Florida Parents Take Back the Classroom
But parental rights laws and anti–critical race theory bills can’t end the curriculum wars. Only school choice can.
HD Download"It is a fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their minor children." That's the opening line of Florida's Parents' Bill of Rights, signed into law in June 2021. Similar bills have been proposed in Missouri, Kentucky, Texas, and even at the federal level.
"Our children do not belong to the government," says Patti Sullivan, state coordinator for Parental Rights Florida, which has pushed for legislation of this sort since 2013.
"We do not co-parent with the government. And these entities seem to think that they are entitled to our children, and they are not," says Sullivan.
State bans on the teaching of critical race theory (CRT), which have swept the nation, are a more aggressive attempt to limit the discretion that teachers and administrators have over what's taught in school. They've been especially popular with voters.
Republican Glenn Youngkin ousted the heavily favored Terry McAuliffe in the Virginia governor's race after he campaigned against CRT in schools, and on his first day in office, he banned it from classrooms via executive order. Four other states have also banned CRT, and several more are considering similar bills.
However, opponents of CRT bans and more modest bills to force schools to post their curricula online say that "curriculum transparency bills are just thinly veiled attempts at chilling teachers and students from learning and talking about race and gender in schools," as the American Civil Liberties Union recently tweeted.
Parents have never had the "right to shape their kids' school curriculum," authors of a recent Washington Post op-ed argued. If that's what parents want, it says, they should opt out and "send their children to private or religious schools."
But why should families who can afford private school be the only ones who have a say in how their children are taught?
"I'm pretty skeptical of the government deciding what should be taught in any type of school," says Corey DeAngelis, national director of research for the American Federation for Children and a senior fellow at Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this website). He says public school parents should also have the right to choose the most fitting academic setting for their kids. The solution is to "fund students, not systems," giving families the choice to spend education dollars on the schooling of their choosing instead of the one-size-fits-all approach offered by traditional public schools.
"[CRT] bills are just a form of whack-a-mole, where your CRT battles of today were the common core battles of yesterday, and it'll be something else going forward because the reality is parents disagree about what kind of education they want their kids to have…And the better solution is the bottom-up accountability in allowing families to vote with their feet," says DeAngelis.
This has become such a hot-button issue because the pandemic gave parents direct exposure to exactly what their children were and weren't being taught.
"Parents are awake now that they have seen the curriculum," says Tina Descovich, a former Brevard County, Florida, school board member and co-founder of Moms for Liberty. "They now understand school district policies, which they had never looked at before. They are understanding the structure, who holds authority, and what types of authority, within the education system. I think that's vital, and it's something that's been lacking for a long time."
In contrast to CRT bans, the Florida Parents' Bill of Rights broadly affirms that parents have a right to know what schools are teaching and providing to their children.
One of the most controversial aspects of the bill is how it applies to medical and mental health services. It establishes that any medical services provided without parental consent can result in misdemeanor charges.
Sullivan says some parents are particularly concerned that schools are counseling their kids on their sexuality and gender identity without parental consent. The parents of one student in a Tallahassee public school sued after the staff held a meeting without their knowledge to discuss accommodating their 13-year-old's shift to a nonbinary gender identity. They also noted in a file that the student's "privacy when [staff are] speaking to parents" must be considered.
"School districts are not medical facilities. That's a complicated issue. And there should be no reason why parents should not be aware of what's going on with their children in any way, shape, or form," says Sullivan.
It is a complicated issue. Where do the rights of parents end and the privacy rights of teenagers who want to confide in a trusted teacher or counselor begin? It was a topic hotly debated on the floor of the Florida Legislature during the passage of the bill, as representatives echoed the concerns of LGBT constituents who worry that the Parents' Bill of Rights will force staff to disclose the sexuality of gay students who aren't ready to come out to their parents.
There's some dispute over whether the law does indeed require that, with LGBT group Equality Florida issuing a statement that "the bill does nothing to change current law related to disclosure of a student's sexual orientation or gender identity," while Sullivan says that it does.
"The law states that they must share all information with the parent," says Sullivan. "I think that it's very important that we maintain the fact that these parents are entrusting their children to these [government] entities, and they are not qualified or equipped to make those decisions [regarding sexuality and gender]."
DeAngelis maintains that the clash of values is best addressed through increased school choice.
"We force families into a one-size-fits-all, government-run school system, and these bills try to prohibit or encourage certain types of policies in that one-size-fits-all system," says DeAngelis. "The only way to move forward with freedom rather than force is to allow the money to follow the child to wherever they want to get an education that aligns best with their parents' values."
The pandemic-related school closures have bolstered the school choice movement, with 22 states expanding, improving, or implementing new school choice programs in 2021.
Florida is already far ahead of most states in providing parents with school choice, but DeAngelis says it should go further by offering universal vouchers and education savings accounts, which would truly empower parents and children to opt for any school of their choosing.
"What better way to assert parental rights are important than to empower them directly by allowing the money to follow their child to wherever they get an education? Funding students directly truly empowers parents when it comes to their kid's education. That is the best way to assert those rights," says DeAngelis.
Produced by Zach Weissmueller; additional camera by Isaac Reese; graphics by Nodehaus
Photo credits: Karla Ann Cote/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Karla Ann Cote/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Max Herman/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Kostas Lymperopoulos/Cal Sport Media/Newscom; Ken Cedeno/UPI/Newscom; Annette Holloway/Icon Sportswire DMJ/Annette Holloway/Icon Sportswire/Newscom; Photo by fauxels from Pexels; Video by RODNAE Productions from Pexels; Dirk Shadd/ZUMA Press/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Florida
ParentsInsurrectionistsTake Back the ClassroomPlot Terrorist Attacks Against School OfficialsFixed.
-- DoJ
Apparently, the DoJ isn't all that tech-savvy.
You are correct, and I don't understand Biden supporting Reason deviating from the Biden Administration radical leftist talking points and correct inciting words.
Is Reason suddenly waking up? I doubt it, I will have to see it to believe it. They just have to much Trump hate to admit the truth, Biden is the worst US President ever.
""curriculum transparency bills are just thinly veiled attempts at chilling teachers and students from learning and talking about race and gender in schools," as the American Civil Liberties Union recently tweeted."
So prestigious ACLU has no go-to eccept Victimology?
I guess they missed who OWN the system!
Not the commies in the teachers unions!
They prefer to keep the curriculum thickly veiled.
Yes, such as the Red Herrings of " vouchers" and " gay rights"
Vouchers solve nothing bc with money comes control.
This is what the education establishment has done to young people.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/01/survey-young-people-embrace-cancel-culture-to-advance-social-justice-even-when-they-are-the-victims/
Survey: Young People Embrace Cancel Culture To Advance Social Justice Even When They Are The Victims
According to the report, “by a 48–27 margin, respondents under 30 agree that ‘My fear of losing my job or reputation due to something I said or posted online is a justified price to pay to protect historically disadvantaged groups.'”
We need to get democrats out of education.
Wood Chippers. Diesel, not solar powered.
Much higher throughput.
Solar powered wood chipper?
Rimshot!
School choice doesn't fix the basic issue -- which is that we, as a society, need to teach TRUTH to our kids, no matter what school they are in. Sending your kid to a truth-telling school while your neighbor sends her kids to a CRT-teaching school is just a recipe for conflict and disaster.
CRT needs to be outlawed everywhere. Choice doesn't help that.
George Carlin, who saw all this coming decades ago, must be turning in his grave. CRT is what 1,000 pages and all of it can be constitutionally banned? Absurd. You can only legislate curricula if you have a Country with 'borders language, culture, E. Pluribus Unum and assimilation' taking place. That horse has left the barn so choice is the best option for now.
And what do you teach when adults can't agree on what the TRUTH is?
teach facts. not agreenent.
Law, science, religion, finance.
Very simple
Not simple at all if you intend to teach something like history. Where often facts are few, blurred by time and bias, and have been debated since the shit happened. And where making value judgements for a lot of people is one the many purposes of history.
Also, progs can just teach “facts” with a heavy bias by omission. Such as only centering on the bad shit that happened because of colonization, etc. These things happened. But they weren’t the only things that happened.
On that level, the source of the problem is the over abundance of left wing bias in every educational institution from pre-K to university.
As for CRT, I think the only real way to combat the APPLICATION of critical theories (because that’s the actual problem) is for parents and teachers to understand what they are and how they’re being used. (My wife’s a teacher and she hates this shit, and thinks a lot of teachers do they’re just kept quiet by the administration).
It comes with discerning the difference between a history class talking about how sucky colonization could be, and the process of “decolonization”. Where teachers and students start applying Critical theory to the language, the themes, and the structure of the material in order to peel away the “racist” structure of the history itself, so that they can achieve commie “liberation” by deconstructing every narrative. It’s essentially anti-history.
Know the difference, and CRT and other critical theories are indefensible in grade schools any of us are forced to pay for.
Private schools aren’t a silver bullet, because they’re mostly paid for by rich liberals. They’re potentially worse.
The bleating of liberals and the media that "Critical Race Theory" isn't taught in public schools is correct, as far as it goes. As a law-school philosophy (which is where it apparently originated) it may have validity. I don't know, and I'm not going to waste the time to find out.
However, what is being taught in public schools is the usual dumbed-down New-Math version of CRT, which, boiled to its essence, consists of "All whites are evil racist oppressors and all blacks are virtuous victims," which is not only untrue but extremely dangerous.
Don't ban CRT by name, because clever school administrators will figure out a way to eel around a ban. Simply ban any teaching of "Whites are evil because of their race and blacks are virtuous because of their race." Then go from there.
It is my opinion that race relations were improving -- slowly, but improving -- until Obama was elected. Trump didn't help, but Biden accelerated the slide.
At my wife’s previous school they just had “CRT” stand for something else. Cultural response training or something. And like you said, it was more of milquetoast “diversity” kind of thing.
But when she got the memos about white teachers were problematic for students of color, then she had to bail from that county.
I agree. CRT is pure b.s. Totally made up drivel by someone with a phony PHD.
No different than the 1619 project....another piece of trash that needs to be tossed into a dumpster.
However, opponents of CRT bans and more modest bills to force schools to post their curricula online say that "curriculum transparency bills are just thinly veiled attempts at chilling teachers and students from learning and talking about race and gender in schools,"
They're not 'thinly veiled'.
They're not veiled at all. They are open orders to public servants that they have no place indoctrinating children with bizarre marxist and perverse race and gender ideologies.
And if they can't stop, well then there will be consequences.
CANT make it up...
https://apnews.com/article/oddities-bette-midler-west-virginia-governor-jim-justice-dog-f791d896f56707884d1ad7effbe99ffa
When discussing CRT it is helpful to imagine replacing the term with Mein Kampf.
Teaching Mein Kampf has no place in US public education, just like teaching CRT.
Teaching about both, the evils of both, and their shared roots, is perfectly appropriate for high school students.
Most laws being proposed have good intentions behind them but are poorly written with many being so vague or subjective no Court is going to be able to uphold, let alone enforce them. School choice and vouchers and a rigorous counter attack against public school boards to get adults elected to them is the best way forward.
Bullshit. Nearly all of them are clearly intended to go way past the line of the legitimately offensive crap. IIRC one or two of the very first ones to pass was reasonable, but that was before it became an excuse to start rewriting history and the status of race relations.
It's indoctrination and radicalization 101... start with a legitimate issue you can get broad agreement on, slowly expand what falls under that issue on the margins while continuing to hammer the core to retain support. It's how we wound up with the anti-racism and white fragility bullshit to begin with.
So, what you saying is: The opponents of CRT have stolen a page from the proponents of CRT.
Yeah, maybe the proponents of CRT should have thought this through before they tried to weaponize public education for their own ends. But, being the Marxist douchebags and useful idiots they are we all know that wasn't in the cards.
So, fuck off slaver.
The war isn’t over curriculum it’s over lying to our children.
By advocating school choice as the panacea, you’re ignoring the problem.
I mean unless you’re advocating that we should have the choice to choose schools BASED on the lies they indoctrinate our children with. Preparing them to be “good little bigots” like you, taking our civilization further down into the rabbit hole.
Is that the curriculum war you’re advocating?
So you want history to be taken off the curriculum altogether? But how are you gonna spread your revisionist drivel then?
History is simply past reality, truth. It is not a lie.
Lies, also in history books, should be criminalized.
I have soundly refuted the lie called the holocaust and demonstrated that you too are a holocaust denier.
I you care to deny either I can easily present the evidence, once again, to prove it.
So Tacitus and Herodotus only spoke the truth?
That depends If what they wrote is supported by both logic and science and cannot be refuted by either, then it represents the best perception of truth humanity is currently capable of.
Would you consider David Irving to be a representative of the truth?
My criteria for truth doesn’t change.
Do you even value truth?
You dodged the question.
It seems to me that you can’t refute what I say, so you want to make it about what others say.
You replied to me
“ I have soundly refuted the lie called the holocaust and demonstrated that you too are a holocaust denier. I you care to deny either I can easily present the evidence, once again, to prove it.”
Do you deny it or not? You’re dodging the question.
I neither replied to nor engaged with that previous part of your conversation. I’m concerned about your concept of truth. And it’s simplicity.
I just want to know if you find David Irving to be representative of the truth.
After you claimed history is simply the truth. And after you claimed that the truth is whatever is supported by and not refuted by science and logic.
I ask this because you have previous linked to things that ultimately source Irving as proof of your grasp of science and logic.
If you claim to be wielding science and logic, it’s either your own work in the field, or you’re (at least somewhat) basing it on what others say. Right?
It is clear that on January 29 at 8:39 am you did reply to exactly that comment and question of mine.
Don’t lie and quit dodging the question.
Depending on your answer I will provide the evidence of proof as promised.
Then you’ll have all the opportunity you need to refute what I say, not what someone else says which isn’t my argument to defend.
Im not interested in your “evidence”. I’ve been through this before with you. I find none of it convincing. Your
“Science” is cherry picked from sources that have already walked back their assertions and/or have been demolished by people who actually work in the field. And your “logic” amounts to: “if it wasn’t 6 million there wasn’t a nazi genocide of Jews”. And you seem to view the Jewish genocide in a contextual bubble in regards to everything else the nazis did.
The evidence I and countless people have provided you with is the entirety of scholarly work on the subject. The mass of clerical, physical, and eye witness evidence that is readily available just about anywhere. As well as the millions of people shipped East who magically disappeared in German custody you must account for. But you do the typical online denier thing and reply “prove the Holocaust in 250 words or less”.
Im trying to get past that bullshit. What I am vaguely interested (for personal research reasons) in your notion that history is truth, Simple and obvious.
So let’s try this a different way. Do you think historical method is important?
Neither you nor anyone else has ever refuted anything that I’ve said here including the evidence that I’ve provided that soundly refutes the bullshit holocaust lie.
You obviously still aren’t able to.
Still you claim what you can’t prove and deny what you can’t refute.
I couldn’t care less what interests bigots like you.
I correctly point out that there is zero physical evidence of a holocaust, that testimony is inadmissible as paid or coerced, that evidence that refutes it is illegal in every nation where it allegedly occurred even so there are mountains of irrefutable evidence that refute it and the people who have gained the most from the story have a history of falsely claiming holocausts and worship lying in their religion.
It begs the question, by what faulty logic can anyone believe that there was a holocaust?
I'm all for school choice but let's not pretend setting up schools that distort history and teach bullshit according to rightwing precepts, and another set that do so according to left wing precepts, is going to solve the curriculum wars. It's just going to ensure even fewer kids get a rational, reasonable, historically accurate education.
Allowing kids in earlier grades to do research papers where their own conclusions, supported by documented facts, are valid would be a good start.
Ron Misek at 14 should be just as entitled to his conclusions with documented facts as I am in crediting Fibonacci with the rise of the merchant class in Europe.
Such things are not allowed in schools and haven’t been for decades. All original thoughts must be sourced, meaning kids are not allowed to think critically, but must regurgitate someone else’s opinion.
I support school choice. But this cannot be sold as panache on issues like CRT every single time.
Many licensed teachers activist types and will try to indoctrinate your children in any school. Whatever entity that approves teaching licenses and school accreditations are also likely activist. The textbooks and education materials are written by activists. Even if a true breakthrough system exists, states like CA can pass laws to force them to teach curriculum of their choice, mandate masks, etc.
Public schools aren't monopolies in a sense Amazon is a monopoly. I don't have to buy anything Amazon. If I have a kid I HAVE to send him or her to school, and government ran schools (including charters) are almost certainly my only options if I have no money for private schools. And my kid can't wait 4,5 years until some innovator builds a great school.
If we lived in a racist society, our option to just abide by "non racist" alternatives in a free market? No, you have to take on the system eventually, Theoretically someone could have built great "black only" schools in the Jim Crow era. We weren't going to tolerate that. When public schools that run on our tax money treats parents and students like lepers, you have to act.
[Theoretically someone could have built great "black only" schools in the Jim Crow era.]
Actually, there were some great Black schools back then. See the Dunbar School. We also had one in the town where I live.
There are some great Black schools now. Not a problem, as far as I can see.
Of course parents should have a voice in their children's education. But I also think that it is whoever pays the fiddler that gets to call the tune. Meaning the taxpayer is the ultimate arbiter in these matters.
So if the majority of taxpayers agree they want Marxist indoctrination taught in public schools then so be it.
But, it also needs to be honest and upfront. Where people clearly know the choices they are making. Which the proponents of CRT have never been. At least as it concerns what they are presenting in K-12 public schooling.
No, all the dissembling, misdirection and gaslighting is an admission that they know they would lose in the court of public opinion,
Isn't it amazing how fast activist courts will step in to prevent ballot initiatives or referendum over purported "ambiguity" whenever it is the left's ox being gored? Yet when the electoral shoe is on the other foot nobody (certainly not the brave truth telling "libertarians" of Reason) seems to notice any problems.
You’ll sell anything for a few shekels.
You’d sell your inalienable rights if you could.
Something is broken in you.
Here, let us affix our sucker-faces to the fascist culture war being waged in primary schools on behalf of the Koch brother and associated psychopathic billionaires. Let's drop the culture war crack-cocaine onto the table here and quickly shuffle away, passing out pamphlets for "school choice," newspeak for "taxpayer-funded private schools with lower standards (the better for our oligarch sugar daddies to pocket the profits)."
As for the Branch Trumpivians lurching from left to right looking for the final excuse to mass-murder trans people and black people, I dunno, imprison them all? Assassinate the Murdoch family? I'm struggling to think of the utilitarian excess that would overtake the problem in terms of human harm.
LMFAO all the lefty shits on this website are degraded to psychotic rants lately. Even the highly civilized, no-bullshit authoritarian disgrace Joe Friedbrain seems pretty angry and frustrated. Having a rough time, guys? 😀
phosphoramidite chemistry
https://rna.bocsci.com/products-services/common-rna-synthesis.html
RNA Phosphoramidites
My problem with school choice is that I don't want my tax money going to religious schools. While public schools may do liberal indoctrination, parochial schools do want to turn out good Catholics.
Your tax money shouldn't go to any school. Your tax money should attach to your kids, and go the school where you send them. That's the point of choice.
If, by some wildly inexplicable twist of fate, Catholic schools happen to do schoolin' better than the other schools, and parents all want to send their kids to Catholic schools, well, power to them.
If bureaucrats decide where the money goes, then there is no "choice". When parents decide, and tax money follows those decisions, then there is true school choice.
Your tax money shouldn't go to any school. Your tax money should attach to your kids, and go the school where you send them. That's the point of choice.
Great. I don't have kids. I can opt out of paying taxes that would go toward the education of other people's kids, then? It basically works that way in Florida, to a small extent. People love coming down here to retire from the midwest and northeast U.S. (Especially those that have the retirement savings to be "snowbirds" that come down here in the winter and go back up north when it gets super hot for 5 months straight.) They love the lack of income taxes and generally low taxes otherwise. Why should they care about public education here? Their grandkids are going to school in other states.
Anyone that will pay enough in taxes toward public schools over their adult lives to roughly match the benefits of that funding for their own children probably had only one or two kids and is middle class. And schools in middle class neighborhoods aren't the ones that are held up as examples of "failing" public schools. Most of those seem to do a decent job. Some private schools can do better, but usually those are the ones that charge considerably more tuition than is spent toward public schools. The private schools in my metro area in Florida that are considered "good" schools, with high acceptance rates to 4-year universities, and so on, charge about double in tuition what Florida spends on public schools and for our voucher programs. You think the poor, minority students getting vouchers here are going to those schools? (Oh, and before you say it, all but one of the top private schools here are religious, including a couple Catholic schools. Not all Catholic schools are bargains.)
"It is a fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their minor children."
This statement isn't at all controversial. It is just as plainly correct as it is to say that it is a fundamental right of individuals to speak their minds, follow whatever religious beliefs they choose (including none), and so on.
But why should families who can afford private school be the only ones who have a say in how their children are taught?
This, however, is where the author and other school choice advocates misunderstand the issue. Those families that can't afford private school still have a say in how their children are taught. They can vote for school board members that agree with their point of view, or state legislators and governors that will write and sign laws that reflect their point of view, appoint people to state boards of education that they agree with, and so on. They can also speak publicly to their concerns, and speak directly with teachers and administrators about the topics of their child's education.
What they don't have is a right to completely individualize everything that their children are taught using public funds. This should also be completely uncontroversial. No one has an inherent and individual right to decide how their tax money is spent, let alone the money paid to government by other taxpayers. Publicly funded education exists because it is seen by the overwhelming majority of people as a necessary public good. That means that deciding how the revenue generated for that purpose is spent is going to be a government function through elected officials. That is just like everything that government does because it is viewed by voters as a public good.
Parents can't have it both ways. It is contradictory to insist on having a right to public funds and yet also be able to spend it entirely as you choose, with no say from the public providing those funds.
Bringing up Florida's school choice record is particularly problematic on this. Florida's newspapers, particularly the Orlando Sentinel, have documented the almost complete lack of accountability in the voucher program and the problems this lack of accountability creates. Private schools that forge safety inspection reports, hire people with criminal records, mismanage funds, and even schools that are so poorly run that they end up closing in the middle of a school year with almost no notice to parents are examples of what happens. Not to mention that some of these private "schools" are really just babysitting students as they work through canned curriculum designed for homeschooling, rather than having knowledgeable teachers guiding them through real, interactive learning. And then there is also the question of what they are being taught and whether these schools are accepting public funds while discriminating against students and parents. It is also well documented that many of the religious private schools that are part of the voucher system teach creationism or refuse to admit LGBT students or even straight students that have LGBT parents.
I am not against the idea of school choice. Charter schools can be very innovative and good for students. But the original vision of what charter schools were to be would have had them sharing those innovations openly so that all educators could learn from their experiences. Charters that see themselves as competing for students aren't likely to do that, as they would be sharing "trade secrets". (Especially for the for-profit charter management companies that get around the laws requiring charters to be non-profit.) And vouchers for private schools could be done well if they included a reasonable degree of accountability and requirements not to discriminate against students on a basis that a public school could not.
But the libertarians and conservatives that push the hardest for school choice don't seem to want any of that. They just seem to want parents that don't agree with the "leftist indoctrination" in regular public schools to be able to use taxpayer funds to indoctrinate their children into their beliefs instead.
Now do health care.
All we libertarians want is to be able to choose, and for the tax dollars associated with our choice to go to the provider we choose.
It's that simple. If my local public school sucks, and there is a school across town willing to take my child, then I want the tax dollars allocated for my child to move from the school that sucks to the one across town.
How can this possibly be controversial-- unless you think your judgement, for someone else's child, is better than that of the parent?
Now do health care.
No problem. You are free to choose a provider that you want. However, we, as taxpayers, reserve the right to limit payment to providers that are licensed, meet basic standards of care, provide treatments recognized by the larger medical community as being safe and effective, and to limit the ability of those providers to charge more than what the public system will pay. If a provider wants to use treatments that are so unorthodox as to not be recognized by professional organizations of medical providers as being safe, effective, and based on valid research, then they don't have to participate in the program. Patients can then pay out of their own pocket for acupuncture, cryotherapy, homeopathy, and whatever other 'alternative' medicine* they want.
*If you've never heard it, Tim Michin's comedy poem "Storm" has the perfect take on this. "Alternative medicine, by definition, has not been proven to work, or has been proven not to work. Do you know what they call "alternative medicine" that has been proven to work? Medicine."
How can this possibly be controversial-- unless you think your judgement, for someone else's child, is better than that of the parent?
It isn't my judgement alone that might be better than a parent's. It is the considered judgement of legislators and boards of education responsive to voters and that will take the time to evaluate facts and testimony from experts in various educational fields about what minimum standards a 'good' school should be meeting. Just like it is the judgement of similar groups of people about what health care providers meet minimum standards before taxpayer money flows to them.
Just look into the facts uncovered by reporting in Florida about some of the voucher schools that received tax money that I was talking about. Parents certainly have the incentive to make good choices for their children, but that doesn't mean that they all will. There is nothing at all unreasonable about wanting accountability for how tax money is spent beyond just assuming that the parents are going to do it well.
So with Florida parents taking back the classroom, I take it that Nazi propaganda will once again fill Florida schools.
Instead of leftist/marxist ideology and grooming.
This is a movement that will sweep across the country. Thanks to the people who voted to boot out the Marxists in Virginia and special thanks to Florida Gov. DeSantis, who are leading the fight against these Marxist school boards intent of brainwashing and indoctrinating young children which only amounts to grooming, for unsavory purposes; the parents and the governors of these and other states are serving up a warning to the bloated teacher's unions and Marxist school boards their ideology will not be tolerated and allowed to be spread like a disease.
Gov. DeSantis shows great courage in standing up to the bullies in the public education sector as well as against a rotted out corpse known as Disney. If I were him, I would tell Disney to take a hike. Disney needs to go.