Phil Magness: Who Really Pays the Most Taxes?
Economist and author Phil Magness debunks a recent New York Times piece and shoddy academic work about the rich and their taxes.
How much do billionaires really pay in taxes?
"Today, the superrich control a greater share of America's wealth than during the Gilded Age of Carnegies and Rockefellers," said Gabriel Zucman in a recent New York Times opinion piece entitled, "It's Time to Tax the Billionaires."
Zucman is an economist at the Paris School of Economics and the University of California, Berkeley, and a frequent collaborator with superstar economist Thomas Piketty, author of the extremely influential book on wealth inequality, Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
But today's guest, Phil Magness—an economic historian, author, and the David J. Theroux Chair in Political Economy at the Independent Institute—says the work of Piketty and his circle of inequality-obsessed colleagues is deeply flawed and sometimes outright deceptive. He points out that billionaires do pay taxes…a lot of taxes. And the inequality literature is riddled with errors and bad statistics.
Watch the full conversation on Reason's YouTube channel or the Just Asking Questions podcast feed on Apple, Spotify, or your preferred podcatcher.
Sources referenced in this conversation:
- Magness' viral post debunking Zucman
- Zucman's article discussed in the introduction
- CBO: Tax credits awarded by quintile
- Zucman's explanation for excluding the Earned Income Tax Credit (p. 19)
- Tax Foundation: Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2024 Update
- Piketty's inequality U-graph
- Auten-Splinter adjustment, after-tax income for top 1 percent
- Piketty: "r > g"
- Piketty: Capital income has increased as labor income has fallen
Timestamps:
- 00:00 Introduction to Just Asking Questions: Billionaires and Taxes
- 01:38 Unpacking the Misleading Tax Rate Graphs
- 06:38 The Political Motivations Behind Misleading Tax Narratives
- 15:39 Analyzing the Impact of Tax Credits on Lower-Income Earners
- 22:32 The Real Tax Burden: A Closer Look at Wealthy Americans' Contributions
- 27:05 Countering Piketty's Inequality Data With Accurate Accounting
- 34:58 The Practical Problems With a Wealth Tax
- 40:04 Piketty's Inequality Narrative and Its Flaws
- 48:50 Global Financial Transparency and Taxation Proposals
- 54:40 The Moral and Economic Case Against High Taxation
- 57:48 Listener Q&A: Defending the Show's Title
- Producer: John Osterhoudt
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Illegal aliens!
Yeah, it's just not fair that the greys are stealin' mah munny!
Wealth is not income.
Most billionaires do NOT have a wage or salary. Billionaires do pay taxes on their corporate gains. I mean, duh. And that is taxed at a different rate than income for a reason. It does not mean they are cheating. Most dividends and stuff get rolled right back into investements. So no income.
And you are right that wealth is not income. I own a home. It's nearly paid off. Let's imagine imagine it's $500,000. Does that mean I had a $500,000 income? Fuck no! Should I pay 35% of that $500,000 every year? Fuck no! Demanding that billionaires pay taxes on their net worth is as stupid as asking homeowners to pay income tax on their homes.
If the democrats manage to push through some kind of unconstitutional wealth tax, then it will be time to get rid of them and their party once and for all. As elections and the courts will have totally failed us.
I'll be honest. I expected you to come out in favor of wealth taxes, based on some of your earlier positions I've noticed in the comments section. So color me pleasantly surprised.
I do have to ask, though, are you against it on principle, or because you are worried it would get applied to homeowners (or the top percentage of homeowners with homes above a certain threshold) that would inevitably affect you personally? I'm not accusing you of this being your reason, just asking the question because I would like to know.
It's mostly misdirection. Populist demagogues almost always want to convince the people that some scapegoat is responsible for their unfortunate circumstances and if only they could be restrained from abusing society everything would become a paradise. Unfortunately, there is almost never much truth to the button-pushing but there's a sucker born every minute and the politicians can almost always capitalize on them to grant them increasing personal power to fight for the little guy, even if it means that the little guy is actually worse off in the process.
Cannot agree more.
"Populist demagogues"
Why is "populism" bad?
A capitalist, in a free market, is taking risk, selling something in a free market, they can lose everything. A risk taker, no more no less. Sometimes a risk taker that labors in their own business. Yes, they built that.
A laborer is selling their labor, in a free market. Populism removes the risk of competition or basic competency from labor and promotes protectionism. Think Jill Steins guaranteed job/wage or leftist/marxist ideology. Populism is socialism.
While there’s nothing wrong with being a laborer, not wanting debt and working hard, protectionism tends to collapse the working class, upward mobility and entire areas of society. See Fettermans district in Pennsylvania.
Populist laborers should rail against paying taxes, fees and want to shrink Government. labor will become more valuable as more firms compete with one another. Hell, even private union jobs are filled with family members who “know somebody”.
Who pays the most taxes?
Some dude from Pennsylvania named Barry:
Barry Tangert says he was charged more than 34 billion dollars in overdue taxes, penalties, and interest by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue.
The number is so big that it doesn’t even fit on one line.
Barry did reach out to the Department of Revenue to see what was going on and they told him they'd look into it and get back to him in a few weeks.
https://wjactv.com/news/local/pennsylvania-man-receives-34-billion-tax-bill-irs-investigating-taxes-money-revenue-error
Mr Koch got his moneys worth here
Careful, jealousy is addictive. If you don't watch out envy will eat you up from the inside and your corpse will be buried a bright shade of green. It has never bothered me that I am not fabulously wealthy. It does not bother me that someone else is, whether they earned it or inherited it. If you pretend that they don't have anything that you don't have and that it's not fair that they're rich and you're not, it might make you feel a little better but more likely it will make you try to drink away your bitterness.
The Koch encourage a subsidized illegal immigration policy costing the US 159B a year (last years estimate) to help subsidize their business costs. Fuck them.
I might be envious of a lot of billionaires, but Charles Koch or George Soros definitely aren't included. I don't like the constant smell of brimstone, thanks.
Say what you will of Koch and Soros, but that smell is your upper lip and wheels in your head, ML.
🙂
😉
I don't envy or hate the wealthy at all, but damnit, don't support the taxation, regulation, government subsidies, and above all, the rotten ideas that keep others from becoming wealthy too.
Elon Muskie is a prime example with his sucking on thr teat of NASA while pig-ignorantly morally scolding others against working from home, as seen here:
https://youtube.com/shorts/y5OHFt8QyiU?si=nYr5t2q7Izo2e8tX
I don't envy our evil capitalist oppressors. I want to become an evil capitalist oppressor.
p.s. - SkyNet was a public-private partnership
And look how THAT turned out.
Maybe I missed a movie or two. I remember the John Connor movie that takes place after the mother (Linda Hammilton) died where he kidnapped the veterinarian. In that movie Skynet was a government computer program that was sneaking out at night to mess with computer systems and conned the President into releasing it into the system so it could really fuck everything up. Doesn't that make skynet a government project?
Wolf of Wall Street: Fugazi Fugazi wealth explanation.
Hint..its numbers on a screen
https://youtu.be/cJOKgFbMdzY?si=y7F0Thg_G9uc7R_C
Additionally, the Democrats and the fed figured out a way to tax cash- inflation. All by design. Of course working people will become populist (their cash is being taxed with inflation) and eventually rail for a wealth tax. First they came for the Billionaires, then…
I haven't watched yet, though I did note Liz' duck lips in the still-shot, so I'll put it in my shuffle.
🙂
😉
Don't the rich figure the cost of their taxes into the cost of the goods and services they sell, as well into lowering the wages they would otherwise pay to workers and the dividends they would otherwise pay to shareholders?
Presumably that is what the wise rich would do, at least until they could lobby for lower or no taxes.
So, when are wealthy lefties like Comrade Bernie Sanders going to pay their "fair share" of taxes?
Oh, I'd say like nineteen ninety never.
Uh, it's the Twenty-First Century, so that would be Two Thousand and never.
Doesn't have the same ring to it.
Enter the endless *excuses* to STEAL. As long as people demand what the rich are providing you're only STEALING from yourselves as your Gov-Gun THEFT just gets added to the price of your demands.
The price of one's demand is either a free-market true resources value (theft doesn't change that demand) or it's a consequence of the 'armed-theft' itself like Elon Musk and Tesla getting rich by all the 'armed-theft' for $green$ energy lobbyists.
'Guns' don't make sh*t and theft is a total-negative by it's own UN-productive basis. The best anyone can do with a monopoly of 'Gun-Forces' is to ensure the Liberty and Justice for all.
When thinking "working rich", don't forget anyone with a professional degree: accountants, engineers, and the like. Anyone in those occupations can have $200,000+ salaries late in their careers. Or early, if they're quite good.
Everyone on my street are engineers, accountants, product marketeers, and the like. This is just a very nice suburban street. Most people hire gardeners and house cleaners but there isn't a polo pony or butler to be seen.
Needs a transcript.