The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: June 15, 1804
6/15/1804: The 12th Amendment is ratified.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
". . . The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted. . . . "
Remember the fun days when some people thought this statement authorized VP Pence to decertify the results?
"Trump went on to say that Pence has 'several options under the U.S. Constitution.' He can decertify the results or send them back to the states for change and certification,' Trump said. 'He can also decertify the illegal and corrupt results and send them to the House of Representatives for the one vote for one state tabulation.'"
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-he-pence-in-total-agreement-vp-has-power-to-block-certification-of-illegal-election
One of our major parties doesn't care about democracy, that's where we're at right now.
Who is this "we" kemosabe?
Americans.
Regular or hyphenated?
Yes.
So inclusive.
Not by any stretch a part of "Supreme Court history".
June 15, 2020: Bostock v. Clayton County: Title VII applies to gay & transgender
June 15, 1982: Plyler v. Doe: can't deny public education to undocumented children
June 15, 1953: Rosenberg v. United States: refused to stay Julius and Ethel Rosenberg's execution
It took me less than 5 minutes to compile the above.
But you billed 45 minutes...
I am mildly surprised that Prof. Barnett has not removed his name from this 'academic work' by now. Perhaps he figures Georgetown would be disinclined to hold a conservative professor to account for shoddy work, applying a special leniency in the case of a strident right-winger on a strong, legitimate, mainstream school's faculty.
So funny that this little throwaway series invokes such ANGER from certain people.
How DARE he not do what I want!