Aaron Sibarium: Is DEI Over?
The Washington Free Beacon's Aaron Sibarium discusses the various slashes the Trump administration has made to DEI projects and USAID.
Is the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) movement over? Just asking questions.
Aaron Sibarium is a good, old-fashioned muckraking journalist over at the Washington Free Beacon who exposes things the left would probably rather hide. He joins the show today to discuss President Donald Trump's executive orders relating to DEI programs.
Sources Referenced:
- Executive order: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing
- "HHS Spends Hundreds of Millions Spreading DEI Through Medical Community," by OpenTheBooks
- Executive order: Ending Illegal Discrimination And Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity
- DEI definition from a 2023 Health and Human Resources document
- Executive order: Ending Radical Indoctrination in K–12 Schooling
- Aaron Sibarium's fake tweet reported to police, from "Inside State-Run 'Bias-Response Hotlines,' Where Fellow Citizens Can Report Your 'Offensive Joke,'"
- NIH on X: Last year, $9B of the $35B that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) granted for research was used for administrative overhead, what is known as "indirect costs."
- White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt Mocks U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) spending
Chapters:
- 00:00 Coming up…
- 00:36 Trump clip from inauguration speech
- 05:08 1965 Lindon B. Johnson executive order
- 07:33 Why was President Joe Biden so radical on this stuff?
- 20:54 Firing Health and Human Services DEI employees
- 25:06 Should Trump be messing with the private sector?
- 48:31 Even Trump is constrained here in certain ways.
- 53:17 Ridding USAID of DEI
- 01:00:34 Is there a legitimate role for USAID?
- 01:06:40 Will Elon Musk reform government like he did X?
- 01:12:34 Calling an Oregon bias hotline
- 01:17:04 What is the question you think more people should be asking?
- Producer: John Osterhoudt
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We can only hope.
"07:33 Why was President Joe Biden so radical on this stuff?"
Weekend at Bernie's
Nope.
There will be a rebranding, and they will drop back undercover for awhile, but it will never go away.
Woke companies, woke policies and woke people should all be destroyed where we find them. Until everyone gets the message that it is not ok to be ‘woke’.
Of course DEI isn't over. At most they will change the term again. PC, woke, affirmative action, pride, reparatons, etc is not going away just because the right found the current umbrella term for far left activism. If anything, "DEI" will just further branch out into more insane and destructive things.
It is at least good that there is a powerful push against it and growing public support in opposing it.
Woke U but this time Piven is the Dean since we don't have Jessica Walter anymore
You know I gotta do it. You know I'm gonna do it. I mean, come on... you know it's coming...
Hello my fellow kids...
No.
The only way that it will truly die is when corporate America fires all of the HR and PR people that got DEI powerful in the first place.
Axing them looks worse than embracing woke, so they, and we, have to wait until their balls drop or retirement.
nothing is ever over ideas are tough to kill.
DEI is non-discrimination and opening up the workforce to all qualified applicants. I would surly hope that the US has not abandoned non-discrimination.
Also: I am sick of MAGAs redefining DEI to mean the exact opposite, or equating it with CRT, affirmative action, or quotas. Those MAGAs can go suck rocks.
Marxism is so unpopular they have to lie about every part of it.
Nothing I mentioned even remotely relates to Marxism. MAGAs use "Marxism" as a term to describe anything they don't like.
Can we please agree that MAGAs are fascist shits?
We know what you are.
I think the one agreement here is you're a fucking retard.
“It’s not Marxism if I don’t call it that!”
I'm glad to hear you're sick.
You remain absolutely retarded.
Poor molly.
DEI is non-discrimination and opening up the workforce to all qualified applicants.
No it's not, not even by their own definition it's not.
DEI is about opening up opportunity to all by removing barriers, proactively combating discrimination, and engaging in outreach to find qualified candidates. Wheelchair ramps are DEI, ADA accommodation are DEI. Training hiring managers on anti-discrimination is DEI. Making the workplace/school a welcoming place for all is DEI. DEI does not include quotas or "reverse discrimination".
Hypothetically, if DEI is as I described it, would you oppose it?
It’s about removing white people. And it isn’t as you described it.
Stop lying.
Nice try to dodge the question. I will take your answer to be "No." Truth is the anti-DEI hysteria is about reinstating discrimination. Republicans have opposed all anti-discrimination efforts for the past 30 years. It is not credible that they suddenly love equal opportunity.
Diversity - of thought not of skin color or place of origin.
Equity - meaning you retain what you earned less the liabilities you incurred.
Inclusion- of the principles set forth in the Declaration.
So I read somewhere that like half of LA burned to the ground recently. What's up with that?
If you track the global warming hockey stick graph, you'll notice it goes up significantly in Trump's lifetime.
Which is a statement with 3 fallacies
!) You assume a causal connection, you don't prove it, you assume it
2) It ignores what he himself said : In a 2015 speech, Trump called global warming “a money-making industry.” “A lot of it's a hoax,”
3) THis is more a rhetorical point: You hide in the bushes but we know you think global warming is worth spending Janet Yellen's "At least $3 TRILLION a year" k--- fhe fallacy of saying an issue is just "is it true" rather than 'Even if true , is this the best use of that money" and "even if true , is this the best way to deal with it?
YOu can go now
Local story.
DEI comes from the schools, two generations and the teachers and students are all DEI. the proof was there under Secy Bennett and now is undeniable
2 of 3 Americans Wouldn’t Pass U.S. Citizenship Test
A survey found that people aged 65 and older were more likely to pass the test than those aged 45 and younger.
https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2018-10-12/2-of-3-americans-wouldnt-pass-us-citizenship-test
This is one Trump initiative that no one can honestly argue against.