The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
President Biden's European Cybertour
Episode 367 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
We could not avoid President Biden's trip to Europe this week. He made news (and perhaps a little progress) on cybersecurity at every stop. Nick Weaver and I dig into the President's consultations with Vladimir Putin, which featured veiled threats and a modest agreement on some sort of continuing consultations on protecting critical infrastructure. Jordan Schneider sums up the G7 and NATO statements aligning with U.S. criticisms of China. And our newest contributor, Michael Ellis, critiques the EU-U.S. consultations on technology, which featured a complete lack of U.S. resolve in seeking an outcome on transatlantic data flows that would preserve US intelligence capabilities.
Michael also recaps the latest fallout from the Colonial Pipeline ransomware shutdown – new regulatory initiatives from TSA and a lot of bipartisan regulatory proposals in Congress. He's not as supportive as I am. In that context, I explain the very unusual (or, maybe, all too usual) meaning given to "bipartisanship" on Capitol Hill.
Nick is not exactly mourning the multiple hits now being suffered by ransomware insurers, from unexpected losses to the ultimate in concentrated loss – gangs that hack the insurer first and then systematically extort all its ransomware insurance customers.
Jordan sums up China's new data security law. He suggests that, despite Western reporting, which emphasizes a "government control of data" narrative, the motive for the law may be closer to the motive for data protection laws in the West – consumer suspicion over how private data is being used. I'm less convinced, but we have a good discussion of how bureaucratic imperatives and bureaucratic competition work in the Peoples Republic of China.
Michael and Nick dig into the White Paper on FISA applications published by Adam Klein, outgoing chairman of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Notably, to my mind, the White Paper doesn't support the Justice Inspector General's suggestion that the FISA process is riddled with error. The paper does call urgently for renewal of the expired FISA section 215 authority, and it suggests several constructive changes to the FISA paperwork flow.
In quick hits, Michael brings us up to date on the FCC's contribution to U.S. decoupling from China: a unanimous vote to exclude Chinese companies from the U.S. telecom infrastructure and a Fifth Circuit decision upholding the FCC's exclusion of Chinese companies from federal subsidies for U.S. telecom carriers. Finally, Jordan reminds us just how much progress China has made in exploring space.
And More!
Download the 367th Episode (mp3)
You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!
The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another area of utter lawyer failure. Hi, lawyer dipshits, the deceased have a low recidivism rate. All hackers, their families, friends, neighbors, get the grenade launched from a drone, anywhere in the world. Have an app that finds them, sends the drone on the spot. Googleknows their every breath, word, and bodily activity, not just their location. Seize Google in civil forfeiture to get the information.
On the same day Trump told the international press that he rejected the unanimous conclusion of his intelligence agencies and declared that Russia hadn't interfered with the 2016 campaign, he said he and Putin would form a joint cybersecurity force. What happened to that? Sounded like a good idea. Is Biden following up?
To be fair, none of the recent presidents have faired well towards Russia.
From the WaPo link:
"The modest technocratic gains stand in contrast to the grander ambitions of previous presidents, who sought fundamentally to overhaul the United States’ troubled relationship with Russia.
President George W. Bush famously looked into Putin’s eyes and got a “sense of his soul,” only to end his presidency with Russia’s invasion of the former Soviet Republic of Georgia.
President Barack Obama’s top diplomat presented her Russian counterpart with a red “reset” button in 2009 — but the relationship deteriorated over Russia’s interventions in Syria and Ukraine, and the harboring of U.S. intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden.
President Donald Trump came into office openly admiring Putin and vowing to improve relations with Russia, but his cultivation of the Russian leader, including accepting his assurances that Russia had not interfered in the 2016 election, never translated into any change in Kremlin policies across a host of contentious issues."
As we know, it takes two to tango and Russia certainly isn't in the mood to negotiate - and honestly doesn't need to either.
Can't blame Hillary Clinton. She offered an olive branch which was refused. She fought back, which explains why Putin helped Trump defeat her in 2016. Putin wanted someone who wouldn't fight back.
GWB, as usual, was ill-informed, lazy and incompetent. Though unlike Trump, he was not a bad person, and not in hock to the Russians as Trump was.
"She fought back"
Hilarious. Did she throw more mislabeled buttons at him?
"This time this is my fight song
Take back my life song
Prove I'm alright song
My power's turned on
Starting right now I'll be strong."
Explain why Putin preferred Trump to Hillary.
He didn't. Its just your delusion.
Sh*t stirring is not favoring. He just wanted to bait the rubes, looks like found one in you.
I suggest that you listen to all four hours of the Oliver Stone Putin interviews.
Understandable. Trump wants a Trump Tower in Moscow.
https://news.yahoo.com/biden-white-house-pauses-ukraine-205121753.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/biden-lifts-us-sanctions-on-major-russian-pipeline/ar-AAKaRHA