, downscale joke.
They opposed right-wing censorship by an institution in the Texas community college system, you ingrate.
I suppose that won't affect your talking point that FIRE and this blog ignore right-wing censorship in superstition-ridden, conservative clinger, downscale, Handmaid's Tale-emulating, meanie-head institutions.
I suppose if Arthur were a real-life instead of a movie lawyer, he could have done a better job.
Thank goodness she was just tweeting vile partisan garbage in a position of authority in a publicly-funded institution rather than praying, and thus was able to get relief!
Cancel Culture is out of control.
This isn't much money and the fees can't have been very large at this point in the case. (That's often the best time to make an offer of judgment, since the fees, if the case went to trial, would probably dwarf the client's recovery.) I'd like to know whether the plaintiff has a new job and just wants to get on with her life and why the college listened to its lawyers, which is all too rare.
I assume she has a new job, since generally (well, at least, often) a settlement includes a return to the job, back pay, certain job protection guarantees that will apply in the future, etc..
Seems like this plaintiff mostly wanted the symbolic win...an acknowledgement that what the college did to her was wrong, and she definitely got it. We're arguing about the amount of her recovery, which is fine (this is a legal blog). But she did win here, and the school did lose. And I suspect that that's really what this woman wanted to prove.
I'd say this is the way to bet, but I'd like to know, not just make good guesses.
" I assume she has a new job, since generally (well, at least, often) a settlement includes a return to the job, back pay, certain job protection guarantees that will apply in the future, etc.. Seems like this plaintiff mostly wanted the symbolic win...an acknowledgement that what the college did to her was wrong, and she definitely got it. "
You seem comprehensively unfamiliar with Rule 68. Your assumptions and assertions seem pointless.
(It has been 30 years since I used Rule 68, but I still can recognize that these comments are silly.)
I hope Professor Shapiro takes the time to read this particular blog, in light of his unfortunate tweet on Wednesday, January 26th.