Today in Supreme Court History: November 29, 2004

11/29/2004: Randy Barnett argues Gonzales v. Raich.

Randy Barnett argues Gonzales v. Raich

 

Comments

[Brett Bellmore]

Oral argument transcript.

He starts talking on the bottom of page 25.

[Dan Schiavetta]

Is this drawing accurate? Did Randy interrupt Ginsburg?

(was this mansplaining?)

[Brett Bellmore]

That was actually a response to Souter, the word balloons do not correspond to the actual flow of argument.

[DaivdBehar]

Bunch of bookworms arguing about subjects they know shit about. Meanwhile, we have to live by the awful judgments of these know nothing, Ivy indoctrinated, big government scum bags.

[William_Zanzinger]

Did Barnett miss a chance to persuade Scalia?

Or was Scalia just so anti-marijuana that he was willing to voluntarily strengthen the government’s power under the Commerce Clause, just to own the hippies?