The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Supreme Court Will Close to the Public
Social Distancing not enough for SCOTUS
Yesterday, I speculated that the Supreme Court may hold oral arguments without spectators. Today, the Supreme Court announced that it would close to public. Here is the announcement on the Court's homepage:
Out of concern for the health and safety of the public and Supreme Court employees, the Supreme Court Building will be closed to the public from 4:30 p.m. on March 12, 2020, until further notice. The Building will remain open for official business, and case filing deadlines are not extended under Rule 30.1.
It isn't clear if the Court will partially re-open on March 23 to hold oral arguments.
SCOTUSBlog notes that the Supreme Court shuttered in October 8, 1918 during the Spanish Flu outbreak. The Court resumed arguments in November 1918.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I can live with SCOTUS being closed to the public, but did they have to stop playing hockey? That really hurts.
Double whammy for me, I was going to a hockey game next Saturday and then to the Court the Tuesday after. Probably lots of fun games to watch on NHL.tv, tho, if I really start jonesing and have to settle for watching games that don't involve the Red Wings, tho...
At least for now, tho, I'm still only a third of the way into the Miracle on Ice that I started watching a week ago. Probably ought put that on for now.
Watching old classic Red Wings games would probably be more fun than watching this season's team. For instance you could watch them sweep my Flyers in the 1997 finals.
🙂 Nostalgia is a well best plumbed in moderation.
That said, I'm not actually sure if the normal NHL.tv subscription includes access to historical games any more, so I may not have that option now unless I shell out more money for another service. Which I certainly could, but it's super-unlikely I ever would.
I'd pay to watch them play. I suppose you'd have to have four on each team and one referee.
Apparently CJ Roberts is only willing to call balls and strikes, he's not willing to step into an on ice fistfight between Breyer and Alito.
If only we had some sort of technology to transmit audio and moving pictures to anybody in the US to still experience oral argument...
That's crazy talk.
*pours one out for his dreams of attending _Google v. Oracle_*