Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Occupational Licensing

Why Do So Many Jobs Require a License?

Becoming a taxidermist or hair braider shouldn't involve costly hurdles.

Andrew Heaton | 8.22.2025 10:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
HD Download

Around 20 percent of American workers must hold a professional license to do their job. Why? 

Andrew Heaton has an answer. And it's infuriating.

NEXT: Why Does the Government Run Air Traffic Control?

Andrew Heaton is a producer at Reason. He is the author of, most recently, Tribalism Is Dumb: Where It Came From, How It Got so Bad, and What To Do About It.

Occupational LicensingComedyProtectionismJobsCompetitionRegulationGovernment
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   10 months ago

    A license is still not required to be an editor at a CUCLL publication.

    Log in to Reply
    1. f7b155e   10 months ago

      Editing and writing are engaging in speech. The First Amendment prohibits government intrusion on speech.

      Log in to Reply
      1. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

        And yet they do it 24/7 after taking an oath before invisible fiends to uphold and defend the Constitution they spit on. Why? Because the looters have convinced the programmable that voting for what you want and getting it via spoiler vote clout is "losing."

        Log in to Reply
  2. Longtobefree   10 months ago

    Because so many governments want to charge fees.
    Because so many government officials want to protect their buddies from competition.
    The remainder of the list is left as an exercise for the reader.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Stupid Government Tricks   10 months ago

      Bureaucrats have nothing concrete by which to measure their success, only subordinates, budgets, and regulations, and if they don't constantly issue new regulations, they risk being thought obsolescent.

      And government is not only nothing but bureaucrats, but they have a monopoly and coercion at their beck and call.

      Log in to Reply
      1. charliehall   10 months ago

        The problem is that pretty much every statute enacted in the past 90 years requires regulations to be written to enforce the statute. The Administrative Procedure Act was enacted in 1946 to constrain the bureaucracy, and because of that law it now takes a long time to write and promulgate those regulations. It was enacted basically in response to FDR's perceived excesses during the Great Depression and WW2. Both of those perceived excesses were probably necessary during the Great Depression and the War, but both Republicans and Democrats wanted to guard against a future President who would abuse that power -- someone like Trump. The Administrative Procedure Act requires that regulations be in accordance with the language of the statute and with the Constitution and the courts are empowered to overturn regulations that violate either. And indeed many of Trump's Executive Orders were overturned by the courts because they violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

        Log in to Reply
  3. Public Entelectual   10 months ago

    There was a fracas a few year's ago when an unlicensed taxidermist from New York brought home the head of a whale he decapitated in Massachusetts.

    It blew over, and they made him Secretary of Health & Human Services.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Chumby   10 months ago

      Was there a porpoise to your post?

      Log in to Reply
      1. TrickyVic (old school)   10 months ago

        Blubber

        Log in to Reply
    2. SQRLSY   10 months ago

      That's a whale of a tale! I personally have been swallowed by a whale, butt I don't know if I can swallow THAT whale of a tale!

      Log in to Reply
    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   10 months ago

      Sounds fishy to me.

      Log in to Reply
    4. charliehall   10 months ago

      Much taxidermy work also requires a federal license.

      I only learned that in the past five minutes after reading your comment.

      I wonder whether Theodore Roosevelt had to get a taxidermy license. His home in Oyster Bay, NY, is full of dead animals!

      Log in to Reply
  4. Vernon Depner   10 months ago

    If it's your own wife or child being stuffed, don't you want your taxidermist to be properly certified?

    Log in to Reply
    1. acda999   10 months ago

      Ofcourse I don't.

      The last thing I want while greiving over the loss of a family member is to deal with an uncompetitive practitioner defended against malpractice by a board that the practitioner regularly gives money to.

      Log in to Reply
  5. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

    Honestly, most of it is just tied up in the fact that in the old days (say, 30 or more years ago), a license was an indicator that the person had at least a basic level of competency, because a lot of trade occupations had an expectation of skills to do the job on a daily basis. Even in tech, you're still expected to take on a lot of different training programs for things as your career progresses, because it makes you more employable as the technology itself evolves.

    Post-Y2K, getting a license isn't necessarily about demonstrating basic competency, it's simply pencil-whipping a test to get your Good Boi stamp of approval from the petty bureaucrats so you aren't "left behind."

    Log in to Reply
    1. Longtobefree   10 months ago

      "Even in tech, you're still expected to take on a lot of different training programs for things as your career progresses, because it makes you more employable as the technology itself evolves."

      Unless your career started in the early seventies. Then you learned COBOL, IBM utilities, and spent the next 45 years doing the same thing. The language evolved, but a few minutes a month reading manuals was all the continuing education you needed.

      Three notes:
      1970 was when the industry, through banks processing 30 year mortgages, knew there would be a major issue in the 1999/2000 transition.
      1970 was also when the industry had to transition from one digit year fields to two digit years.
      1972 was the first year we were told COBOL was dying out and we all "had" to learn the latest thing.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   10 months ago

        Yeah, except that rapidly changed after the internet took off.

        Log in to Reply
      2. charliehall   10 months ago

        I was a COBOL programmer in 1981-1982.

        Log in to Reply
  6. TJJ2000   10 months ago

    Licensing ... How politicians try to cover-up their politician driven education failures
    ...because 'Gun' packing politicians are Gods and they know everything. /s

    For anyone who isn't a politician a $50 Cisco Certification says more than $250,000 in Commie-Indoctrination & State Licensing because people who 'do' know things that politicians just want to argue idiotically-blindly about.

    The worst curse of our time is people who think 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) are the answer to every ill under the sun.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Roberta   10 months ago

    Some of those licenses are things the authorities don't want anyone to get. The shampooer assistant thing was made ridiculously expensive because the job is so unremunerative, it's really to require everyone in hairdressing to have a full cosmetology license, and not employ shampoo girls per se. Fortune telling they want to outlaw so they make the license unobtainable; same with naturopaths in some states, to enforce orthodoxy in health care.

    Log in to Reply
    1. jimc5499   10 months ago

      You have a point. In Pennsylvania, Barbers and Beauticians are required to be licensed. The State's main argument for it is to protect the health of their customers. As a result both receive instruction on how to provide their services to people with communicable diseases. Yet Barber Shops and Beauty Shops were among the first things to be shut down during COVID.
      One thing that hasn't been mentioned is CONTROL. A license can be revoked on a whim, with no recourse. Pennsylvania is famous for threatening people who have licenses, with their removal if they don't kow tow to the politician's commands.

      Log in to Reply
      1. charliehall   10 months ago

        Barbers and Beauticians are required to have training in infection control. That is actually quite important even when there isn't a pandemic.

        Log in to Reply
    2. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

      So "their" imagined intentions are what matter, not the gun in their hands?

      Log in to Reply
  8. Uncle Jay   10 months ago

    If there were no licensing fees, state and federal bureaucrats would have to get a real job, and who wants that on their conscience?

    Log in to Reply
    1. TJJ2000   10 months ago

      ^BINGO. So well stated +100000000000.
      The only humanitarian 'real job' of a monopoly of 'Guns' is to defend Individual Liberty and ensure Justice for all.

      Log in to Reply
    2. charliehall   10 months ago

      The reason for the licensing fees is to keep taxes low.

      Log in to Reply
  9. AT   10 months ago

    At least with a license you'll know she went to an accredited psychic school.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Chumby   10 months ago

      EnB will pen an article about licensing handjob artists.

      Log in to Reply
    2. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

      Ackshully, Altruist Totalitarians will believe in Good Faith that tuition was paid to the blessed schule.

      Log in to Reply
  10. LIBtranslator   10 months ago

    THAT's a half-octahedron house.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Sequel   10 months ago

    If you've ever seen what Amazon sells to allow people to repair broken teeth and dental work, you'll probably want to re-examine why dental hygienists are not allowed to operate independently ... and why dentists appear to need much higher licensing requirements.

    Private equity is turning some professions that used to thrive on great customer/patient relationships into a societal hazard zone.

    Log in to Reply
    1. charliehall   10 months ago

      Private Equity is actually destroying capitalism.

      One of the geniuses of the capitalist system was joint stock limited liability companies that anyone -- absolutely anyone -- could become a part owner in for a rather modest investment. It allowed the middle class and even the working class to share the profits of our profitable capitalist system. There were regulations, of course -- both from the government and from the stock exchanges. They were mostly about preventing fraud and punishing fraudsters. Even some libertarians think that fraud should be punished. Creative fraudsters like Donald Trump create complicated ownership structures to prevent anyone from understanding where their money goes and how it is earned. The Trump Organization is as opaque as a brick wall painted black and has been an Organized Criminal Enterprise for decades. It was convicted of 17 felonies and paid a small fine. Corporations are persons! This is why nobody on Wall Street will do business with Trump; they know that everything he says or writes is a lie.

      Private Equity restricts the opportunity to benefit from the best of capitalism to the already rich. And so do fraudsters. Regulations protect the public and the economy.

      Log in to Reply
  12. rxc   8 months ago

    These licenses are just like the guilds that existed for a very long time, but now the government controls them and the politicians benefit by handing out "nice good paying govt jobs with paid Healthcare and pensions" to their supporters - the unions of the govtv workers.

    Unions used to serve the guild function in private companies, until they would not let minorities join or work for those companies. They still do a lot of the same work, even now.

    The Democrats have a vision of a future where there is a wise, beautiful queen in charge, supported by her wise Latina advisors and men to do the icky stuff. There also be wise thinkers in universities to do research and communicate with the people. Beautiful objects will be crafted by skilled workers who belong to guilds, while the vast majority will be taught how to understand the direction from their betters, and how to obey their direction. The majority of the workers will know how to till the earth, sow and harvest crops, and maybe able to make basic agricultural tools. For this they will be rewarded with a steady supply of nourishing vegan gruell and a small communal fire, where they can rest, sing stiring songs, and complement one another about all the good work they are doing

    It will be utopia.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Britain Wants To Ban Teens From Social Media. The Evidence Suggests It Won't Work.

Reem Ibrahim | 6.15.2026 5:17 PM

Colorado Becomes Second State To Create Right to an Attorney When Police Seize Your Property

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.15.2026 2:16 PM

The White House vs. Anthropic's New AI Model

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.15.2026 11:55 AM

Trump's Lawyers Insist There Is 'No Evidence' of 'Collusion or Fraud' in His 'Settlement With Myself'

Jacob Sullum | 6.15.2026 10:50 AM

The Iran War Is Over, For Now

Matthew Petti | 6.15.2026 10:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks