Greg Lukianoff: Saving the 'Culture of Free Speech'
The longtime head of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education announces a new name and expanded mission for FIRE.

In the late 1970s, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) famously—and controversially—defended the right of neo-Nazis to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie, Illinois, which was home to many Holocaust survivors. It was a defining moment for the group and for the idea that free speech, no matter how vile, must be guaranteed to everyone.
But over the past 20 years—and especially over the past few years—the ACLU has seemingly retreated from its unwavering defense of free speech in favor of supporting progressive candidates and causes. It ran ads supporting Stacey Abrams in her gubernatorial campaign in Georgia, for instance. It's called for the forgiveness of $50,000 in student loan debt. It even ghostwrote and placed the Washington Post op-ed about domestic violence that led to Amber Heard losing a defamation case against Johnny Depp.
Its lack of focus on its traditional mission of defending free speech has gotten to a point where its former executive director, who led the group during the Skokie controversy, has become one of its biggest critics. "If the Skokie case happened again," Ira Glasser told me in 2020, "would the ACLU take it? I don't know."
But if the ACLU is retreating, another free speech group is expanding to fill the void left behind. Founded in 1999 to combat speech codes on college campuses, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education—FIRE—has announced a new name and an expanded mission of defending free speech off-campus as well as on.
The new name is the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and the group has announced "a three-year, $75 million litigation, opinion research and public education campaign aimed at boosting and solidifying support for free-speech values." FIRE's longtime president is Greg Lukianoff, the co-author of the bestselling book The Coddling of the American Mind, and, as it happens, a former employee of the ACLU—a group for which he has lots of praise.
In today's episode, he tells me about why he's concerned that support for what he calls the "culture of free speech"—broad-based belief in the value of tolerance and civil disagreement—has been declining for the better part of a decade and how FIRE is going to work to turn that around.
Today's sponsor:
- Are you feeling burned out? BetterHelp is an accessible and affordable source for professional counseling. BetterHelp assesses your needs and matches you with a licensed therapist you can start talking to in under 24 hours, all online. As a Reason Interview listener, you'll get 10 percent off your first month by visiting our sponsor at BetterHelp.com/brain
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Sooo many holocaust survivors.
If you’re in a prison camp, targeted for extermination, how do you survive?
In this thread, Misek the stormfag demonstrates that he's never read a history book.
Get that Nazi scum to provide his "irrefutable evidence!!!"
Seems the Nazis never bragged about it in the intel intercepted by the Brits!
How about them apples?
The enigma decryption that helped the allies win the war where Germans supposedly talked in code about prison camp deaths and transfers but spoke plainly about their military plans.
Because the information in those decrypts contradicts the holocaust narrative.
Now those are some impressive feeble mental gymnastics.
Piss off, stormfag.
Were the Jews also behind faking Paul McCartney's death? Asking for a friend.
"...The enigma decryption that helped the allies win the war where Germans supposedly talked in code about prison camp deaths and transfers but spoke plainly about their military plans..."
Exactly; this is what that scumbag Nazi claims is "irrefutable evidence. What a fucking ignoramus. What a FUCKING IGNORAMUS!
Here, in public display, is the paucity of the Nazi shitbag's best claims; his "irrefutable evidence".
The intel which certainly did assist the allied victory somehow didn't include them bragging about mass murder. My goodness!
Now, anyone with a decent WWII library will see clearly that not one of the Nazis was willing to brag in any form which might be intercepted by the allies regarding the mass murder of the Jews. This was true up to and including the denials of same at Nuernberg, knowing full well that admitting same is pretty much admission of crimes against humanity.
And here we have our resident Nazi shitbag claiming that the non-admission of same is equal to the non-commission of same.
It is hard to believe that STUPID at this level allows a being to operate a keyboard.
Eat shit and die, asshole. Make your family proud.
The intel didn’t merely “ not brag”, it clearly and specifically contradicted the holocaust narrative.
In their top secret communications, why would Germans lie about prison camp information but share real military plans?
If their priority was extermination, why would they have let even one Jew live when they abandoned the prison camps long before the first allied troops showed up?
That is some irrefutable logic that eludes you. You are truly performing some impressive feeble mental gymnastics.
You survive by being rescued by the Allied army before you die, moron.
Rescued? No, found.
There was no battle at any prison camp.
Anyone left alive was left as such by the Germans.
They had plenty of unused bullets.
And the departure of the Germans had nothing to do with the approach of the Allied army? You're not making sense, as usual.
Hahaha
The Germans left them alone and when the allies showed up months later, they “rescued” them from who?
You have a bizarre idea of what leaving someone alone is.
Nazis had every opportunity to kill every last Jew when they abandoned the prison camps long before any allied troops showed up. They didn’t. They left them alone.
That demonstrates that they had no plans to exterminate Jews.
Do you feel fear when you recognize the truth? That’s your brainwashing trying to regain control.
Jews have always been hated around the world for their corrupt actions based on their religious commitment to lying.
Jews earned Germans hatred by hating Germans first.
In WW1 by using their global financial force to dupe the US who had just elected Wilson on an antiwar platform into entering WW1. They did this for the Balfour declaration promise to steal Palestine.
Then by using their financial force again in 1933 to coordinate global boycotts of all German trade to intentionally drive Germany into WW2. This because Germans had enough suffering from Jewish control of the treaty of Versailles and had democratically elected Hitler.
Jews realized their cabbalisistic number of 6 million deaths to steal Palestine and create their Zion in Israel alright. They caused the deaths of others in the real holocausts of WW1 and WW2.
No, I don't fear crazy people. I pity them.
http://www.thejc.com/news/news-features/100-years-since-versailles-anniversary-1.485822
You have my pity.
I dunno. Ask the ex-inmates of Sobibor, who resisted extermination starting with shop-made knives and hatchets, then used them to kill the guards and seize their Lugers and Mausers, then used those to seize the grease guns and machine gun turrets, then they lived up to their plan that no one would escape unless every inmate was in on the escape.
Without spoiling the ending, everybody did what the Hell they wanted for as long as they could get away with it. Results varied, of course, as they always do when people are free, but Sobibor was closed forever after this embarassment to the Aryan Pure Supermen and untold millions more lives were saved!
That's how those death camp inmates, and their thousands of descendants, survived.
Now have bad dreams over that and Fuck Off, Nazi!
“However, the plan was disrupted after only 11 of the SS officers had been killed. The prisoners had to escape by climbing over barbed wire fences and running through a mine field under heavy machine gun fire. About 300 prisoners made it out of the camp, of whom 58 are known to have survived the war.”
What, there were Jews that didn’t March willingly in line into gas chambers stinking with all kinds of human body fluids watching those ahead of them being carried out naked and dead?
Hopefully Greg Lukianoff will be less of an utter asshole than "Expert Christian Theologian" Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer... And NOT espouse the below!
Lusts-after-your-web-sites Marxist “Christian Theological Expert” MammaryBahnFuhrer thinks that one of the Ten Commandments reads as follows:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s. Unless thy neighbor art a corporatist in Thine Righteous Eyes, in which case, Thou shalt steal ALL of their stuff & shit, howsoever Thy Power-Hungry Right-Wing Wrong-Nut Marxist Heart may desire.
is it coveting if the wife is offered?
Beyond my expertise, sad to say... I would pass you on to "Hooker Hulk Hogan" for a MUCH better expert opinion!
See http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/18/florida-jury-awards-115-million-to-hulk# … About Hooker Hulk Hogan… “Hooker Hulk” gets $115 MILLION, v/s “Stormy Daniels” gets only $130 K, for each of them being skanky hos. The MALE skanky ho gets almost THREE orders of magnitude more money!!! How is THAT for sexual equality?!
But what gets my bowels in an uproar even more, is that through the courts and policemen enforcing court orders and/or contracts here in these kinds of cases, Government Almighty is the Pimp Daddy and hit-man enforcer of it all! And then they go and jail $50 and $100 poor hookers, to “protect us from trafficking in sex slaves”.
If Government Almighty is going to be the Big Pimp Daddy and hit-man enforcer, for the rich and famous, then could they PLEASE stop being hypocrites, and stop punishing the “little people” for doing the same things!??!
SIDE-BAND SNIDE COMMENT:
As a socio-economic and sexual-political experiment, I think someone should get Hooker Hulk Hogan to fuck Stormy Daniels. Which of the two would owe how much money, to the other?
MAIN COMMENT:
I think I have fingured out WHY does Government Almighty play Big Pimp Daddy to the rich and famous, while punishing the dirt-poor hookers?! When $130 k or $115 million gets thrown around, Government Almighty gets to tax the payment and the lawyers, and grab at least 1/3 of it. Easy-peasy on the big transactions… When a small-time hooker turns a trick “under the table” (a kinky place to do it!), it is MUCH harder to collect! Especially if he or she is paid in smack or crack or Ripple wine…
I am UTTERLY crushed to have fingered out that Government Almighty (which claims to LOVE me and want to PROTECT me from sleazy sex), is actually just wanting to line its own wallet!!!
>>Hooker Hulk Hogan to fuck Stormy Daniels
too much blonde hair for my tv ... rods and cones!
Two Nazis, Miᛋᛋek and ᛋᛋqrlsy, show up to shitpost and troll this thread to oblivion.
Some guys really, really hate free speech.
You NAZI too! AND icky-poo! Nanny-nanny boo-boo!
(It's not very hard to elevate the level of the discourse around here, after a Mammary-Necrophilia-ID-Thief-Pusher-of-Suicide-in-the-Holy-Name-of-Jesus post.)
Whatever happened to "never go full retard"?
Referring only to my response to invoking Godwin’s law, you’re calling facts that you can’t refute, shitposting.
Obviously you do hate free speech.
Don't worry about it. "Coveting," along with "Taking no other Gods," "Taking The Lord thy God's Name in vain," and "Rmembering The Sabbath day to keep holy" are all Thoughtcrimes, Along with The Original Thoughtcrime of seeking knowledge of Good and Evil.
Now merely wanting the wife and partaking are two different animals.
Partaking without the other spouse's knowledge and consent is adultery and a civil wrong.
Partaking without the wife's consent is rape, which, incidentally, while outlawed in Modernity, was never outlawed in the Bible or The Top Ten.
But partaking of the wife with everyone's knowledge and consent...Saaaay!
You go, Boy! 🙂
Given your handle, one might think you'd notice that you'd elevated your foaming at the mouth bias dislike of other peoples' beliefs -religion in this case to the point of it being quasi-religious. Then, one might also have noticed that your handle is a misnomer. Religious folks surely are capable of fucking up plenty of things, but the fact of the matter is that it isn't the religion that is the issue, it is people.
But over the past 20 years—and especially over the past few years—the ACLU has
seeminglyretreated from its unwavering defense of free speechFTFY
they'd take up the case *against* the nazis this time.
They ARE the Nazis, this time.
Would they defend Jews, though? I expect they'd just sit the next one out.
Only "good" Jews.
Hell, 50 years. Skokie occurred before I was born and I'm decidedly middle aged currently.
...and, honestly, if there was a snowball's chance in hell of Nazi beliefs being accepted by the mainstream, they would not have protected them.
The last two years haven't shown you how mainstream authoritarianism is now?
The "culture of free speech" is dead. Americans despise free speech now. Decades of commie public school instruction raising snowflakes has resulted in a culture of safe spaces and "silence is violence".
No, SOME Americans despise free speech. Yes, they're the dominant political faction and control all our institutions. But fuck you're running cover for that fact by blaming all Americans.
The internet exists. Speech has never been more free. Or cheap.
Fuck off, you lying piece of shit.
Facebook blocked one billion people from sharing British Medical Journal articles because their moron "fact-checkers" thought that it was contradicting Democratic Party narrative on Covid.
Twitter did the same thing to the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association and the Oxford virologists who worked on the Oxford-AstraZeneca covid vaccine.
And that's just nonpolitical stuff. Not even the throws of McCarthyism matched the censorship surrounding the last election.
I'm really impressed with FIRE. I started giving to them several years ago, when I realized I couldn't in good conscience support the ACLU anymore.
The Canadian version, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) is still doing good work though.
“Warrantless Domestic Spying” (covert surveillance) is the greatest threat to the First Amendment. Essentially Cointelpro-style tactics by both government and private organizations punishing or silencing legal speech covertly.
The Framers of the Constitution essentially knew that citizen speech many times conflicts with big business lobbyists. Your free speech can many times affect corporate profits.
Since the First Amendment gives citizens a legal right to speak, associate, worship and the free press - government and corporate censors can only respond covertly. The goal is not to arrest you but defame you or destroy your employment.
One cannot understand what the First Amendment really means until you understand Cointelpro tactics like the covert punishments dished out to Christian minister Martin Luther King, Jr. (uncovered by Senator Frank Church’s “Church Committee”).
The danger is in the “covert” activities and corporations may be the ones to police the most!
How did a piece on civil liberties slip into reasonmag? Pleather jacket took time off from navel-gazing and dreaming up 'think-pieces' on the libertarian bona fides of some new pop culture dreck long enough to look around? More like this, please.