The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Prosecutorial Discretion For The FAA Mask Mandate
Different flight crews enforce the federal airline mask mandate in very different ways.
Since August, I have been flying on a semi-regular basis. (Indeed, this week I will visit seven airports in four days). I've found that different flight crews enforce the FAA mask mandate in very different ways.
Recently, I flew from Houston to New York. The purser (lead flight attendant) took enforcement to the extreme. (As a general rule, when a flight attendant self-identifies as the "purser," he or she has a bit of a power trip). At the start of the flight, he announced that he was required to issue fines to mask-mandate violators. He went up and down every row and instructed people to wear their masks. There was a child, maybe four or five years old, whose cloth mask kept falling below his nose. The purser gave the kid's parents a new mask that would not fall down. (They all fall down for kids). During the meal service in business class, the purser insisted that we put on our mask between bites and sips. Seriously. If a few moments elapsed after I finished putting food in my mouth, the purser would come over. This purser took his prosecutorial discretion to the absolute extreme of complete enforcement.
My flight back from New York to Houston was very different. These flight attendants mentioned the mask mandate once, and never again. During the meal service, the flight attendants did not say a word when masks were taken off. Children whose masks fell below their noses were ignored. Here, the flight attendants took prosecutorial discretion to other extreme of non-enforcement.
The FAA mask mandate gives flight attendants exercise vast prosecutorial discretion. And the enforcement is uneven. There is nothing new here. Flight attendants routinely enforce rules to different degrees. Will a flight attendant say something if you keep using a large electronic device (laptop) during takeoff and landing? Will a flight attendant say something if you go to the bathroom while the fasten-seatbelt sign is on? (They can't actually stop you from going to the bathroom). Will a flight attendant say something if you put your personal items underneath your own seat, rather than in the seat in front of you? How much attention does the flight attendant demand during exit row briefings? (I no longer sit in exit rows to avoid flight attendant power trips). Do flight attendants actually tell people who are using their phones to turn on airplane mode, and wait for them to do so? And so on.
And for those curious, this week I will hit IAH, LGA, EWR, HOU, SAT, DCA, and IAD.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The first Flight attendent probably believes that covid suppression efforts are effective, while the second flight crew probably recognizes that suppression efforts are largely ineffective and do little to achieve the long term goal.
You may be right about the second crew - especially given how "casually" the nobility treat mask mandates. However, Professor Blackman's comment on the "purser" designation weakens you argument about the first one.
What long term goal? Seems like the only goal is being nasty to people, and that’s an everyday goal for those that do it.
The long term goal is to get immunity through out the population. The 1918 Spanish flu is still with us, but ceased to be a problem after 3 years once herd immunity came into play.
Based on the volume of breakthrough cases which started esculating rapidly in late august, the covid vaccines cant really be considered a vaccine. The tetanis vaccine only requires boosters every 10 years, while the ineffective covid vaccines are effective for -6 months. Based on available sept data, natural immunity from a covid infection is 4x-6x stronger than the vaccines. Reasonables estimates based on the anticipated Oct data, natural immunity will be estimated to be 7-8x stronger.
The best long term strategy is to get natural immunity since it is so much more effective, (at least until a long lasting / effective vaccine is developed.
Thus, the best long term strategy is zero further government intervention in life on COVID grounds.
Based on the word of the renowned virologist and immunologist, ML
"the covid vaccines cant really be considered a vaccine"
Tom, that is just not true. You could make the very same claim about the influenza vaccine ans well as many other vaccines.
"natural immunity from a covid infection is 4x-6x stronger than the vaccines"
there is no such measurement... no not in the Israeli study either
"Reasonables (sic) estimates based on the anticipated Oct data, natural immunity will be estimated to be 7-8x stronger. "
You are just making that up. Are you comparing a very recent recovery from a severe case of COVID-19 with a person vaccinated 8 months ago?
Stop making unequivocal claims without any medical evidence.
Don - I am using Minnesota data which is one of the few states that has data for vaxed and unvaxed individuals.
For Sept and 10days of oct, vaxed individuals comprise approx 30% of the cases, approx 1/3 of hospitlizations and approx 1/3 of the deaths. The reinfection rate has been running approx 1% across the country.
The 4x - 8x is based on the following: Minnesota vaxed % is approx 70%, Minnesota total covid cases is approx 15% of total population. - 30% reinfection /70% vaxed rate = .42; reinfection rate 1%/total cases 15% = .0667. .0667 / .42 = approx 6x
Don if you have better numbers then provide them.
Tom,
As the statistics by states seem to inspire almost instant political discussions of which party the governor belongs to. I have restricted all of my research to nation by nation statistics.
What I can tell you (and unfortunately one cannot post graphs) is that when the vaccination rate exceeds 60% of the total population (including the number of children), in 80% of the countries (including the US) that keep good statistics the case fatality rate tends to rise and the number of new cases per day falls. That is certainly consistent with your statement that the serious cases are mostly among the unvaccinated or immuno-compromised vaccinated. The UK is a gross exception to that pattern.
I have have not seen reliable national data on reinfection rates.
If you have state data, but no national data...
Why not use the state data as Tom suggests....
maryland data - very partial
"A lot of times people may feel it's a rare event that fully vaccinated people die. I happen to be the senior advisor to Governor Hogan in the state of Maryland. In the last 6-8 weeks, more than 40 percent of people who died in Maryland were fully vaccinated," Redfield said,
In a state with 65% addults fully vaccinated
This data is accurate, and in accordance with the Massachusetts data, which is showing approximately 40% of the current infections occurring among the vaccinated.
Don - comment - "You are just making that up. Are you comparing a very recent recovery from a severe case of COVID-19 with a person vaccinated 8 months ago?"
The reinfection rate has been running fairly consistent at approx 1%.
The breakthrough infection rate was running fairly low (5%-15%) up through mid august, when there was a fairly steady rise. The august time frame coincides with the 6-7 months point after the start of the vaccine availability. In Minnesota and in the Israeli study, the reinfection cases are / were approx 25% to 35% of the total active cases.
Tom, look at the Israeli data directly.
There are two spikes. one spike in the CFR mostly likely due to clusters of cases in nonvaccinated persons and a second spike in break through cases when the vaccination rate was greater than 60%.
Some speculate that the first spike was in the Arab population, but I have no evidence of that.
"The reinfection rate has been running fairly consistent at approx 1%."
That rate cannot be consistent with the number of breakthrough infections in the UK which has both a very high vaccination rate and a very large vaccination percentage and more than 13% of the population with reported infections (so at least 25% total previous infections-but that is uncertain).
By the way Tom, I appreciate that our discussion has remained civil despite our clear areas of disagreement.
Don Nico
October.19.2021 at 4:40 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
“the covid vaccines cant really be considered a vaccine”
Tom, that is just not true. You could make the very same claim about the influenza vaccine ans well as many other vaccines."
That is why the flu shot is called a flu shot and not a vaccine!
No Tom,
"CDC recommends use of any licensed, age-appropriate influenza vaccine during the 2021-2022 influenza season. Available influenza vaccines include including quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines [IIV4s], recombinant influenza vaccine [RIV4], or live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4)."
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/flushot.htm
See comments below. That is poor advice especially to anyone who is immuno-compromised
If immunity were the long term goal, the spread of Covid furthers that goal. I think that’s not the long term goal.
Anti-Covid measures haven’t indicated a goal since they gave up on "xxx days to slow the spread". The anti-Covid measures we see now are all backward-looking and pro forma. No one expects a substantial measurable effect from any of them.
"the spread of Covid furthers that goal."
Maybe.
The spread into unvaccinated populations increases the changes of a resilient mutation with the immunity masking of the mu variant and the transmissibility of the delta variant.
Viral evolution is complex and unpredictable.
Unpredictability didn’t stop you from predicting.
And no one making Covid rules has said their rules exist as some sort of mutation countermeasure. It’s just a thing that Branch Covidians say so they don’t have to acknowledge progress.
Ben,
You must read better than that.
I predicted nothing at all. I said that the possibility was wide open. Single patients have been seen infected with 13 different variants.
"Viral evolution is complex and unpredictable."
That is not a prediction. It is an experimental observation.
Learn to distinguish between the two
It is amazing how bad anti-vax arguments are. If immunity were the long term goal, then nuclear annihilation would also further that goal.
But of course immunity isn't the long term goal; minimizing illness and deaths is. Immunity via vaccination is one way of accomplishing that goal. Immunity through the spread of COVID is not.
Unfortunately, from the data out there, vaccination doesn't appear to confer immunity. Resistance...but not immunity.
30-40% of current COVID cases are among the vaccinated.
The first attendant probably recognizes that efforts are successful, while the 2nd probably believes...
There. Just a neat switching of "recognizes" and "believes" between the two parties, and the meaning changes. I'll used this sentence as an example of how subtle language choices can be used in brief-writing at the trial and appellate stages.
"Recognizes" is less than honest, since the individuals aren’t in a position to judge the efficacy of the masks from their personal observations. All they can do is believe what they’re told.
I used recognize [s] since the emperical data shows there is little to no statistical difference in transmission rates between areas with high mask compliance and low mask compliance.
Tom and Ben,
Mask may in general be of questionable efficacy, but when when one is very close (less than ten feet), in a confined space for far more than 15 minutes, every little bit helps.
Only a fool would not comply with that extra bit of precaution even if s/he is vaccinated with a booster or naturally immune with one shot.
Here's to the face-tampon heroes!
Laugh if you will.
If you sit next to me without one, I will insist on a complaint to the captain. But you are allowed to think what you are doing is stupid and useless.
Yeah, the protected need protection from the unprotected by making the unprotected get the protection that has not protected the protected.
I don't care what you think. Neither you nor I know who sitting near you is actually protected under what circumstances.
The difference is that you are arrogant enough to think that you do.
Right, the "party of science" doesn't care about whether or not the masks are effective, and doesn't care about the fact that real breakthroughs are extremely rare. Your silly rules are a religion to you.
Where would the Volokh Conspiracy be without virus-flouting, disaffected warriors for the cause of persecuted White males?
Mask wearing, other than fitted N95 masks, has no statistically significant effect. For those that don't quite realize what this means:
Statistically insignificance means that you cannot tell the difference between the outcome of wearing a mask or not wearing one.
Only a fool (or a True Believer) would insist on that extra bit of precaution when there is no evidence it does anything. It's no different than insisting everyone wear green, or pray before and after.
You don't actually KNOW that.
But if you don't like the rule stay off the flight.
And you don't know that getting on the plane without having drank Sprite doesn't help. You should have to drink Sprite. It's for the children!
Society is better off when people like this are just required to comply with the preferences of qualified people in the context of public safety rather than being permitted anywhere near the driver's seat.
Society is better off when communists are executed.
Telling everyone to drink Sprite is just the sort of meaningless ritual that the Covidians have been mandating. Does it work? They don't know. But someone said it does. So mandate it.
They're like tribesmen listening to the villiage shaman.
Someone with actual expertise said it does. (Where "it" is mask wearing, not Sprite.) And there's an actual plausible causal mechanism to explain why it would. (Where "it" is mask wearing, not Sprite.) Whereas internet loons said lalalalalalalalaIcan'thearyouitdoesn't.
Are these the same experts that have been peddling a new narrative every week? The same ones that told us not to wear masks at the beginning as part of a not so clever lie to save PPE for doctors?
So now you agree that the claim that masks don't help is a lie?
I think masks might help at the margins. But at this point, with a vaccine available, the best way forward is to let the virus run its course. That is through natural immunity, mitigated by the vaccine.
I don't actually KNOW that the sun will rise tomorrow.
But there are many studies on the issue, dating back decades, and the results are clear.
Are you claiming that all of these studies, all of the extensive statistical analysis done on the topic, is wrong?
Or do you simply not like the result and insist on meaningless rituals to make yourself feel better?
I am claiming that there is a wide variation in studies that do not control for biases. I have done studies continually for more than 18 months over SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in 100 countries with a total population of 5.5 billion people.
While there are some trends that are relatively consistent over the large majority of countries, there are also very strong anomalies. What you call meaningless rituals is your opinion. I am the fit to say that for most users who pay no attention to how their mask is put on, removed or disposed of the direct benefit to them is marginal at best.
But if you long at film of air flows from mask with a 1 µm filter properly worn, the decrease in aerosols emiitted to a distance of more than a few feet is minimal. So I don't know how your myrid studies were conducted and what they measured, but I do know about aerodynamics and I trust the studies done my my colleagues who are expert in that area.
So no. I do not bow to your litany of "saints" and I do not believe the CDC comments of the CDC about the influence of co-morbidities that is not substainated by data accounting for more than 5 billion people.
You are welcome to think that position is arrogant, but I don't care what you think about work that you have not seen or have not studied extensively fr as long as this pandemic has gone on.
"...1 µm filter properly worn..." How many do you observe daily with that 'minor' requirement? From personal experience, flying regularly? Perhaps 2% at best? Show your data of all these ordinary citizens wearing such masks effectively. You can't so just shut up Donnie Boy. Or, should I call you Karen?
You have done studies, continuously, for more than 18 months? Where are these studies published?
As a former professional statistician, I'm really interested in getting a chance to review your data, chosen models, and analysis, to see what you came up with. I'd love for the chance to compare them to the data compiled by thousands of other medical researchers who do this sort of thing for a living.
Since your conclusions are different than the literally hundreds of peer-reviewed and published studies, you must have some very strong evidence, and I look forward to being able to read it.
Don Nico
October.19.2021 at 4:36 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
Tom and Ben,
Mask may in general be of questionable efficacy, but when when one is very close (less than ten feet), in a confined space for far more than 15 minutes, every little bit helps.
Only a fool would not comply with that extra bit of precaution even if s/he is vaccinated with a booster or naturally immune with one shot."
Don Nico
October.19.2021 at 4:51 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
"If you sit next to me without one, I will insist on a complaint to the captain. But you are allowed to think what you are doing is stupid and useless."
Don you just acknowledged the very point you were trying to dispute.
Absolutely not, Tom.
It is very clear that the strongest safeguard is being outdoors, far from others. If you are indoors stay away and be in a place with good ventilation and don't stay close for more than 10 minutes.
In a plane, you chip away at each of these safety margins. therefore if double masking buys me 20%, I would double mask.
But more than that, I expect that attendants apply ALL FAA saety mandates whether or not is understand them or am convince of their efficacy or efficiency. In other words, I expect attendant to do their job and I expect my fellow passengers to respect attendent that are doing their job.
The fact that JB, calls enforcing FAA mandates (the whole set) "power trips" shows his poor judgment. I hope that he displays better to his students
Don - you were previously arguing that the covid vaccines were "vaccines"
If they were truely vaccines, then you would not need to throw hissy fits defending the need for all the extra safety protocols needed for the partial vaccines.
Tom,
Not true at all. Most vaccines do not prevent transmission. Even Brett will tell you that.
No amount of anything helps when the people involved don’t have Covid.
BUT you don't know that. Nor does anyone else, unless the person in question has had a PCR test less than 3 days prior and even that is questionable because the infection may not show up for 3 days
Don Nico
October.19.2021 at 5:38 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
BUT you don’t know that. Nor does anyone else, unless the person in question has had a PCR test less than 3 days prior and even that is questionable because the infection may not show up for 3 days"
Those people you just described are a trivial percent of the covid transmitters.
That isn't the right calculation, Tom.
I don't know this number, but you want the number of false negatives 1, 2, and 3 day after exposure.
I do agree that the number is small, but maybe as high as 5% per the UK NHS.
It’s reasonably easy to calculate the likelihood of any individual — especially a vaccinated individual — having Covid and being contagious and being entirely asymptomatic at a given moment. That likelihood is vanishingly small.
And on top of that, masks do very little.
And on top of that, infections are barely dangerous at all now that almost all those at risk are vaccinated.
But you’re going to continue to want little kids to be bullied about Covid for a long, long time, aren’t you? Because when will you ever get another chance like this?
Don Nico is a typical brown shirt who gets his rocks off by bossing people around. they're just like the people demanding people bake them wedding cakes. It's about power, and power for it's own sake.
NI,
I could guess your sexual proclivities also. But I really don't care what you think.
Follow the rule or don't fly. That is good enough for me.
But be a good boy or girl or non-binary and eat your cake and drink your milk
Actual admitted Nazi calling someone else a brown shirt is the height of comedy.
Ben, where did you get your medical degree or PhD in biostatistics?
The calculations are simple. Maybe not simple enough for a lawyer though.
I see that you did not answer a simple direct question.
Where did you get relevant training in medicine or statistics?
Or are you afraid to answer?
We most certainly know that someone who is not infected with 2019-SARS-CoV-2 cannot transmit it to someone else. There is zero debate on this point.
You seem mean, instead, that someone may be infected but not know it and not show symptoms. This is possible, which is better than your original statement - but it a very small risk. The lack of symptoms is the very fact that greatly reduces the possibility of transmission in the first place!
"someone who is not infected with 2019-SARS-CoV-2 cannot transmit it to someone else."
On that we agree.
Toranth, it is very far from clear that persons who are PRE-symptomatic have very small viral loads.
I do suspect (though I have not seen relevant measurements of viral titres) that person who remain asymptomatics have low viral loads and therefore are far less likely to transmit the virus.
We do know that superspreaders can cause large clusters of infection and that they do so while they appear healthy.
So you may say that I am being overly cautious. But when people are locked in close proximity for several or more hours, an abundance of caution is called for.
PREsymptomatic people do have higher viral loads than asymptomatic, but lack the active transmission mechanisms that fully symptomatic people have - which results in significantly reduced case spread. Remember, transmission requires both an adequate viral load AND a safe (for the virus) delivery method. This is why fomite transmission is so low for COVID - it dies easily when left out, even from fully symptomatic high viral load patients.
An "abundance of caution" would equally apply to banning all air travel, or locking people in sealed cells with BSL3+ filters.
All acts you want impose on others for your "caution" need to be balanced against the risk they prevent. Masks prevent nothing. There is no statistical significance there, so there is no point in doing it - it reduces the risk by absolutely nothing.
Ben,
They don't have to believe anything at all.
They do have to do as they are instructed.
The North Korean state police have openings. You should apply. You could skip part of the training.
Wow, Ben.
So are so clever.
You should apply for a job on SNL
It’s not a joke. Making life worse because you’re afraid or because you love treating people badly (and this is your opportunity to get away with it) is the furthest thing from funny.
Ben,
1) Stay at home stay off airplanes and you will not be bothered by this rule.
2) Realize that you have lost this battle and turn your attention to causes with more likely success
The first flight attendant does not have to believe anything except the regulations of her employer. Remember any one who reports an attendant who neglects her employers mandate will result in that attendant not working for some time into the future.
"not working for some time into the future"
Good point. Maybe her children will starve!
That will really turn you on.
No food means they won’t need to take their masks off.
And if the kids starve to death then Don won’t have to worry they’ll infect him with Covid.
Yup, Bob.
Her kids, her choice.
Congrats to the Branch Covidians: bullying small children about masks to very, very slightly lessen the probability that some 80-90 year old might be in danger of Covid.
We could, instead, ask 80 year old travelers and anyone else with Covid concerns to wear N95 masks to keep themselves safe. But too many officious people prefer bullying young children and toddlers.
Don't like it Ben. Then don't fly.
Next time I fly, I will report any attendant who does not enforce his company's rules.
We know you will, Karen.
Just ask to speak to the manager.
I'll also be happy to see you banned from flying when you disobey the attendant, george.
I'll be happy to see you and your fellow brown shirts hanged.
Open wider, Nisiiko. Your betters are not done shoving progress down your bigoted throat, not nearly, and you are not done toeing that line established by the American mainstream against the wishes of clingers.
You get to whine about it as much as you like, of course. You can even talk tough. But you will comply, clinger. As usual.
This is Arthur's idea of progress.
https://breeding.zone/topic/31782-do-you-feel-it-when-ur-pumped-with-cum/
Because you like harming people. You’d make a good re-education camp guard.
Was he always a s**thead like this?
Normally he has an argument. Covid is too important for reason or thought to be allowed to interfere.
Geez, the wild cards stand for Hi, Bob.
I am glad that it hurts you so much to follow the rules.
I barely fly. No skin off my nose either way.
Yet I can still, unlike you, have empathy for those who do.
Not enough to want to keep them as safe as possible from covid while doing so, apparently.
The way to keep people as safe as possible would include mandatory respirators and no eating or drinking.
Everything ultimately requires a weighing of pros and cons. You leftists are frigging morons.
If you think I'm a leftist, then your moron detector needs recalibrating.
COVID has brought out the inner Nazi in most leftists.
Is that the best you can do?
You lost this battle months last November on election day.
It will hurt less if you stop beating your head against the wall
You people are evil tyrants. I hope you get ALS.
Another shithead muted.
"the "purser," he or she has a bit of a power trip"
Just like JB is on a power trip when he says he is a professor at a law school... but does not announce that it is a fifth tier school.
It's so funny how all you can insult him with is his school not being one of your ivy league favorites. If you had any substantial criticisms, you'd use them.
An Ivy pedigree is nothing about which to brag.
Ivy matriculation signifies intellectual flaccidity, hubris, and a healthy dose of Dunning Krueger.
I guess you weren't admitted or even dared to apply.
Yes, a bridge too far....
At least you recognize that.
Morever, you can get just as good an education at a state university for a lot less money.
"I guess you weren’t admitted or even dared to apply."
So f**king what. Either he is right or not, his personal situation does not impact that.
Aw, Bobbie is offended. Poor Bobbie.
Wife cut you off again?
You are being a complete jerk here but glory in it if you want.
Hey, Bob, as I told Ben, you lost this battle 11 months ago. Give it up and move on.
And try to do better than the schoolboy taunts.
Don is being a jerk, and acting like our RAK here.
Actually Mike, it signifies that you were willing to pay enough to buy into good networking.
His school is so far from an :Ivy league favorite, that it is pathetic.
His "power trip" comment is a poor example of critical thinking, just for a starter.
What of substance do you have to say about the topic?
Ivy League favorites? It's just a shitty school. Basically ANY other law school in the country is better than it. You could throw a dart at a map and find the nearest law school and odds are it'd be better than Blackman's law school. So the notion that it'd have to be IvY LeAgUe is just silly. Silly just like you!
"but does not announce that it is a fifth tier school."
Seriously? You're acting like our Reverend here, with the personal attacks.
I hope you reported that purser to the airline....
Professor Blackman, may I suggest upgrading yourself to First? There is very little 'Mickey Mouse' horseshit there, that I have directly observed. Yeah, it costs more. So what. The ability to walk 'fresh' off the plane and be ready to rock and roll after 3-5 hours is almost priceless.
Finally, a sensible alternative!
It is certainly better than second or 3rd class
There ain't no comparison. I can hack two hours in business, that is about the limit of my toleration. After that, it is first. And honestly, after the last three years portfolio performance, I may not bother with coach ever again. I don't fly like I used to, but when I do, I now really appreciate not dealing with bullshit and walking off the plane ready to rock and roll. It is a significant qualitative difference.
"Yeah, it costs more. So what."
What about people who can't afford it. Just have to suffer little tin pot dictators?
Bob from Ohio....Yep.
When you fly coach, there are hassles. That is just the way it is. From the fat, stinky guy whose fat folds literally flow over the armrests; to screaming babies crying for...whatever they cry for; to 'Pout-Raged' fliers who did not get upgraded; to the dolts who brings bags that won't fit in the overhead compartment and stand there like an ass trying to close the overhead compartment door.
Yes, when you fly coach you get more hassles, including the Power-tripping Pursers who can truly make your life very unhappy very quickly. You do get what you pay for.
Now, having said that. I have seen some truly unbelievable shit happen in First.
C_XY,
I have flow 6 million miles and have see and increasing number of jerks and jerkettes who can only spew invective and give other passengers and flight attendants a hard time.
Some, a few sit in first class, but most are the folks who bought the $99 seats and still expect first class service.
Six million miles. Ah, the stories you can tell. I know you have them. 🙂
Not sure why liars seem to like the number 6 million.
Classic Volokh!
They can obey or stay home, Bob.
Spoken like a good little brownshirt.
These little brown shirts will never give up their Plandemic powers
My condolences to anyone in the New York region that will be subjected to one of Professor Blackman's "talks".
What is the relevance of mentioning that you were in business class?
The important thing, as always, is that Blackman put up a long post that let him use the word "I" a lot.
A thought for Josh Blackman. I suspect if you looked into it, you would discover that aircrew on commercial carriers—like ship's officers at sea—enjoy both powers and discretion which might discomfit a libertarian. Think about it for a bit, and you might be able to see how that could be a good thing.
"This purser took his prosecutorial discretion to the absolute extreme of complete enforcement."
I hope you responded by letting the airline know that the flight was miserable because the "flight crew", especially the "purser", were obnoxious jerks.
Dont' mention the masking, just report that the person made the flight unpleasant, and made you not want to fly that airline.
And, of course, you also need to praise the flight crew that weren't a bunch of mask Nazis.
Both those little bits of writing would be far more effective than anything you write here