Dorian Gray's portrait is apparently stored behind the Great Firewall

Episode 363 of the Cyberlaw Podcast


Paul Rosenzweig kicks off the news roundup by laying out the New York Times's brutal story on the many compromises Tim Cook's Apple has made with an increasingly oppressive Chinese government. There is no way to square Apple's grandstanding opposition to US national security measures with its quiet surrender to much more demanding Chinese measures. I suggest that the disparity can only be explained if Tim Cook is in fact Dorian Gray and storing his portrait behind the Great Firewall.

Ransomware hasn't stopped making news, Paul tells us, with Irish hospitals the latest to take the fall. Nate Jones assesses the likelihood (low) that governments will effectively ban  payment of ransomware. And Paul points out that, while cryptocurrency may be facilitating crime, at least it's also warming the planet, as an entire American power plant is taken out of mothballs to power cryptocurrency mining operations.

Governments are increasingly cracking down on cryptocurrency, and Paul gives us one week of news in new regulation: China has reiterated its opposition to unregulated access to crypto. The IRS is threatening action against unreported transactions in cryptocurrency. And Hong Kong plans to restrict crypto exchanges to professional investors.

Another 60+ pages from the FISA court approving the executive branch's section 702 procedures. With Nate on the job, you don't need to read it all, or rely on the ideologically motivated criticism of privacy groups. Nate tells us that in approving the 702 procedures the FISA court has much less leeway than a court usually does in reviewing federal agency action (with a hat tip to a good analysis by NSA alum George Croner). 

Jamil Jaffer bemoans the enthusiasm sweeping Europe for sticking it to US (but not Chinese) tech companies under a variety of competition law theories. Google has been fined just over €100 million by Italy's antitrust watchdog for abuse of a dominant market position in Android auto apps. And Germany is readying big guns for an attack on Amazon's market dominance. I point out that American policyholders seem to share this enthusiasm, at least judging from the questions the presiding judge in Epic v. Apple posed this week to Tim Cook.

Nate and I explore Apple's apparent decision to let Parler back into the app store. (And, given the enthusiasm for regulating such dual-facing markets like the app store on antitrust grounds, that decision would be wise.) But Apple is still demanding that Parler block speech that Parler doesn't think it should be blocking.

We wrap up with a few quick hits:

  • Looking for a cheap way to defeat ransomware?  Brian Krebs has a "might not work but what do you have to lose?" idea: install a Russian keyboard layout on your computer (although with my luck, the ransomware will translate all my files into Russian).
  • Andy Greenberg has a good retrospective on the OG supply chain hack: the Chinese theft of RSA's core security seeds.
  • Dangling the other shoe: The UK's head of MI5 isn't mincing words. Ken McCallum is accusing Facebook of giving a 'free pass' to terrorists by adopting end-to-end crypto for its messaging app. Sooner or later, this is going to end in tears.
  • And we all agree that the Biden administration was lucky to persuade Matt Olsen to leave Uber to become head of DOJ's National Security Division.

And More!

Download the 363rd Episode (mp3) 

You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!

The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.


NEXT: Can Conspiring to Engage in a Legal Act Be Actionable "Civil Conspiracy"?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Tim Cook’s behavior is completely consistent and can easily be squared.

    In the United States, he is impressing the people he needs to impress and saying the thjngs he needs to say to gain influence and make money in the United States. In China, he is impressing the people he needs to impress and saying the things he needs to say to gain influence and make money in China. How is his behavior in the two places the slightest bit different?

    In countries where the culture finds fat women sexy, ads will show fat women. In countries where the culture finds thin women sexy, ads will show thin women. You think the sexy female type ads reflect the CEO’s personal taste in women?

    Then why in the world would you think a CEO would be so stupid, so uncommitted to the company, ao selfish, as to have the “our values” pronouncement type ads reflect the CEO’s personal values? To think so shows a complete lack of comprehension of how business works.

    1. It’s as if the entire profession of marketing -whose principle job is to find a message that will resonate with the market and make potential customers feel good about buying the product - didn’t exist? . You think marketers and the people who hire them would be so grossly unprofessional as to actually give a personal shit about the message?

      It would be like believing lawyers actually believe their clients are in the right just because they say so. Exactly the same kind and level of naivete and a similar gross misunderstanding of what being a professional actually means. Lawyers say their clients are in the right because they are paid to and because they think it’s their job to do so. Exactly the same here. Tim Cook is not exactly running Apple pro bono.

      1. "I suggest that the disparity can only be explained if Tim Cook is in fact Dorian Gray and storing his portrait behind the Great Firewall."

        The homosexual traitor is kowtowing to the Chinese Commie Party to access its market, and to enrich Apple and himself. All the tech billionaires are doing the same. The lockdown was a hyped fruad scheme to take down our economy, and to get rid of Trump. As a bonus, these billionaires added $1.7 trillion to their wealth. Those of China, running the Chinese Commie Party made $2 trillion. Ours are jealous of the Chinese Commie oligarchs, who do not a Republican opposition, or theirs was executed long ago .

  2. Get in here:
    >Belgian anon uses a bot & 750k+ email addresses, to change first names of blacks with Walmart accounts to "nigger."
    >Walmart automatically sends out welcome emails with "Welcome, nigger" in the headline
    my sides

  3. I was listening to one of your recent podcasts yesterday and I heard a reference to "Roscoe Pound's" office at St. Elizabeth's. Uhh. Maybe you meant Ezra Pound---the poet. Roscoe Pound's office was in Langdell Hall. Pound was the former director of the Nebraska botanical survey and also a lawyer.

  4. I cant stand this podcast - why is this being promoted on a supposed libertarian site??? NPR or NYT would be better fit. Bureaucratic apologists at every opportunity. Anti-crypto and pro-censorship.

Please to post comments