Facebook's Libra Yields Before Congress. Bitcoin Can Never Be Controlled.
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez will never get to interrogate Satoshi Nakamoto.
HD DownloadSatoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym of a mysterious software developer who released a white paper describing a new peer-to-peer currency called bitcoin on an obscure mailing list in 2008, then disappeared two years later.
David Marcus is a Facebook executive who was grilled in two congressional hearings this week about a new digital currency project called "Libra," which the social media giant is billing as a less volatile version of bitcoin that can be monitored and controlled by governments.
"We are fully committed to working with regulators, here and around the world," Marcus said on Tuesday before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. "And let me be clear and unambiguous: Facebook will not offer the Libra digital currency until we have fully addressed regulators' concerns and received appropriate approvals."
The hearings were a useful reminder that one of the many reasons that bitcoin is a revolutionary technology with profound political consequences, and Facebook's Libra is a payment network with some interesting properties, is that Congress can never make Satoshi Nakamoto appear on national television to be grilled by lawmakers.
Written and narrated by Jim Epstein; Graphics by Austin Bragg and Meredith Bragg.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Photo Credit: Stefani Reynolds - CNP / MEGA / Newscom
David Marcus Photo Credit: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well, hell, if governments can't control the money, they might lose control over us. That cannot be allowed to happen!
Hi sockpuppet!
Most of us only have two feet. How many sock puppets can someone have? Or be?
You seem obsessed. By the way, having re-read my comment, it might be misinterpreted as sarcasm, when, in fact, it was NOT meant as sarcasm.
"What could possibly go wrong" indeed, Senator. What could possibly go wrong with an unelected bunch of political hacks controlling money?
Audit the Fed!
That is too bad because AOC interviews are hilariously ludicrous.
They are. She is so earnest, so incomprehensible, and so mockable.
So mockable even an 8 year old can do it.
But enough about PB's basement.
So mockable even a cave man can do it.
Well, hell, if governments can’t control the money, they might lose control over us. That cannot be allowed to happen!
sak karepmu su asu jancok https://buddypress.org/members/andijati/profile/
no, but the government can just prohibit any transactions from bitcoin to any reputable financial instituion in dollars or other recognized currency. you could still ignore them, but you'd risk arrest and fines.
FB is about the last human institution anybody would trust to run a financial system. Surely Zuckerberg knows that, right?
Exactly. I would trust FB with my financial transactions about as much as I would trust them to protect my privacy. Which is not at all.
Not only can Bitcoin be controlled, it is being controlled: it is largely dead for commercial transactions due to regulatory uncertainty. And that’s not just because the government hates it, it’s because financial institutions hate it too (in the same way cab drivers hate Uber) and lobby the government.