Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Dial 'T' for Terrible Telehealth Laws
How restrictions on telemedicine are forcing doctors to choose between following the law and obeying their ethical obligations.

When Mike Abell's young son was diagnosed with a rare form of brain cancer, a phone call proved to be a vital lifeline.
Today, that phone call might be illegal—thanks to some strict limitations that New Jersey places on telemedicine calls with doctors in other states.
"As parents of a child with cancer, you're already fighting an impossible journey," says Abell. Those rules, meanwhile, are only "making it harder."
At the other end of that phone call was Dr. Shannon MacDonald, a specialist in proton radiation therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. She treated Abell's son, Jun, who made a full recovery.
On one hand, modern medicine makes use of incredible, cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, public policy has forced the industry to remain stuck in an earlier technological age—before phones, before the internet, before Zoom—when a doctor had to be in the same room as a patient to provide treatment.
"Physicians are confused. Our ethical obligations are in direct contradiction with the law," says MacDonald. "Your ethical obligation is the right thing to do, but it's technically against the law and it could put your license at risk."
A doctor who treats a patient in New Jersey without holding an active New Jersey medical license could face three to five years in prison and a fine of up to $15,000. Separately, the unlicensed practice of telemedicine and telehealth in New Jersey carries a civil penalty of $10,000 for a first offense and $20,000 for subsequent offenses.
And it's not just New Jersey. More than half the states in the country have "clear barriers to across-state-line" telehealth or lack a clear way for physicians to legally use telehealth to check-in with patients in another state, according to a report published earlier this year by the Cicero Institute and the Reason Foundation (which publishes this website).
Now, both Abell and MacDonald are challenging that New Jersey law with the help of the Pacific Legal Foundation, a libertarian law firm.
"Tomorrow, Dr. McDonald could get a phone call from somebody in New Jersey saying 'Hey, I was referred to you. I have this problem,'" says Caleb Trotter, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation. In that moment, MacDonald would have to decide whether to break the law or to put in the time and effort to first get licensed in New Jersey. Neither is ideal.
"And in the meantime, they're either going to have to wait for treatment," says Trotter. "I don't want to be dramatic, but it can be life and death."
Further reading for this week's episode:
"NJ Makes Cancer Treatment More Difficult for Children and Families," by Mike Abell, NJ.com
"It's Time To Permanently Suspend Regulatory Barriers to Telehealth," by J.D. Tuccile, Reason
"In 30 States, You Can't Use Telehealth With Out-of-State Doctors," by Caleb Trotter, Pacific Legal Foundation
"Rating States on Telehealth Best Practices," by Vittorio Nastasi, Reason Foundation
- Producer: Hunt Beaty
- Producer: Hunt Beaty
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One of the Teletubbies supports Chase.
Santa Claus (R-Hell), Who Gives All Things to "All" (real-American) People (butt first asks for "Citizen? Papers Please!" before giving you your tax money back) supports Trump and Vance!
OT Post: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/10/immigration-working-class-wages/680128/ THEY TOOK OUR JERBS!!!! This is just a TOTAL fib!!!
Democrats have fought tooth-n-nail so that ONLY 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) are the tool of healthcare. Yet somehow they don't see the stupidity in their reasoning. 'Guns' are going to supply healthcare???? HOW??? Face the facts; The only thing that separates government from any other entity is its legal use of 'Guns' against you.
Really what they all believe in their hearts is that enslavement (slavery) of those icky people is okay. Once the party of slavery; still the party of slavery.
Another 'reason' red herring, confusing a phone call with telehealth. If it was telehealth, how did MacDonald deliver those protons over a phone line?
I'm pretty sure that "telehealth" mostly just means phone calls (or equivalent) with doctors.
Sometimes more can occur during a phone call. Reach out, reach out and touch someone.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/college-football/article-12533299/Michigan-State-Mel-Tucker-FIRED-without-compensation-coach-masturbated-phone-call.html
Another stupid comment by someone who doesn't understand either healthcare or government regulations. McDonald (arguably) took the patient's history, gathered evidence of symptoms, made a diagnosis and prescribed a treatment. Actually delivering the treatment is very often the job of local technicians and not the doctor's job at all.
I have no problem with New Jersey requiring that doctors treating New Jersey patients have New Jersey state licenses
Surely you can find a consultant in the state of New Jersey who can do the telemedicine you might need.
if there is some kind of problem and this telemedicine doctor is a menace to patients, how will the state of New Jersey censure him if they don’t have a New Jersey license?
National licensure is the usually offered solution but many states don’t wish to give up their control.
By that logic, New Jersey should be able to prevent their residents from ever crossing a state line to talk to another doctor - yet that is both no the case and would be remarkably stupid to try.
And no, you often can't find a "consultant" who is equally qualified in rare disease or treatments. Doctors to treat your cold are a dime a dozen but not all diseases are so well understood.
re: "how will the state of NJ censure him" - how do they censure the doctor in New York when a patient crosses state lines? They don't because the provision of care follows the doctor's location. If NJ thinks a NY doctor is a quack, they can petition the NY regulators to step in. Or even better, they'd keep their noses out of it entirely and let patients make their own informed choices.