The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
D.C. Circuit Denies Motion to Block CDC Eviction Moratorium (Updated)
Next stop, Supreme Court?
Last week, a federal district court judge in D.C. refused to block the CDC's current eviction moratorium, noting "the courts hands are tied" given the D.C. Circuit's prior ruling on the subject.
Today, a three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit followed suit, unanimously denying the request. The court's brief, unsigned order noted the prior D.C. Circuit ruling and denied the requested relief. The judges on the panel were Nina Pillard, Neomi Rao, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
In all likelihood, the groups challenging the moratorium will now bring their case to the Supreme Court, where it appears at least five justices are skeptical of the CDC's stated authority. Last time around, at least one justice with that view (Justice Kavanaugh) nonetheless voted against providing equitable relief. We will see if he still feels the same way now.
UPDATE: And, sure enough, the Alabama Association of Realtors, et al. have already filed their Emergency Application with the Supreme Court. (I suspect they were ready with this one.)
[Note: I've fixed a really embarrassing typo: "not" instead of "now" in the last paragraph before the update.]
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"In all likelihood, the groups challenging the moratorium will not bring their case..."
I think you mean, "...will now bring their case..."
Since the D.C. Circuit had upheld the previous, broader moratorium, and the Supreme Court declined to overrule it, this result seems compelled by precedent.
Congratulations, and I’m sure she will be an excellent judge on the DC Circuit. ..BUT you dont have to be Sen Scott to not accept at face value the assertion that anyone growing up in the inner city ghetto has “no choice” except a life of crime drugs etc. I acknowledge the crime, violence, danger and adversity omnipresent, but to write off any role of personal responsibility is at the heart of many political debates today in America is, at best an exaggeration.
https://dissertationwritingservice.vip/