ExpressO Submission Service Will Shut Down on June 30

Over the past decade, Scholastica has completely overtaken ExpressO


In 2008, when I submitted my first article to law reviews, ExpressO by BEPress was the leading service. At the time, some journals still accepted paper submissions, but the preferred method was electronic through ExpressO. The process was straightforward. Professors with academic accounts could submit to an unlimited number of journals for a flat fee. This model led to a torrent of submissions. Journals would get blanketed with far too many articles. After all, there was no incentive to budget with a free-for-all plan.

Over the past decade, the landscape has shifted. I first became aware of Scholastica, an alternate submission platform in 2013. At the time, the nascent system allowed law reviews to ask authors about race and other demographic information. The California Law Review and NYU Law Review made that field mandatory. (I wrote about the issue here, here, here, here, and here). I soon became much more familiar with Scholastica. The model was different. Each submission would cost a flat fee of $6.50. The interface was also much snappier, and easier to use. And the site made it far easier for authors to communicate with editors.

Year after year, more journals were added to Scholastica, and more journals left Expresso. In recent years, few of the top 100 journals remained on Expresso. It was only a matter of time before Expresso had to shut down. Now it has happened.

My librarian circulated this email from Expresso:

After nearly two decades of serving the law community, this will be the last submission season for ExpressO.

This was not an easy decision. However, we are moving on and looking to the future, focusing on growing our premier institutional repository platform, Digital Commons (DC) and Expert Gallery Suite (EGS).

We are tremendously proud to have served authors, editors, and institutions, and we wholeheartedly thank the community for making ExpressO a success.

To help mitigate impact to our users, our final season will be phased accordingly:

March 31: Last day to submit to law reviews.

June 30: Complete service shutdown.

While March 31 will be the last day to submit your articles for publication consideration, all accounts, including those for law reviews, will remain open and accessible until June 30. This allows users to continue to manage their submissions, make and accept offers, and download submission information.

Now Scholastica has an effective monopoly. I hope the quality of service does not diminish.

NEXT: Cancel Culture and Freedom

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. What do they do to be entitled to the $6.50 and why can't you just email a .pdf or .docx file directly to the journal? I can't see Scholastica being able to offer any function more than either of these formats (with the related Adobie or Office software) offers, including collaborative editing abilities.

    Of course this is more an issue in my field than with Law Reviews, but the content is produced, for free, by professors and then the journal charges exorbitant prices to license it back to the IHEs that are employing the professors (and, collectively, paid to produce it).

    It made sense, sorta, when there was the logistics of producing and distributing paper copies but now that it's electronic that really can't be justified anymore. And then librarians worry about the fact that they don't possess the back issues -- they lose it all if they end the subscription.

    Higher Education is going to have to deal with this at some point.

Please to post comments