Are California's New 'Woke' DEI College Standards Illegal?
Join Reason on YouTube at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about a lawsuit against California Community Colleges' new DEI standards with FIRE attorney Jessie Appleby and the plaintiff
California Community Colleges' new teaching standards "mandate viewpoint conformity" and "compel professors to teach and preach the State's perspective," according to a lawsuit called Palsgaard v. Christian, filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE.
Join Reason's Zach Weissmueller and Liz Wolfe this Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion with Jessie Appleby, an attorney with FIRE, and Bill Blanken, the plaintiff and a chemistry professor at Reedley College in California, who says the standards advanced by the state's community college board amount to "compelled speech" in the classroom.
They'll discuss the details of the case, dive into the proposed changes in the classroom, discuss the origins of the "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) standards that pervade academia and the corporate world, and examine FIRE's other case against Florida's Stop WOKE Act, which prohibits the kind of classroom instruction that California's new standards compel.
Watch the stream on Reason's YouTube channel.
Sources referenced in this conversation:
Palsgaard v. Christian complaint
California Community Colleges DEI curriculum model principles
Tema Okun: "Dismantling White Supremacy Culture"
The Intercept: "Tema Okun on Her Mythical Paper on White Supremacy"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why even have a state religion if officials are not required to promote it?
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Gosh, I WENT to Reedley College! I attended in early 80s. Decent community college, the way community colleges should be. Compared to the four years uni I transferred to, it was quite mainstream (what today people would call “conservative”). That it would be embroiled in such a controversy is shameful, and weird.
The town is still the same way. Slightly majority Latino, with large populations of Japanese and Ukrainian/German. Fruit is its major industry. It is NOT a woke place (that would be Fresno to the north). So weird that they devolved into viewpoint conformity. It is California, but it is NOT Blue California.
Okay, it's not Reedley College doing this. It's the State Community College Board. It's just a chem prof in Reedley who is fighting back. Good for him. Go Tigers!
“mandate viewpoint conformity”
If that doesn’t chill you to the bone, I don’t know what would.
I like how they're now saying the quiet part out loud.
To be fair, that's a quote from the lawsuit. Just as chilling if not more is this: "Professors must also employ a “social justice lens” and a “collectivism perspective,” rather than an “individualist perspective.” F'n Collectivists. It's the only way they can get away with any of the crap they're getting away with.
That's just common sense viewpoint control. You cannot have people out there thinking anything they want, they might just think wrong.
California tax payers pay the salaries, they get to tell the professors what to teach. Doesn’t chill me, even though I think California taxpayers are idiots.
Democrats should be illegal. Make it a capitol offense.
So should Republicans. A pox on both their houses.
>>a chemistry professor
elements are an affront? Bunsen was a misogynist racist?
elements are an affront?
Yes. How many elements are named after women* or non-Western countries or places? It's an outrage, I tells ya!
Do you recall that idiot Sandra Harding who suggested it would be honest to refer to Newton's Principia as a "rape manual".
*Curium and Meitnerium are the only two I can think of.
Bunsen was a misogynist racist?
I don't know about that, but he was sure callous with poor Beaker's feelings and safety over the years.
Beaker was awesome.
What does "illegal" mean in California these days?
Anything to do with asserting or protecting individual rights.
In this week's addition of who said that?
The individual is nothing, the state is everything.
The needs of the person must always be subservient to the needs of the people.
Hint: it wasn't Commander Spock.
So many blessings to Commie-Education and central planning. /s
Communism and Socialism is the BEST! /s
Maybe Individual Choice and Free-Markets wouldn't bring about government indoctrination in the first place. Just a thought.
Government-enforced indoctrination is immoral and wrong, whether from the left (Newsom) or the right (DeFascist).
There was a (short-lived) movement to call it JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion), but I guess that triggered some people who happened to be evil.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
Sometimes you can’t make this stuff up. And this was in what was once a proud scientific journal for the mainstream:
The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although they’re ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution (violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of “Jedi mind tricks,” etc.).
Star Wars has a problematic cultural legacy. The space opera franchise has been critiqued for trafficking in injustices such as sexism, racism and ableism. Think, for example, of the so-called “Slave Leia” costume,
I am, I am....
Holy shit, that whole article is one giant clusterfuck of irony.
They bitch about Jedi being (white) saviors, and about eugenics and exclusion because of how Jedi are born with the Force, yet say that's bad for DEI, which is entirely based on skin color, sex, etc... basically, how you were born.
Unscientific American has been a joke for a long time, but this is a new low. Like Teen Reason, except with a pseudoacademic vocabulary.
If your words have enough syllables you're smart no matter what you say! -Modern academic journals
I am producing 88 US dollars per-day to complete a few l services on the laptop.. I certainly did not believe that it'd be achievable , however one of my best pals collected 25,000 US dollars in five weeks by doing this job & she convinced me to join…
Explore extra updates by reaching this article >>> https://jobclub01.blogspot.com/
It's great to hear that you're making $88 per day by providing laptop services, and it's even more impressive that your friend earned $25,000 in just five weeks doing the same job. It's always inspiring to see people finding success in their chosen endeavors. If you have any questions or would like advice on how to further improve or expand your laptop services, please feel free to ask. Your success story may also motivate others to explore similar opportunities.
Regard:
https://bizpostnews.com/
As a white, male instructor in Bill’s district who is currently going through the tenure process, I can say that Bill is arguing with a dystopian strawman and does not reflect the process or district culture that I’ve experienced over the past 10 years. I doubt Reason cares about perspectives that differ from Bill and FIRE’s narrative, but so many questions were raised in this stream that were left unanswered. For instance, when asked why DEI is being used, Jessie (who isn’t an academic or administrator) had no answer. The answer is that, unlike the student-deficit model that has historically been used (and places all blame on students for not succeeding), equity-minded pedagogy involves research-based strategies that hold instructors and institutions accountable for student success. We use it because it works. Sure it’s a little extra work to make sure students feel welcomed, but if Bill actually thinks science is the pursuit of truth, then surely research-based pedagogy would interest him. But judging from public statements by former students, he simply doesn’t care to help ensure student success. He comes across, professionally, as disengaged and lazy. And the notion that we can't say the names of WHITE scientists in the classroom is pure fantasy. Bill is lying to you.