MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

VOLOKH CONSPIRACY

Mostly law professors, blogging on whatever we please since 2002 · Hosted by The Washington Post, 2014-2017 · Hosted by Reason 2017 · Sometimes contrarian · Often libertarian · Always independent

Request for local counsel in Washington State

Amicus brief on electoral college discretion

[Update: We now have local counsel. Thank you to everyone who volunteered!]

Currently before the Washington Supreme Court is a case involving the freedom of choice of members of the Electoral College. My Independence Institute colleage Prof. Rob Natelson and I would like to file an amicus brief in the case. Since neither Rob nor I are admitted in Washington, we are searching for a Washington attorney who would like to serve as local counsel, and take care of filing the brief. If there are costs associated with the filing, we can cover them.

The brief focuses on the text and original meaning of the presidential elector provisions in the original Article II, and in the Twelfth Amendment. The brief argues that presidential electors have the discretion to vote their conscience. Accordingly, a state legislature may not force electors to vote for particular candidates. In 2016, several Washington electors on the Hillary Clinton slate attempted to vote for a different candidate, but were blocked by the Washington Secretary of State, who was enforcing a Washington statute that presidential electors must vote for whomever wins the popular vote in the state.

Of course there are various pro/con policy arguments about the Washington statute. In our view, the Washington Supreme Court should at least be informed about the text and original meaning of the relevant constitutional provisions.

The brief will be similar to one that we filed this summer in the Tenth Circuit, involving Colorado electors. I summarized that brief in a VC post at the time.

If you would be interested in serving as local counsel, please email me: david at i2i.org.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • SMP0328||

    "In 2016, several Washington electors on the Hillary Clinton slate attempted to vote for a different candidate, but were blocked by the Washington Secretary of State, who was enforcing a Washington statute that presidential electors must vote for whomever wins the popular vote in the state."

    Washington State law does not block an elector from voting contrary to his pledge, but it does subject such an elector to a fine of up to $1,000. That's what happened to the four electors who together gave three electoral votes to Colin Powell and one to Faith Spotted Eagle, instead of four to Hillary Clinton.

  • Eddy||

    Let me call my buddy Seattle Sal, he's a lawyer who represents anyone, including serial killers.

    ...No, he said he wouldn't represent someone who voted against Hillary.

  • Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland||

    The opportunities for chicanery -- sneaking a faithless elector past voters -- constitute one of the reasons it is time to dump the Electoral College.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online