Black Americans vs. Progressivism: Jason L. Riley Debates Nikhil Pal Singh at the Soho Forum
The Manhattan Institute senior fellow and the NYU historian debate whether black Americans should move away from progressivism.
HD DownloadOn March 30, the Manhattan Institute's Jason L. Riley and New York University (NYU) professor Nikhil Pal Singh will debate the resolution, "Upward mobility for black Americans lies in rejecting the policies of progressive government, while making the most of the opportunities offered by American society." The debate will be held at New York City's Sheen Center and hosted by The Soho Forum, which receives fiscal sponsorship from Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes Reason.
Taking the affirmative is Riley, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, where he has written about politics, economics, education, immigration, and social inequality for more than 25 years. He's also a frequent public speaker and provides commentary for television and radio news outlets. Riley is the author of five books, including Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed, False Black Power?, Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell, and The Black Boom.
Arguing for the negative is Singh, professor of social and cultural analysis and history at NYU and the founding faculty director of the university's Prison Education Program. He is author, most recently, of Race and America's Long War, and of the forthcoming Reconstructing Democracy: Black Intellectuals in the American Century. His essays have appeared in The New Republic, The Nation, The New Statesman, n+1, and Boston Review. His November 2018 Soho Forum debate on "anti-racism," opposite John McWhorter, has received more than a quarter-million YouTube views.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Skin color is the most important thing.
Yes.
I am making ????150 every hour by working on the web at home. A month ago I have gotten $19723 from this activity. This activity is exceptionally astounding and its normal income for me is superior to anything my past office work. This activity is for all and everyone can without much of a stretch join this correct now by utilize this link.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://salarycash710.blogspot.com
Looks to be an interesting debate.
Shut up you miserable commie creep.
Would you prefer exile to some shithole, or do you plan to commit suicide?
It's not a legitimate debate question. It calls for two different questions. One of which is just stupid and not a real question. Make the most of the opportunities offered by American society? Who's debating 'no' as the option?
“Your white supremacy is showing”.
That’s who.
Unless some law students show up and squeeze the juice.
"The debate will be held at New York City's Sheen Center," which describes itself as a "Catholic-affiliated performing arts complex with 2 theaters, rehearsal studios & an art gallery."
Thank God it's not going to be at a censorious and intolerant place like a university! He'd be called an Uncle Tom right out of the box.
You’ve all probably heard by now that the democrats have indicted Trump. So now it’s time for the democrats to go. For real.
My odds are Reason somewhat downplays the charges, defends the other prosecutions, still calls trump terrible and a bad person, but doesn't forcefully condemn it.
Jason Riley is obviously suffering from false consciousness. Either that, or he is the black face of white supremacy.
I thought Larry Elder had already been crowned that. Or is this not a Highlander situation?
Fuck no black people shouldn't move away from progressivism. Do you have any idea of how many of them there would be without abortion? Keep them addicted to that shit!
/sarkkk
As usual they have politically white guy arguing against an authentic black guy
If they don't like slavery they obviously should.
Nothing is more baffling than historical slaves voting for the slavery party.
this information really provides commentary for television and radio news outlets also check https://naijaring.com/sa-9ja
"Riley is the author of five books, including Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed, False Black Power?, Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell, and The Black Boom."
More on my reading list. Going to be a busy Summer.
The question should not be “what to call” black people, but why the question continues to be asked. I do not naturally think of my friends, relations and neighbors in terms of skin color. In my own thoughts and conversations I do not automatically think of them as “my black friend” or “my gay friend” or “my male friends” or “my female friends.” They are simply my friends. As a child growing up mostly on Air Force bases, I was not even aware that race was a thing. The casual racist comments of my cousins back on the farm prompted me to ask my dad about it. The only time skin color becomes relevant is when others make it so. If others discriminate against people because of gender or orientation or skin color, then the question is “what to do about it?” Can we end such bad behavior or at least discourage it? Should there be laws and punishments? Will that work or is it just virtue signaling? Is gathering data on skin color useful for public policy, or does it just continue the focus on something that maybe should be ignored more? Just my thoughts for the day.
I do not naturally think of my friends, relations and neighbors in terms of skin color. In my own thoughts and conversations I do not automatically think of them as “my black friend” or “my gay friend” or “my male friends” or “my female friends.” They are simply my friends.
Check out Hitler over here.
I don't understand.
You’re kidding, right? The Critical Theories academics openly declare that NOT treating people differently based on their skin color is literally racist.
Excellent description; reminds me of studying abnormal psychology. We are dealing with crazy on a macro level
Morgan Freeman was right. Stop talking about it.
In a discussion on a different website, I stated my opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, to the extent it banned private discrimination. Someone replied: "You won't find a lot of black libertarians." I replied: "Their loss. Freedom is good for everyone. Conversely, statism is bad for everyone, and no amount of government handouts or government-sponsored discrimination in your favor will change that."
+1000 right; Democrats *entitle-me* (Subsidizing) Rights Act?
Over-writing the point of the 1868 Civil Rights Act.
Democrats do that a lot. Republicans say, "Play fair." and Democrats turn it into, "Entitle me!".