Tara Isabella Burton: Self-Made, From Da Vinci to the Kardashians
Since the Renaissance, we've been increasingly able to define who we are as individuals. But is that a false freedom?

What does Kim Kardashian have in common with Leonardo Da Vinci?
Much more than you might have ever guessed, says Tara Isabella Burton, author of the new book Self-Made: Creating Our Identities From Da Vinci to the Kardashians. As in her previous work Strange Rites: New Religions for a Godless World, Tara explores the amazing and ever-increasing freedom we have to define our identities and all the complications, problems, and possibilities that come along with greater choice.
We talk about how figures as different as Frederick Douglass, Oscar Wilde, and Clara Bow exemplify aspects of self-fashioning; whether Kim, Kris, or Caitlyn Jenner is the ultimate Kardashian when it comes to reinvention; and how traditional and avant-garde cultures mix uneasily but inevitably in a free society.
Today's sponsors:
- BetterHelp. Are you at your best? Working with a therapist can help you get closer to the best version of you—because when you feel empowered, you're more prepared to take on everything life throws at you. If you're thinking of giving therapy a try, BetterHelp is a great option. It's convenient, flexible, affordable, and entirely online. Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist, and switch therapists anytime for no additional charge. If you want to live a more empowered life, therapy can get you there. Visit BetterHelp.com/TRI today to get 10 percent off your first month.
- Why We Can't Have Nice Things. A six-part Reason magazine podcast series about the frustrating and foolish aspects of American trade policy that make everyday items more expensive. From last year's sudden shortages of baby formula to the Jones Act and President Lyndon Johnson's infamous "chicken war," host Eric Boehm sits down with industry experts and libertarian policy wonks to explore how these counterproductive rules got made—and explains why they can be so difficult to undo.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The real da Vinci news is that his Salvator Mundi is being turned into a NFT like Trump Superhero cards.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,600 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,600 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
The modern question of our time is not how much or how free we are to create our own identity, but how much is the rest of society required to participate in your creation?
The followup question to this, which intersects with the levels of participation required by the rest of us is, how much of these self-created identities must be underwritten by technology, and if that technology isn't available or affordable to the person involved in their "promethean transformation", what level is society required to subsidize that technological underwriting?
If you want a good, deep dive into this subject that undoubtedly avoids the Reason-style hip-swiveling, I would strongly recommend this book.
Here's the author being interviewed by perennial Republican Pouncer [and former Reason contributor], Brendan O'Neill.
sweet. gracias.
whether Kim, Kris, or Caitlyn Jenner is the ultimate Kardashian when it comes to reinvention
The fuck? Anybody know who Leonardo Da Vinci's dad, or step dad is or was? Douglass'? Bow's?
Anybody name who Da Vinci fucked for stardom? Douglass? Bow?
I don't begrudge Kim for making money, but this "self-made" bullshit is every bit as disingenuous as saying Trump is a self-made man.
I guess Reason got paid to hock another book that has fuck all to do with libertarianism.
A Florentine lawyer, Ser Piero da Vinci
There's something fundamentally late-stage cosmopolitan bread and circuses about all this. The peasant, the slave and the plebian feel the boot of the empire on their neck to finance the constant spectacles, but the empire's favorites are free to identify as horses.
The drive for a self-selected identity seems a function of the the atomization of society and the dismissal of all identities organically established. I don't think people rooted in who they are feel a need to establish an identity. Of course, they also pose a challenge to shaping the polity to the empire's needs. It's better for the empire to establish complete rootlessness where who you are can be "re-invented" tomorrow, depending on the empire's needs of the moment and ability to incentivize that re-invention.
If you get the chance, check out the Furedi interview I linked above (or read the book). He does a great job of describing how this 'identity fluidity' in the modern era gives one a surface feeling of unfettered freedom, but it comes along with a highly constrained set of social norms prescribed by a kind of managerial/technocratic class.
>> don’t think people rooted in who they are feel a need to establish an identity.
word.
Ray-Jay on line 2. Vivid on line 3.
>>freedom we have to define our identities
freedom we have to poseur ... just be you, you know who you is
He is I and I am him, Slim with the tilted brim, *what's my muthafuckin' name?*
I have always held Brandy responsible for the fact that we even know who those girls are.
yes. and Bruce Jenner becomes a bajillionaire on the flipside too lol.
Disagree, O.J. Biological non-birthing parent was the 5th man on OJ Simpson’s “Dream Team”.
When you explain it to someone who didn’t live through it, like some anthropologist leafing through the historical record, it was clearly bastard birth of reality TV.
If OJ didn't murder Nicole, none of us would have any clue who the Kardashians or maybe even Paris Hilton is and, at best, the only glimpse we'd have into their lives would be whatever the modern, Web 2.0 instantiation of MTVs Cribs or Lifestyles Of The Rich And Famous would be.
If OJ didn’t murder Nicole
Sorry, if OJ weren't liable for Nicole's murder.
^^ interesting. also the glove didn't fit.