The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"The Modesty of Our Lexicographers" (Well, 1846 Lexicographers)
From the report of Edgar v. McCutchen, an 1846 Missouri Supreme Court case:
McCutchen sued Edgar for slander. The slanderous charge was carnal knowledge of a mare, and the word "fuck" was used to convey the imputation. After the verdict for the plaintiff, a motion made in arrest of judgment, for the reason that the word used to convey the slander, was unknown to the English language, and was not understood by those to whom it was spoken ….
Per Curiam.
Because the modesty of our lexicographers restrains them from publishing obscene words, or from giving the obscene signification to words that may be used without conveying any obscenity, it does not follow that they are not English words, and not understood by those who hear them; or that chaste words may not be applied so as to be understood in an obscene sense by every one who hears them.
Makes sense to me.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Language is wonderful and mysterious.
-Mark Harris, The Southpaw
Fair enough, though I'm puzzled by the implication that someone was trying to have carnal knowledge of an ocean. Takes all sorts, I suppose.
Mr. D.
Especially one 230,000 miles away.
At least it wasn't an ewe.
Goddamned bowdlerized lexicography.