The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Federal Court on Military Religious Exemptions from COVID Vaccination
Justice Steven Merryday (M.D. Fla.) denies certain related claims today (Navy Seal 1 v. Biden), but deferred judgment on these ones:
Whether characterized as a facial challenge or as a class of precisely similar as-applied challenges, requiring only a single judicial determination, the plaintiffs' contention is — based on current data — quite plausible that each branch's procedure for requesting a religious exemption is a ruse that will result inevitably in the undifferentiated (and therefore unlawful under RFRA) denial of each service member's request. Particularly, the data produced by the defendants show that more than 16,643 requests for a religious exemption pend. The military has granted no exemptions but has denied hundreds.
This disparity, although susceptible to a benign explanation is, as well, susceptible to an explanation actionable and remediable under RFRA. The importance of a person's right to religious liberty, protected in the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution and the explicit implementing commands of RFRA, commends deferring the resolution of the service members' motion for preliminary injunction pending the accumulation and reporting of additional data and the resumption — with the benefit of more complete and telling data — of the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction.
Counsel for the defendants acknowledged at the hearing that each service branch retains a centralized and readily accessible record of the status of each exemption request in each branch of the military. The defendants must file every FOURTEEN DAYS, beginning on January 7, 2022, a notice providing SEPARATELY FOR EACH BRANCH OF THE ARMED FORCES:
(1) the aggregate number of religious-exemption requests from COVID-19 vaccination, the aggregate number of initial denials, the number of those denials in which the chaplain determined that the asserted belief is sincere, the aggregate number of appeals pending, the aggregate number of denials for which the time to appeal has expired without appeal, the number of appeals denied, the number of successful appeals (that is, the number of appeals that resolve or remand for resolution the application for an exemption), and the total number of religious exemptions finally granted and finally denied;
(2) the number of medical-exemption requests from COVID-19 vaccination and the number of medical exemptions granted and denied;
(3) the number of other exemptions from COVID-19 vaccination granted for any other reason; and
(4) the number of courts-martial and the number of separation proceedings pending or concluded against a service member whose request for a religious exemption was denied after appeal.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So basically because the Executive Order makes an allowance for a "religious exemption" you can't do anything about it, even though you can't GET a "religious Exemption".
No. The process for getting or denying exemptions is ongoing and one may have a cause after ones particular exemption is denied, but not at this stage.
Senior military officers have stated that religious exemptions will NOT be granted.
And those can be litigated, but this suit is not about post-denial appeals.
No they can't. You don't understand military law. The only way was to do what they did here, and it failed.
No officer who wants to continue his/her career is approving an exemption. Far safer to just deny them all.
Exactly.
The military is about the one place where a vaccination mandate makes sense. You need fit, healthy people at all times - same way there is no 'religious or medical exemption' to be fat or lazy.
If you really and truly cannot take the vaccine, then you should be allowed to depart the military without penalty, but that's about it.
The "one place" ?!
Not hospitals? Hospices? Retirement housing?
Other jobs, you can take time off if you get sick - and damn well should for those jobs, for diseases other than COVID, too!
In the military, you aren't off. Even when on 'vacation' you are subject to recall at any moment.
Also, hospices? What exactly are you afraid of happening there?
That certainly sounds reasonable and defensible
Soldiers get to take time off for sickness as well. Having been one myself, I can easily attest to this. Also, having "sick time" as a benefit and feeling your employment is safe if you use that time are two different things. The mass deaths at meat-packing companies are one example, but in the US, it's customary to go to work sick regardless. Many hourly employees don't get paid sick leave, either.
At hospices it's customary not to kill the patients faster by bringing in communicable, deadly diseases. Just because they're already dying doesn't mean they want their last 5 months of life shortened and made more painful.
Sure, soldiers can take sick leave - when the military doesn't need them for something else. Many a sick soldier has been forced to go on patrol, or into combat, or just into fitness runs.
And again, seriously, hospices? On the scale of importance, hospices should rate so far down the list that rational people don't pay much attention to those million people.
Ironically, their general health and fitness level is why they're not at material risk of harm from the boo-flu in the first place. The miltary's overall CFR is about three hundredths of a percent, or somewhere between one and two orders of magnitude less than the civilian population.
Sigh. Once again we have people acting as if being sick is okay as long as one doesn't die. But military readiness depends on members of the armed forces being healthy, not merely alive.
Did you follow the link? Of 252,658 Military Cases of COVID cumulatively recorded 248,295 are fully recovered. COVID is a non-factor in military readiness.
After they recovered, sure. But DMN is talking about the effects of having a bunch of currently sick soldiers, or soldiers who would soon get sick after deploying. That would absolutely effect readiness.
Great. Where's your evidence that the rate of debilitating illness in the military population as compared to the civilian population is grossly disproportionate to that of death?
You don't think Covid has been debilitating in the civilian population?
Read again, more slowly.
You're going to have to rephrase, because it's pretty unclear what you want to compare, much less why.
Comparative ratios. Really cool concept. Check it out.
Why would anyone trust their numbers if they did hand them out? Afterall, they covered up, didn't record, or generally downplayed many reactions to the the anthrax vaccine that was forced on all of us.
If you cannot breath easily out of a gas mask you won't be able to breath in one at all.
Yeah, but it should be becoming apparent that getting vaccinated is not the way to assure a fit healthy military.
The number of countries with very high vaccination rates is showing that the vaccine provides minimal protection, and the number of young males in the military that are more susceptible to vaccine induced myocardial inflammation should give pause too.
I'd say the best way to protect the military, a young fit population that is already at little danger from covid, is to build natural herd immunity, and have a sufficient supply of effective anti-covid drugs available to keep the effects manageable.
And if it's hard to keep older, more vulnerable, higher ranking officers from being exposed to infection from the troops, from what I've seen, a culling is overdue.
Vaccines provide little protection?! No, that's not at all true. Countries are not individuals.
And your info about natural immunity seems a few months old - it is no longer at all clear that functions at the same level as vaccine immunity.
S-0,
I follow the medical literature related to COVID-19 daily. If anything, you are out of date. Vaccine immunity seems to have a very short (4 to 6 month) half-life, while "natural" immunity lasts longer at least by measuring both anti-dody and B-cell immunity.
As of about 2 weeks ago, natural immunity seems to be fading faster, due to the diversity of antigens that may easily change. I seem to recall you agreed with me about this back then,
The spike proteins focus of the vaccine means the virus can't mutate without monkeying with the machinery of it's virulence.
Behold the liturgy of the faithful -- a full 180 degrees from reality, but spoken with confidence and fervor. Do you miss critical thinking at all, or are you so deep in the cult you've made yourself forget?
Pure insults. How I know you don't care about facts at all.
Oh, I do very much care about facts, my dear Sarc. Unfortunately, your support-free party line chanting doesn't qualify.
No, you really don't. See how Don below is engaging in good faith and providing citations?
You're not doing that; you're just bloviating.
About critical thinking, of all things.
Uh huh -- he's bringing you rocks, and you're simply criticizing them without taking a clear affirmative position or citing anything yourself, as is your usual schtick. I got over that game some time ago.
You're a troll, Sarc -- higher-brow than many, but a troll nonetheless. Own it.
If he asks for citations, I'll provide them. Plenty of science about natural immunity versus vaccines.
But he and I know what papers we're talking about.
You, clearly, don't care.
OK, bucko -- going forward, please provide citations for all your bullshit blustering. Standing order. Cool?
"The spike proteins focus of the vaccine means the virus can't mutate without monkeying with the machinery of it's virulence."
The biggest changes that get noted in the variants are changes in various regions of the spike protein. some regions lead to increased virulence, others provide effective masking. The vaccines were formulated primarily again the receptor binding domain.
One should not assume the vaccine induce immunity lasts more than several months and it certainly can't have much to do with the body's recognizing any portain for the virus except the spike protein.
To quote from Gazit et al. "SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well.
The best case of vaccine effectiveness is observed in the UAE with 90% of the total population fully vaccinated. The case level is minimal and breakthrough infections are very uncommon. Of course in an autocratic society, unvaccinated persons can be kept out of the country and all adults and teens can be vaccinated.
First, we're dealing with uncertainties here - single papers are not going to give the answer alone. You and I both know that.
So the Israeli study alone is just that.
And IIRC you yourself said the Israeli study didn't show much about vaccine effectiveness in the general population.
Add in how there are a bunch of studies previously saying that natural immunity wasn't as effective as the vaccine, and I don't think you can be nearly as sure as you are.
I may have been too sure myself this morning, but I don't know where you're coming from, relying on a single study you noted the limitations of in these comments a few weeks ago!
i supposed you saw the NYT article on nov 11. the pfizer study showed decrease to 60%
moreover, i'd believe a study of mre than 1 million persons over one of a couple of thousand.
Moverover almost every country with vaccination eate of 70% or less has had strong breakthough cases consistent with the results in Israel.
I am not relying on a single study but on the results from nearly 100 countries that I have been studying with a data cut off date of Nov 15 to revise my second journal rticle on Covid epidemiology.
Thr study I criticized a couple of weeks ago was not the paper by Gazit et al. but a paper touted by the CDC fron the us with only a few weeks study period and very limited statistics,
But I emphasized again that the data from Israel is consistent with the disease dynamics in every counytry in the EU.
So are you defending Kaz's I'd say the best way to protect the military, a young fit population that is already at little danger from covid, is to build natural herd immunity, and have a sufficient supply of effective anti-covid drugs available to keep the effects manageable.?
Because what I'm hearing is that that you really want is natural immunity plus one dose of vaccine, but I'm still pretty skeptical of any of that.
Until there's more corroboration, I think it's prudent to trust the basic dynamics over any single phenomenological study.
S_0,
I am defending no one. I am relating what my own detailed research has found.
Namely, that infection derived immunity is robust and at lest as long lsting as vaccine derived immunity of covid-naive persons, that until vaccination level get well over 80% one can expect large waves of breakthrough cases with a case fatality rate ≥0.4%.
Therefore, that the US military should take into account the opinions of public health officials in all countries that are officially part of US alliance systems and not rely on the wilful denial of scientific data by the US CDC.
" I'd say the best way to protect the military, a young fit population that is already at little danger from covid, is to build natural herd immunity, and have a sufficient supply of effective anti-covid drugs available to keep the effects manageable. "
Pandemic management tips from half-educated, superstitious, antisocial amateurs are always a treat in modern America.
Who needs epidemiologists, legitimate research institutions, vaccinologists, and government officials when we have the 82nd Chairborne Division of the clinger army is ready to serve?
The current vaccines provide the best protection we can safely give at this time. They are not perfect, but they do reduce the intensity of any later acquired infection of COVID significantly - so much so that many people never realize they caught it. On top of that, hospitalizations and deaths are also significantly reduced.
But these vaccines are not, and will never be, perfect protection. For the past year, there have been strange people on both sides of the vaccination argument that seem to think vaccines are supposed to be magic forcefields. They aren't - you WILL catch some strain of COVID someday - but they're good, and (again) they are the best thing we have right now.
So is this order just forcing the services to compile data that can be used by future plaintiffs, and too bad for the service members courts martialed and / or separated?
Catch 22
In an emergency maybe the government could draft everyone to force everyone to get vaccinated?
Essentially martial law
What emergency?
Don't give them any ideas. The current asshats in office would try it if they thought they could get away with it.
I am a veteran.
On my first day of basic training, I was marched to a line with people standing on both sides that injected vaccines into both arms. This is how it's done. So if the person had no religious exemption to that, I'm all ears as to why this particular vaccine is any different?
The military has strict grooming rules for which there is a set of exemptions people can apply for that cover religious requirements for beards, long hair, and head coverings among other things. Mormons can wear their magic undies and sikhs can wear their turbans. Religious exemptions to the COVID vaccine should align with the statistics for either the initial required vaccinations or those for grooming standards.
Outside of legit religious reasons, these folks are disobeying a direct order and should be subject to dishonorable discharge.
This is not a rational argument. Can every mistake you've ever made be used to justify further mistakes?
There are plenty of historical reasons to be wary of coerced drugging of the military: Edgewood Aresenal, Project 112, Operation Whitecoat, Project Bluebird, MKUltra, ...
your disagreement does not make it irrational.
You lose and will continue to lose on this one.
When you hear differently from the DoD, let us know.
"Outside of legit religious reasons..."
None so far acknowledged. What's your standard for that?
Quite true. My understanding is military are required to get all vaccines, including an annual flu shot. So religious objections are going to be hard to justify other than by membership in the Church Opposing COVID Vaccines.
Aborted fetus cell lines are used to produce flu vaccines?
Not used for Covid vaccine production either.
They were used in the research and development of the Covid vaccines (see https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19_Vaccine_Fetal_Cell_Handout.pdf and Lin, YC., Boone, M., Meuris, L. et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat Commun 5, 4767 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5767).
What meaning is there in "Not used for Covid vaccine production" other than the propagandistic value of trying to separate the development from the propaganda?
It's like copying someone's code, changing the comments and variable names, and insisting that you did not use their code in the production version ... are you, per chance, one of my students?
Oh, horse hockey. Those cell lines are 50 years old.
People seem to have no other objections to the benefits of the willful taking of human life decades ago.
Just consider the benefits of the US having defeated Japan in 1945 after the prompt incineration of 200,000 Japanese civilians
Development != production.
And development of the flue vaccine would use a similar development channel.
So you're just making things up. Or, rather googling for confirmation without context and slamming it into the comment.
If you'd followed your own link, you'd find a list of COVID vaccines that don't use fetal cells in any stage. The two most effective mRNA vaccines used them in final stage testing. The Israeli vaccine used none. So just pick a vaccine that used none and take that one. Crisis averted. Or, wait for the Moderna/Pfizer vaccines to be re-tested using no fetal cell lines. Even the Pope says that it's okay for Catholics to take the mRNA vaccines that used fetal cell lines.
But note that this doesn't avoid the issue of all the other vaccines people take--the large majority of which were also developed with fetal cell lines: rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis A, and shingles to name a few.
I'm a veteran as well. There were exemptions to vaccines based on religious beliefs. There was also work arounds. The problem here is that Biden's Executive order allows for religious exemptions. His orders as Commander in Chief states that there are no "religious exemptions". There are standards for issuing exemptions quoted in this ruling, yet out of all of the requests that have been processed none have been given. Isn't that a bit odd?
What's happening here is that the Chain of Command is hinting that no exemptions be given, while the EO is saying that there is a path for exemptions to be given. That's the military for you.
The Washington Post quoted a Navy spokesperson saying the religious exemptions granted for COVID are in line with other vaccine exemptions provided over the prior seven years. (none.) There are administrative exemptions being given for various reasons including servicemembers in the midst of leaving the service. For someone to get a religious exemption, they would need to show a history of request the exemption from other vaccines and of being members of a faith that routinely request the exemptions.
There is no conspiracy here.
"...the number of those denials in which the chaplain determined that the asserted belief is sincere..."
Chaplains get to "determine" this?
Chaplains who are also military officers. Officers who want to be promoted.
I can only speak about the Navy, since that's where I served. You have these things called "Fitness Reports". Promotions are based on them. Say you have a Chaplin who toed the party line and granted no exemptions. His next fitness report might have something like this in it. "Lieutenant XXXXXX's attention to Duty is far above his contemporaries."
Say you have a Chaplin who grants some exemptions. His next fitness report might have something like this in it. "Lieutenant YYYYYYY's attention to Duty is in line with that of his peers."
Notice the difference. The Promotion Board will.
If the Chaplain's exemptions for COVID are in line with their exemptions for rubella or chickenpox vaccines, then no one will care either way. And as I said up-thread, the Navy's seven year history of religious exemptions, as reported by WaPo, is "none." So if the Chaplains give out zero exemptions for COVID vaccines, you can be sure the servicemembers who requested them have the exact same fetal cell lines already swimming around in their immune systems*.
*The cell lines aren't actually in the vaccines themselves but were used either in research or testing of the vaccines. For the two main mRNA vaccines, the cell lines were used in testing but not development nor manufacturing. Vaccines that used no fetal cell lines are also available, though not as common in the US.
Perhaps military authorities would be less forgiving with respect to disingenuous excuses advanced by contrarians and misfits than others might be?
Considering the Supreme Court ruled in the 1980s that the military can ban wearing a yarmulke — they only allowed because Congress passed a statute permitting it — I think a religious exemption claim from something like a vaccine requirement is going to face an uphill battle.