Will a Shutdown Finally Shrink Government?
Plus: the Comey indictment, Trump deploys the National Guard to Portland, Eric Adams exits New York City's mayoral race, and a listener asks about cyclical theories of history

This week, editors Peter Suderman, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, and Matt Welch discuss whether the impending government shutdown will actually rein in the federal bureaucracy. They consider whether there is anything to gain from a shutdown, how past shutdowns have played out, and whether the risk of growing executive power outweighs the risk of uncontrolled spending.
They also examine the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey and whether it's about retribution or substance, President Donald Trump's deployment of federal troops to Portland, and New York Mayor Eric Adams' decision to exit the mayoral race. A listener question prompts a conversation about cyclical theories of history and whether frameworks like The Fourth Turning help explain our current moment or merely provide the illusion of clarity.
0:00—Shutdown showdown and shrinking the government
9:24—Russell Vought and the growth of executive power
25:34—James Comey faces an indictment
31:38—Eric Adams drops out of NYC mayoral race
40:42—Listener question on cyclical frameworks in history
48:06—Trump sends federal police to Portland
56:30—Weekly cultural recommendations
Mentioned in This Podcast
"Government Set To Shut Down Tomorrow," by Liz Wolfe
"The American New Right Looks Like the European Old Right," by Jack Nicastro and Phillip W. Magness
"How GOP Fiscal Sanity Died, in 7 Easy Steps," by Matt Welch
"Shutdown Highlights Basic Fact: Most of Government is 'Non-Essential'," by Nick Gillespie
"The Libertarian Case for Postmodernism," by Nick Gillespie
"In Trump's Tussle With James Comey, You Should Hope Everybody Loses," by J.D. Tuccille
"Trump's Public Comments Could Further Complicate the Shaky Case Against James Comey," by Jacob Sullum
"Kash Patel Tellingly Ties James Comey's Indictment to the Legally Unrelated 'Russiagate Hoax,'" by Jacob Sullum
"The Deep-State Liars of the #Resistance," by Matt Welch
"What Does It Mean for Trump To Designate Antifa a 'Terrorist Organization'?" by Matthew Petti
"The Tom Cotton Do-Over," by Matt Welch
"The Dream of the '90s Died in Portland," by Nancy Rommelmann
"Assata Shakur Stood With the Oppressors," by Billy Binion
r/NYC on Reddit: "Eric Adams wore this custom made robe to a Rosh Hashanah service in Brooklyn yesterday."
Upcoming Reason Events
"Is mass immigration good for America?" Join us for a Reason Versus live debate on October 2 in Washington, D.C.
Today's Sponsor:
You believe in limited government and support organizations that champion the ideals of a free society. But have you ensured that your charitable giving will leave a lasting legacy of liberty? Without a plan in place, your charitable legacy could fade—or worse, be redirected to causes that don't align with your values. At DonorsTrust, they help you secure your philanthropic vision for the long term. With a donor-advised fund, you can ensure that the groups you care about continue to receive support, even beyond your lifetime. And unlike other donor-advised funds, DonorsTrust respects your libertarian principles and ensures your charitable capital remains committed to advancing individual liberty. Your giving should reflect your values—not just today, but for years to come. Your Vision. Your Values. Your Impact. Go to http://DonorsTrust.org/Reason to ensure your philanthropy continues to champion liberty for generations to come.
- Producer: Paul Alexander
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Will a Shutdown Finally Shrink Government?
Not if a judge has anything to say about it.
He isnt even asking congress.
A simple "no" would suffice. Those of us who aren't kids have lived through loads of these, and the answer is always the same: savings later, spending now. It's certainly less bad when the Rs are in charge, but less bad is nothing to celebrate. We needed another decade of DOGE to get anywhere near sanity.
Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
This can never be forgotten as long as that hack is employed at Reason.
No. The only way to shrink government is to prohibit government coercion. It will then be limited to it's proper function of defending liberty.
But then it won't need to be limited. It's like saying the only way to get rid of bad medicine would be to abolish disease.
Except that 100,000 federal employees have committed to quitting (and taking Trump’s buyout). Possibly in response to Trump’s promise to fire a lot of non-essential federal employees.