The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Che Guevara, Donald Trump, Public Citizen (Founded by Ralph Nader), and Copyright Law
A fun copyright controversy.
From Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen (Consumer Law & Policy Blog):
The personal and commercial heirs of the deceased photographer Korda, best known for the iconic photograph of Che Guevara that has adorned Tshirts and posters displayed by young admirers for fifty years, have issued a takedown demand to Liberty Maniacs over its sales of parody items that display the photo's cap and hair but replace Guevara's visage with, alternately, Donald Trump and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Advancing claims both under the doctrine of moral rights and under copyright law, Randy Yaloz, a New York lawyer based in Paris who proudly identifies himself as "combative" (but wrote using an letterhead identifying himself as an adjunct professor at his alma mater, New York Law School, where he does not currently teach), demands both that the parodies be taken off the market and that the parodist pay damages.
In a response letter sent this morning, we have explained that moral rights are not enforceable in the United States, that the First Amendment protects the right of parody, and that any copyright claims would be defeated by fair use. The lawyer has not answered my question about whether he is trying to stop the production of Tshirts that carry the Korda photo adoringly (albeit without license fee), or if copyright law is just an excuse to suppress critical uses of the photo, in which case Liberty Maniac (whose parodies I have been pleased to protect against campaign committees for Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, as well as the NSA and TSA), could have a claim for copyright misuse.
Paul's letter is a characteristically readable and professional-yet-pugnacious; an excerpt from the concluding paragraph:
(I should note, for the sake of precision, that Ralph Nader hasn't been officially involved with Public Citizen since 1980; but the juxtaposition of him, Guevara, and Trump was too much to resist. I should also note that this post was blogged using the highest cord in the land, here at the U.S. Supreme Court library.)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I ADORE the juxtaposition.
I just got paid $6784 working off my workstation this month. Also, on the off chance that you surmise that is cool, my separated from companion has twin little children and made over $9k her first month. It feels so great profiting RE when other individuals need to work for such a great deal less.
This is my main thing.========>> http://earny.xyz/MADcKp1e2t
You just made my day. Thank you. Love the shirt. Love the demand letter. Love your reply.
I believe the reply is from Paul Alan Levy, not our Professor.
ICYMI
Trump got a preliminary injunction in Cali in the case about his tax returns.
Bush nominee, other Bush nominee, Trump nominee, or Reagan nominee?
Bush nominee.
But I seem to remember that there are no Obama judges?
Prof. Volokh, I enjoy your sense of humor, thank you.
Just bought one.
Moral rights?
Moral owner?
What the heck do these things even mean? At first I thought this was some sort of rhetorical flourish, but evidently French law recognizes moral rights, and so does the US to an extremely limited extent.
There are other cases where musicians tried to deny use of their music by pols they didn't like, but were denied by the court because the purpose of copyright was to earn them money, not not earn money, but it hasn't been to the SC yet afaik.
An additional complication is that there are compulsory licensing schemes in place for music. Not sure if those schemes would potentially cover the use of the music by political campaigns.
Very nice response from Mr Levy. Reminds me of the famous Cleveland Browns reply to a letter of complaint. In modern times it might be, "some asshole has hacked your email account. Thought you should know."
Prof. Volokh - There's a bad link to the NSA/TSA post. There's an extra ")" on the end.
Link should be:
https://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2013/10/nsa-compounds-its-assaults-on-privacy-by-attacking-critical-speech.html
The letter is a great example of telling someone to go to hell and leaving them with nothing to say.
I'm curious is Paul from Texas? 😉
I'd say the t-shirts are more a parody of Fitzpatrick's stylized Che portrait based on the Korda picture so shouldn't it be up to Fitzpatrick?
By that I mean wouldn't it be Fitzpatrick who owns the work being parodied.
That's an interesting point that I have absolutely nothing to contribute to.
Supporters of Che, claiming something moral?
BWA HA HA HA HA!
So, like a Hitler Appreciation League, just redder?
If it's OK to wear a Che Guevara t-shirt, it's OK to wear a Himmler t-shirt. They were equally murderous, only Himmler's resources were greater.
Pretty sure that's the joke. He's using a cord in the Supreme Court library, not posting from the Supreme Court basketball court.
jph12: Yes, that's the joke -- a very little joke.
mad_kalak: My laptop was plugged in, and I was using a hotspot through my phone, which was plugged in to my laptop to avoid running out of power. So there.
So the cord was mixed in its operation?