John McWhorter: How To Defeat 'Woke Racism'
The New York Times columnist and Columbia University linguist on the "new religion" he says has "betrayed Black America."

In his bestselling new book, Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America, New York Times columnist and Columbia University linguist John McWhorter argues that the ideas of Robin DiAngelo, Ibram X. Kendi, and The 1619 Project undermine blacks by sharpening racial divides and distracting from actual obstacles to real progress.
Nick Gillespie spoke with the 56-year-old McWhorter about what white people get out of cooperating with an ideological agenda that casts them as devils, what black people gain by "performing" victimhood, and what needs to change so that all Americans can get on with creating a more perfect union.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Controlled opposition
Nah, that doesn't mean what you think it does. Missed the mark.
McWhorter is absolutely controlled opposition
Step 1: don’t let a milksop like: https://reason.com/people/nick-gillespie
Write articles
>>Nick Gillespie spoke with the 56-year-old McWhorter about what white people get out of cooperating with an ideological agenda
did Nick Gillespie start by asking McWhorter to define white people?
How to defeat woke racism? Call it out for the bullshit that it is. That’s how.
Yeah. Call a spade a spade.
Or... wait, is that phrase racist now?
Not bad. McWhorter reiterates what everyone who doesn't work for the Times or Twitter, thinks. The hook that makes him exceptional is that he works for the Times.
Mc-who?
rter
To clarify, those tweets you hate on Twitter do not come from people who work for Twitter. Twitter is just the media, the twits who post there work (or don't work) elsewhere.
Woke racism started in academia and the media. It was mostly pushed for decades (called all sorts of things) by marxists who have "old world grudges" with Americans of European background who are not like them. Irish, Italian, Greek, German and so on have always been viewed suspiciously by Russian and Eastern European Communists and Socialists who immigrated to America and then started to have influence in academia and the media.
The truth, reality demonstrated by the evidence of logic and science is the only thing shared by everyone in peace.
Anything else is corruption.
Lies are easily refuted. Truth can never be.
I have the peace of mind that comes from knowing my words have never been refuted.
Liars are tormented by the fact that they can neither prove what they claim nor refute what they deny.
Holocaust denier.
Holocaust liar.
Stop prioritizing race, and criticize anyone who does.
Great interview. One of the things I'm sorry that wasn't addressed more than momentarily is how destructive aggressive racial activism has been to the lives of Black people and the cities where they live. I'm a couple of years older than McWhorter, and I'm feeling like I'm seeing a re-run of the urban destruction of my childhood. Aggrieved, violent activists? Check. Riots and looting? Check. Rapidly increasing urban crime rates? Soft-on crime DAs? Empty offices and storefronts? Check, check, check.
Central city business districts were already under threat from online sales and remote work (further amplified by the pandemic), and the rampant lawlessness feels like the coup-de-grace. What's more likely -- that Chicago's 'Magnificent Mile' returns to its recent glory in a few years? Or that the closing of flagship stores there (which has already happened) will ultimately result in the area going the way Detroit's Woodward Ave district after the closing of J. L. Hudson's (once the second-largest department store in the world)? Current signs in Chicago aren't good.
McWhorters's 'three things' are fine, except that even in the very unlike case that they are implemented, you're still talking about very long term plans. There's no way they're going to do anything to address immediate needs.
For sure the race card has been overplayed so many times that it serves primarily to make many (most?) people yawn or grimmace and move on to another topic. It must a good fund raiser tactic for radicals though - it has paid off well for the BLM elites.