The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Max Boot on paying ransom, past and present
An interesting Wall Street Journal op-ed by Max Boot (I've provided the Google search because that's not covered by the Journal paywall). Boot notes that America has indeed paid ransom on various occasions in the past:
"No ransom for hostages" is a sound principle but one that has often been violated. The U.S. has paid ransom for hostages, with mixed results, since the early days of the republic.
But he concludes, I think persuasively, that this is not a wise approach:
It is regrettable, indeed infuriating, that so many U.S. allies pay ransom, which encourages more hostage-taking and more terrorism in general. The New York Times estimates that al Qaeda and its various affiliates earned more than $125 million from hostage-taking between 2008 and 2014. That makes kidnapping a major - perhaps the major - revenue stream for many of these groups. Paying ransom subsidizes violent extremists to make war on the rest of us.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?