The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Reflections on the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution
A compendium of many of my previous writings on these topics, which remain relevant today.

Over the years, I have written a number of Independence Day pieces. Many of them have obvious continuing relevance to such issues as identity politics, nationalism, immigration, the role of slavery in American history, and others.
In this post, I compile what I hope will be a useful list of links to those works. Enjoy!
"The Declaration of Independence and the Case for Non-Ethnic Secession," July 4, 2009.
"The Declaration of Independence and the Case for a Polity Based on Universal Principles," July 4, 2017.
"The Universalist Principles of the Declaration of Independence," July 4, 2019.
"The Case Against the Case Against the American Revolution," July 4, 2019. A rebuttal to longstanding claims - advanced by critics on both right and left - that the Revolution did more harm than good.
"Slavery, the Declaration of Independence and Frederick Douglass' 'What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?'", July 4, 2020. Douglass's famous speech sheds light on some of America's greatest evils - but also on the great good done by the Revolution and Founding.
"Juneteenth and the Universalist Principles of the American Revolution," June 19, 2021. Why there is no inconsistency in celebrating both July 4 and the abolition of slavery. Indeed, the two are mutually reinforcing.
"Immigration and the Principles of the Declaration of Independence," July 4, 2021.
UPDATE: I have updated the above to include today's post on immigration and the Declaration.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In his Case Against the Case Against, Ilya forgets to say what the beef was really about. It was not ideals of Greek democracy rising against a monarch 3000 miles away, with no influence on governance whatsoever. It was because taxes doubled from 1% of GDP to 2% of GDP. Imagine those Founders today. They would be deploying nuclear weapons against the oppressor for the whopping 24% wasted on worthless government today, a wholly owned subsidiary of the lawyer profession, with its stupid self dealt immunities.
Why did taxes go up? Because the military campaign was running out of money. What military campaign? The one against the Indians, to protect the lands and slaves of the lawyer Founders, lawyer dumbasses.
This shit is from high school AP Am Hist of decades ago. Ilya's IQ is likely 40 points higher than mine. Why can't he understand it? The law school experience caused severe brain damage, and made him stupider than a kid in Life Skills learning to eat with a spoon. That kid would make a far better Supreme Court Justice than any on the bench now. He would have common sense. He could listen if things were well explained. He would not be enchained by lawyer rent seeking. The writing of his decisions would be clearer, and not filled with that awful lawyer garbage talk. The clarity of his decision would comply with the Fifth Amendment Procedural Due Process right to notice.
They were called Whigs because they wore those things on their heads.
Those are wigs. Whigs was affectionate for Whigamores, Scottish rebels.
Whiiiiishhhhhh!
Remember, the Declaration is a statement of insurrection.