Can Governments Increase Birthrates? Should They?
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the limits of population control with Elizabeth Nolan Brown and Scott Winship.
"On the left and the right, in Europe and the United States, a consensus is growing: People aren't having enough kids," Reason Senior Editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown wrote in Reason's June cover story, "Storks Don't Take Orders From the State."
However, Brown cautions against pro-natalist government policies: "They're incredibly expensive, they produce few or no gains in fertility, and they can lead to a disturbingly authoritarian form of governance where individual choices about family formation are deprioritized and women are pressured to have babies for the national good."
Join Reason's Nick Gillespie Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for an unscripted conversation about whether governments can—or should—try to increase falling birthrates. He'll be joined by Nolan Brown and Scott Winship, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and director of its Center on Opportunity and Social Mobility, who has written widely on myths and realities about economic and cultural decline.
- Producer: Bess Byers
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So this means bureaucrats/cops will no longer get charged with rape as long as it results in pregnancy?
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here———————————————->>> http://Www.Coins71.Com
If it turns out that the rape accusation is false (and this happens more often than you think), then yes. As does with every citizen.
Learn to be responsible.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart ......
SITE. ——>>> bitecoin.com
Excellent documentary on global declining birthrates. Non-political and discusses the very topic of states being able to increase birthrates-- acknowledging that policies rarely, if ever work.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Can't increase birth rates but you can drop the population by 50 to 60 million using lower birth rates, by deporting all illegals currently in America and using AI and technology to replace them within ten years. Increased Productivity, more wages for fewer hours, and our standard of living would go back to being the envy of the world.
The problem is that AI can only replace white collar jobs. The actual useful jobs that require hands and thumbs - those AI is not yet ready to replace.
Ideally, we would remove the white collar workers, and keep the manual laborers.
Repetitive manual jobs can be replaced with robotics like welding or tire changing.
https://www.foxnews.com/auto/ai-powered-robotire-change-tires-twice-fast-human
Can Governments Increase Birthrates?
Ignoring the border?
Can Governments Increase Birthrates? Should They? Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the limits of population control with Elizabeth Nolan Brown and Scott Winship.
What if you held a discussion on lower population and nobody came? 🙂
And what if you held a discussion on increasing population and everybody came (in one way or another?) 😉
Can the government increase birth rates?
Sure. Give me $100k, me and the husband will go get a surrogate and have some kids. The bill is the main thing holding us back.
Oh, wait, the people concerned about birth rates don't want people like us (that is, middle-class college-educated gay men, one of which is Hispanic) to have kids.
Need help carrying that cross there?
Well, he sure as hell doesn't need help carrying a HS biology textbook or even a teen pregnancy pamphlet.
You WILL reproduce!!!
Sincerely, your Pro-Life tyrants.
Governments have decreased birth rates, through government handouts, social programs, retirement programs, taxes, and many other policies. They shouldn't actively "increase birthrates", they should simply stop actively decreasing birthrates.
Well China sure shows governments can decrease birth rates.
Can Governments Increase Birthrates?
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM