Tech billionaire Elon Musk is known for leading Tesla and SpaceX, as one of the visionaries behind PayPal, and for hyping bitcoin and a bold plan to colonize Mars.
He's not just one of the planet's richest people, he's one of its biggest recipients of government handouts, according to Lisa Conyers and Phil Harvey, authors of Welfare for the Rich: How Your Tax Dollars End Up in Millionaires' Pockets—And What You Can do About It. Conyers is a veteran journalist and co-author with Harvey of 2016's The Human Cost of Welfare. Harvey is a successful businessman and philanthropist who supports many libertarian organizations, including Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes this website.
By 2015, companies led by Musk had already gotten billions in subsidies, tax breaks, and other handouts. He's not alone. There are thousands of other immensely rich people who are constantly milking the government for special perks, carveouts, and handouts.
Here are five of the very worst ways they do that.
1. Agricultural Subsidies
Since 1933, when Congress passed the first farm support bill, the government has been shoveling billions of dollars in the form of crop insurance, cash payouts, and other subsidies to the smaller and smaller number of American farmers. As Conyers and Harvey document, former Obama commerce secretary and billionaire Penny Pritzker received $1.6 million in subsidies between 1996 and 2006, and current Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem was part of a family business that got over $3 million in subsidies between 1995 and 2008.
2. Sugar Subsidies
Because of protectionist tariffs and price supports, Americans pay around triple the world price for sugar, thanks to efforts by billionaires like Fanjul brothers, Alfy and Pepe, dubbed "the first family of corporate welfare" by Time magazine.
3.
Many, if not most, major pro sports team owners are billionaires.
Yet between 1997 and 2015, almost half of all construction costs for new NFL stadiums were covered by taxpayers. In the case of Raymond James Stadium, home to Super Bowl champs the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, taxpayers ponied up 100 percent of building costs. Plus, the team basically gets all revenue generated at the stadium too.
4. Mickey Mouse Subsidies
The Walt Disney Corporation, with a market cap of $368 billion, is the heavyweight champ among theme park operators when it comes to sweetheart deals. Disney "returned $2.3 billion to investors in 2017 alone" write Conyers and Harvey, and Bob Iger, chairman and CEO, "earns $45 million a year." So of course Disneyland, located in Anaheim, California, needs handouts.
Twenty-five years ago, Anaheim built Disney a new parking structure that cost $108 million and then leased it to the company for the high price of $1 a year. In 2015, the city agreed to exempt the park from paying entertainment taxes for 45 years, and in 2016, it agreed to a $650 million tax rebate on a luxury hotel Disney built near "the happiest place on Earth."
5. Energy Freebies
Over the past decade, Peabody, the largest private coal company in the world, pulled in around $275 million in state and federal subsidies while generating $5.6 billion in revenue in 2017. Exelon, a power company that specializes in nuclear energy, generated $34 billion in revenue in 2017, the year after it gulled New York state into giving it $7.6 billion to keep four aging and underperforming nuclear power plants going.
A few years back, New York state also shelled out $750 million to build a factory for Elon Musk's renewable energy company Solar City. Elected officials then decreed the company would pay no property taxes for a decade, saving the billionaire another $260 million.
But as Conyers and Harvey argue, in our information-rich world, citizen activists are fighting back. In Louisiana, when one group learned that Exxon and other gas and oil companies were getting away without paying property taxes, it led to a new public accountability law.
They also point to websites that track subsidies and handouts, empowering citizens to protest the use of tax dollars to gild the pockets of mega-corporations and the billionaires who own them.
If and when Elon Musk actually makes it to Mars, let's make sure he buys his own ticket.
Narrated by Nick Gillespie. Edited by John Osterhoudt. Additional graphics by Paul Detrick and Meredith Bragg. Color correction by Regan Taylor.
Photo: Steve Jurvetson/Flickr/Creative Commons; Daniel Oberhaus/Flickr/Creative Commons; JD Lasica/Flickr/Creative Commons; Maurizio Pesce/Flickr/Creative Commons; Airman Magazine/Flickr/Creative Commons; Commerce Department/ZUMA Press/Newscom; JOE MARINO/UPI/Newscom; Taylor Jones/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Taylor Jones/ZUMA Press/Newscom; K.C. Alfred/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Bill Bachmann/DanitaDelimont.com "Danita Delimont Photography"/Airman 1st Class Jacob Wrightsma/2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs/Newscom; Stephen M. Dowell/TNS/Newscom; Douglas R. Clifford/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA; Mark Eades/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Clem Murray/TNS/Newscom; Heather Charles/MCT/Newscom; RASHID ABBASI/REUTERS/Newscom; LEE CELANO/REUTERS/Newscom; LEE CELANO/REUTERS/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Where is my $2000?
White Knight has it. I wouldn't stand for that if I were you.
Don't look at me. I don't have it!
When this is over it will be worth $200,000 in 2022 money.
You dropped three zeros.
Is it time to empty my savings and invest in ammo and rice?
Don't forget gold and silver.
https://medium.com/@thenolistsecretreview/marketibot-review-demetris-d-papa-marketibot-oto-discount-5000-bonuses-67b1ed09daf8
https://medium.com/@edupayreview/changio-review-mike-from-maine-edit-and-use-practically-any-page-on-the-internet-8d732a3c8d05
Yeah, Musk's fortune just doesn't have the same legitimacy to it that Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch's does. I bet Musk grew up privileged too. Whereas Mr. Koch started with nothing and earned each and every one of his 61,700,000,000 dollars through hard work and dedication.
#InDefenseOf(SelfMade)Billionaires
Another day, another Biden Brain Freeze. Check out today's video of POTUS Biden in a Hardware store. And yesterday's video where he 'forgot' the name of his own Defense Secretary.
This is pathetic. The entire world is watching.
Worse than Reagan at the tail end of his 2nd term. By a longshot.
Billionaires can run to FL and TX to escape the socialists (and libertarians) in NY and CA. But even those states are turning blue. So what's the answer? The rich should fund resort colonies for their advocates who can then spend their days fighting on social media for fair policies for everyone, and thereby protect the rich from the circling hounds. (This will also free up jobs so that the poor can work and support themselves and obviate big government and charities.) In fact the war today isn't in the voting booth or at the capitol, but online.
WTF? Did y'all get a memo saying this was the Topic of the Week?
Musk is too independent and threatens the global socialist elite, thus he must be taken down.
Reason is just doing their assignment as part of that effort.
Three articles on Elon Musk? You guys know he can’t run for president, right?
I was thinking something similar. Is it just me, or was there never a Reason headline complaining about Jeff Bezos in this way?
Dee will be around shortly to cite an article from 8 years ago to tell you you’re wrong.
Or else to pettifog about the definition of headline.
It’s all envy driven.
Because him smoking pot on Joe Rogan was closer to the libertarian moment than anything accomplished by this rag in the last five years?
Are we now supporting corporate handouts and bailouts?
Stfu Cathy Newman.
I wonder what an expose' on the Congress Critters over a number of years in government would look like? For example, AOC is now in her second term, what was her net worth going in and what is it now? Now that would be a story.
Billionaires taking advantage of the government's hand-outs to keep them around and producing in their cities/states? An expose' on sand being gritty and therefore empowered would be more compelling.
Look at the before and after net worth of chocolate Jesus.
Rich enough to have a house in Martha's Vineyard, the whitest place on Earth, and nobody bats an eye.
AOC is all about equity and wealth redistribution. So she's probably worth millions.
Why is AOC so special as to be allowed to use Gov-Guns to STEAL? If people want to STEAL by gun-point; they need to STOP hiding behind corrupt government as an excuse.
Armed bank robber at the trial, "But I was just making my own 'equality' and 'wealth' by gun-forced 'distribution'."
Point; Salad dressing word-games of criminal acts doesn't make the act any less criminal.
For the record soldier feild in Chicago is owned by the city and not the bears. The bears rent it out, (as do many other event planners) so it's a subsidy to the city. Still shouldn't happen though.
The cure?
VALUE = WEALTH!
NOT; Power to Steal = Wealth.
A concept the simpleton mind of the left compulsively ignores is that billionaires are either directly subsidized by lefty subsidizing (i.e. stealing) legislation or indirectly by 'poor' people's free (i.e. stolen) money that funnels DIRECTLY into billionaire suppliers of market-value.
Every-time lefties try and construe and corrupt the basic 'fair' concepts of supply and demand they just prop up more inequality! The fact that lefties can be blind-sided on the proven history of such results (in progress even) is just a matter of being too stupid. The fact they love sticking their STUPID onto others by Gov-Gun Force is down right criminal!
People need to stand-up for their rights against such Tyrannical Stupidity. State NULLIFICATION of unconstitutional federal Nazi Policy (i.e. National Socialism).
Still doing this story. Like the 3rd or 4th post on this.
Musk wandered off the reservation with his "GameStronk" post and then went and pissed off Bezos, so the JournoList smear machine has been activated.
You kinda missed the actual biggie - mortgage and other debt deductions.
Tax deductions may not look like subsidies because they in fact aren't the same as direct subsidies. That's not what the uberrich need. They are perfectly capable of paying for anything as long as they are able to acquire money created out of thin air. So is anyone for that matter. The difference is the wealthy have assets, the poor don't. Like well duh. And assets are what is used to collateralize new loans.
What debt deduction is - is a subsidy by government to purchase things by money created out of thin air rather than money that had to be earned first. Available almost exclusively to the rich.
and really the main problem is not the skew towards the wealthy - though that is the skew that tends to lead to revolution/socialism/blahblahblah. The main problem is that the skew is towards the idle/rentier and away from stuff that has to be earned first. And for whatever reason, libertarians seem blind to that problem.
If you know how it’s done, why aren’t you doing it?
Because I was taught to avoid debt if I could avoid it and to pay it off if/when I incurred it. Or hell - to save up for future spending ahead of time by avoiding consumption today.
All sorts of propaganda that is taught - but not practiced.
You're wildly dismissing the 'poor' bankruptcy forgive-me policies.
Nothing speaks this louder than the latest student loan erasing being pitched.
I don't really blame Musk or anyone else for taking the money, as much as I blame corrupt politicians and career bureaucrats for giving it to them.
Is this the THIRD time reason has published the same fucking shit?
First we had the reason interview, then we had the obligatory write-up by Nick after, and now we have... another article.
These people are really not businesspersons. They are courtiers, like the courtiers of old their massive wealth comes more from their serving and flattering their sovereigns.
I've got an even better idea. Howe about the government just stops spending that money.
Look, they punch above their weight in other ways, you know.
Five percent of them commit forty five percent of all crimes.
I think that’s impressive.