Garry Kasparov: From Communism's Last Chess Champion to Freedom Fighter
30 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, its greatest—and last—chess champion reflects on the awful system that produced him.
HD DownloadThe Soviet Union collapsed 30 years ago in part because its government-run economy was incapable of producing the blue jeans, cigarettes, and automobiles that its citizens wanted.
What it was great at was producing champion chess players.
From the end of World War II until the Evil Empire dissolved in 1991, all but one world champion—the American Bobby Fischer—represented the USSR.
None was better than Garry Kasparov, who became world champion in 1985 at the record-setting age of 22. Widely considered the greatest chess player in modern history, he held that title for 15 years.
As a chess prodigy, he traveled abroad for competitions and describes youthful trips to France and Germany as nothing short of revelatory. The casual "abundance" of what used to be called "the free world" "just felt different," he says. Beyond the Iron Curtain, he encountered the anti-communist works of George Orwell and was able to read exiled dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's suppressed indictments of totalitarianism.
As the '80s progressed, he publicly questioned the Soviet system. In 1990, he joined the Democratic Party of Russia and became increasingly outspoken in favor of human rights, representative democracy, and limited government.
In post-Soviet Russia, he used his celebrity and influence to spearhead attempts to build civil society and conduct fair elections, emerging as a critic of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. By the early 2010s, he had been arrested for participating in unauthorized anti-government demonstrations and was widely believed to be the author of a popular petition demanding Putin's resignation.
As chairman of the Human Rights Foundation, Kasparov continues to lobby for freedom in the former Soviet Union and beyond. In September, Reason spoke with the chess grandmaster in New York about what it was like to be the beneficiary of a catastrophically failed system and what lessons the world—especially American democratic socialists—should remember three decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Interview by Nick Gillespie. Cameras by Jim Epstein and Kevin Alexander. Edited by Ian Keyser. Intro and Graphics by Isaac Reese. Production assistance by Regan Taylor.
Music Credit: "Elevation" by Stanley Gurvich via Artlist
Photo Credits: Julian Dufort; Design Pics/Newscom; Sovfoto Universal Images Group/Newscom; TASS/ZUMA Press/Newscom; KPA/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Keystone Pictures USA/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; KEYSTONE Pictures USA/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Karpov Sergei/Itar-Tass/ABACA/Newscom; Karpov Sergei/Itar-Tass/ABACA/Newscom; Novoderezhkin Anton/Itar-Tass/ABACA/Newscom; Keystone Pictures USA/ZUMA Press/Newscom; SERGEI KARPUKHIN/REUTERS/Newscom; STRINGER/RUSSIA/REUTERS/Newscom; Photoshot/Newscom; STAFF/REUTERS/Newscom; TASS/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Cornelia Gus/picture-alliance / dpa/Newscom; Mirrorpix/Newscom; Siegfried Pilz/United Archives/Roba/Newscom; United Archives / Schweigmann/United Archives/Roba/Newscom; Keystone Pictures USA/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; akg-images/Newscom; akg-images/Newscom; Fine Art Images / Heritage Images/Newscom; Arnie Sachs - CNP / MEGA / Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom; Bert Verhoff/Pictures From History/Newscom; Antonello Nusca/Polaris/Newscom; Antonello Nusca/Polaris/Newscom; Antonello Nusca/Polaris/Newscom; Alexander Demianchuk/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Rob Croes/Anefo; www.kremlin.ru; David Shankbone / Wikimedia Commons; Gerhard Hund / Wikimedia Commons; GFHund / Wikimedia Commons; Owen Williams / Wikimedia Commons; Petar Milošević / Wikimedia Commons; Rob Croes / Anefo / Wikimedia Commons; Ivan Simochkin / Wikimedia Commons
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Collectivism is great at sacrificing pawns.
You go queen.
The current collectivists want productive people to keep paying into the broken system. Or shorter, “Just send the check, mate.”
You pwned him.
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail …. Visit Here
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FGh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........VISIT HERE
It is a black and white issue.
Hey Guys, I know you read many news comments and posts to earn money online jobs. Some people don’t know how to earn money and are saying to fake it. You trust me. I just started this 4 weeks ago. I’ve got my FIRST check total of $1850, pretty cool. I hope you tried it.AQz You don’t need to invest anything. Just click and open the page to click the first statement and check jobs .. ..
Go Here................ Pays 24
With collectivism, everyone gets rooked.
Knightly...
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily.HFs simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now............... VISIT HERE
And there are 2 White Knights on every board.
And Kings get regendered as neutered pawns. Serves the white ones right, but the black ones get caught up in it too.
And the collectivists will always leave you to pick up the check, mate.
Collectivism, admittedly has a checkered past.
Nice!
By the early 2010s, he had been arrested for participating in unauthorized anti-government demonstrations and was widely believed to be the author of a popular petition demanding Putin's resignation.
You know who else is being arrested for unauthorized anti-government demonstrations?
Republicans who literally smeared shit in the halls of the Capital?
Yeah, balanced my ass. If you were balanced, 90% of such comments would refer to the Burn Loot Murder squads who did far more damage and have gotten away with it.
Oh yeah. I didn't sufficiently condemn BLM which makes anything I say about the innocent Trump tourists invalid.
Remember folks, never take what someone says a face value. Judge what they say based upon your perception of their politics.
No, you're a lying sack of lefty shit
You didn’t condemn BLM or antifa at all.
Trust sarcasmic to fuck up every time he posts.
The poop story came from a Democratic party aide who said he saw someone had tracked it on their shoes from the bathroom. Nobody else witnessed it, and the FBI reports don't mention it. The Washington Post took the aide's poop story and called it "smeared" from the bathroom, and then all you evil idiots turned it into another fire extinguisher story.
My guess, that aide saw muddy bootprints or was fabulizing. But no, nobody literally smeared shit on the walls of the Capitol, you stunned cunt.
The only thing smeared in shit is your trailer.
Once again, TDS is all you can think of. No, I was thinking of people in Australia asking nicely to not be imprisoned in their homes.
Excuse me for it being my first diagnosis. It's so prevalent.
Charles Schenk?
Actual insurrectionists in Portland and Seattle who tried to set up autonomous zones?
Well, no, they've never spent a day in jail.
A lot of young Iranians match that description too.
It's a good interview but Gillespie's mic is turned up way too loud.
The sound guy asked him if he wanted his mic turned down or up.
Nick replied, “Bitch up.”
All good questions, but what we really want to know:
Could he beat Beth Harmon?
Could he beat Beth Harmon on drugs?
In Russia, there now more free speech. Getting cancelled, for not calling a tranny by a preferred pronoun or for simply being openly opposed to affirmative action, doesn't happen over there. Also they have something like a 20% flat tax on all income. In the US, if you make a lot of money, governments end up taking something like 40% of it, and they add inflation on top of it. I would much prefer to be a Russian in Russia now. I do not consider the USA to be the land of the free. In some ways the USA is at the center of a new wave of global Marxism. FWIW i do not consider myself a libertarian even though I take many libertarian positions. There are now too many Marxists in the libertarian camp.
We have entire stadiums every week shouting derisions towards our president. Could that happen in Russia? If no, then less free speech.
Fuck Joe Biden!
Russia has a flat 13% income tax.
Great. Move there.
Food trucks too. Worker's paradise.
"Getting cancelled, for not calling a tranny by a preferred pronoun or for simply being openly opposed to affirmative action, doesn’t happen over there."
Not government action; irrelevant. I bet you can use the n-word as much as you want over there without your friends looking sidewise at you, too! Nifty.
This "not government action" trope gets a bit tiresome. The whole economy is awash in government money. Where do you think public sector retirement funds invest their money? Are you trying to tell me that they're *not* influencing the private sector in a leftward direction?
The public and private sectors are highly interpenetrated now and as long as a powerful segment of society sees private wealth as something that can just be taken mafi-style and then spent however whims dictate, this situation is only going to get worse.
Then of course, I don't claim to be a libertarian, precisely because if I did identify as a libertarian I would then have to change my positions to match yours. So, no thank you.
I'd like to know, though, even if every private institution were truly private in some platonic sense, and they still were all in favor of Marxist speech suppression, why would I be OK with that? Remember, if you answer this question you are talking to a non-libertarian so you have to do more than just invoke libertarian axioms.
Because suppression isn't profitable. That's why it's always forced.
By the way, all the cool kids have me on mute because true libertarians worship Republicans. Which means I'm not a true libertarian.
I don’t have you mute, sugar bear.
I regret that I have but two thumbs to up this interview
++
Kasparov is 100% a CIA asset. Fuck him.
He, like other spies, ames to please his masters.
You’re too good.
awesome..
Nice Blog, keep it up for more information like this.
Like in "Ghostbusters," here we have "Nickless..." I'm gonna MISSSSSSSS that guy...