How Afghanistan Became the First 'Feminist' War
Rafia Zakaria's controversial Against White Feminism challenges the status of icons like Simone de Beauvoir, Betty Friedan, and Eve Ensler.

Because of the war on terror, argues Rafia Zakaria, American feminism has been recast from a "movement that existed in opposition to the state, as a critique of its institutions and mores…[to] one that serve[s] the state's interests through any means imaginable." Nothing exemplifies this tragic turn better, she says, than the Oscar-winning movie Zero Dark Thirty, in which the female lead (played by Jessica Chastain) is exalted as a torturer who can more than keep up with her male colleagues when it comes to breaking the bodies of real and suspected terrorists.
In Against White Feminism, Zakaria makes the case that Western feminism has been mostly interested in achieving equality between white women and white men, often at the expense of black and brown people. After the 9/11 attacks, for instance, this led many feminist organizations to support the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and to push for top-down aid programs that didn't take into account what Afghan women actually wanted or needed.
It's a provocative book that critiques feminists from Simone de Beauvoir to Betty Friedan to Eve Ensler and forces a reevaluation of how best to empower all women around the globe, who are often struggling against sexism that is deeply entwined with state power.
Born in Pakistan and now living in the United States, Zakaria is the author of The Upstairs Wife and writes at Rafia (Unedited) on Substack. In 2017, Nick Gillespie interviewed her about her book Veil for Reason. Listen to that here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How brave, using "white" as a pejorative.
I learned in college using "white" as an insult is totally fine.
But don't you DARE use "Jewish" the same way.
Space Jews is fine though.
I'm still waiting for History of the World Part II to come out.
Are they zooming around defending the Hebrew race?
OJ Simpson, not a Jew.
But guess who is....Hall of Famer Rod Carew (he converted)
"white males" does not include Jews..didn't you learn that at Brown in critical race theory?
It's especially brave when a more accurate descriptor would be upper class feminism or even just feminism.
By giving the verbal smackdown to whites, you can insulate yourself against leftist criticism, or at least put your leftist critics on the defensive as figure out ways to prove they hate whites as much as anyone.
To be fair to the author, feminism in America has always been upper middle class and white. And it's especially so now.
Victorian fainting couch feminism, as Camille Paglia calls it.
"fainting couch"
...or the princess and the pea?
Make me a sammich
Hee hee hee hee hee, your wish is my command!
https://spongebob.fandom.com/wiki/Sand_witch
If I can find a bread big enough for you to crawl into, OK.
You’ll need one of those footlong rolls.
+1 bachelor party.
again there's a joke in here about if that chick in the photo would just drop 15lb off those hips but I'm not going to make it
"It's a provocative book that critiques feminists from Simone de Beauvoir to Betty Friedan to Eve Ensler"
Ugh, Eve Ensler is just terrible. How is "The Vagina Monologues" an appropriate name for a supposedly feminist play? It's super transphobic. Women with ladydicks are just as feminine as women with vaginas.
#AgainstTERFs
OBL brings the high heat once again.
Recast from a national case of penis envy to a national case of the vapors.
What we need is a national program to provide pearls for clutching.
Feminism is the radical notion that men and women are equal.
*checks notes*
Strike that last statement, we're reevaluating.
I would strongly recommend Helen Pluckrose's excellent book Cynical Theories, esp the sections on Gender theory and feminism if you want a deep dive into this.
All women are created equal, but trans-women are more equal than others.
As Sahar Khan said in a recent CATO podcast, the US talked about Afghan womens rights before invading, talked about Afghan womens rights after leaving, but never once talked about Aghan womens rights during the occupation.
The White Patriarchy in charge of foreign policy played feminists for fools, and the feminists were more than happy to be played. All in the interest of the overarching state. White Women in combat was far more important a symbol than brown Afghan females.
No one better exemplifies the concept of "White Man's Burden" than White Womyn.
Because of the war on terror, argues Rafia Zakaria, American feminism has been recast from a "movement that existed in opposition to the state, as a critique of its institutions and mores…[to] one that serve[s] the state's interests through any means imaginable."
Haha, are you fucking kidding me? Feminism has NEVER been in opposition to the state as a general principle--its purpose has ALWAYS been to co-opt and transform the state to serve their own political interests. It's not an accident at all that feminists positively consider their worldview to be akin to a deadly virus.
Thank you, sir, for anticipating my immediate reaction to reading that opening sentence. Saying that feminism was ever opposed to state power is like saying that Donald Trump is a lifelong opponent of eminent domain.
A woman who throws "white supremacy" and "The Patriarchy" around this freely deserves the pimp hand, not the slobbery knob polishing you went for, Gillespie.
Oh, I get it. You couldn't disagree because "she's a girl", amirite?
I don't think this is even worthwhile. When she refers to her "research", you f'ing KNOW she means "searching through certified woke sources for material confirming the point I intend to make". Why bother with this shit?
Nick was all out of other material.
Gillespie marinated in the type of philosophy she is espousing. I do not think he opposes the basic assumptions.
Born in Pakistan and now living in the United States, Zakaria is the author of The Upstairs Wife and writes at Rafia (Unedited) on Substack. In 2017, Nick Gillespie interviewed her about her book Veil for Reason. Listen to that here.
I always get a laugh at people who have moved to the United States, want to keep living in the United States, and yet seem to hate nothing more than the United States and roleplay as if wherever they clearly have no interest in living is so much better than the United States. If Zakaria feels that US feminism has been insufficiently beneficial to Pakistani women she's welcome to check out the state of Pakistani feminism. Last I checked they were still stoning women to death.
I'm not saying the US is perfect. You can certainly make some sort of argument that white women have it better than women but the improvements that western feminists have brought to their own lives weren't done at the expense of non-whites. Zakaria just sounds like a garden variety bigot and people shouldn't give the time of day to that kind of racist nonsense.
Howz that for rewriting history.
Do we invade all countries whose culture we disagree with, or just the smaller more helpless ones?
Let’s see, Russia, North Korea, China okay I’ve got it.
Get this, a French intellectual in the 40's like Simone de Beauvoir was a French cultural chauvinist, and Zakaria finds this offensive. I mean de Beauvoir had some pretty loathsome views, but I am not sure these are the most important.
Though her point that Western feminists are doing moral porn lording it over the Third World peons.
Simone de Beauvoir?
Would
Maybe, but at some point, you would have to talk to her.
The story about the stoves is interesting, as the local women preferred gathering firewood for their cookstoves than doing construction work breaking rocks in 100 degree heat. The conceit that women are prevented from doing men's work rather than it not being attractive to them. That is, women do not want to live the way feminists want them to live.
Apparently, a white feminist in Pakistan will be treated with great deference because Pakistanis are culturally submissive to white people because colonialism. She makes some goods points but it is wrapped up in this crazy racialist thinking.
Pakistanis are of the Caucasian persuasion.
That may be true, but not in Zakaria's mind.
"black and brown people." Please don't use this hip, woke, progressive, meaningless phrase. There is no "homogeneity" among people who happen to be colored black (very few on Earth) or brown (almost everyone on Earth, of one shade or another). If you think in terms of "black and brown people" you're already on the wrong road about how to think about humans.
Well, I didn't mean to put homogeneity in quotes. Nevertheless, there is no homogeneity whether I put it in "quotes" or not.
I know. And how is fighting Islamofascist terrorism a war against so-called "black and brown people," when Islam is a religion and not a color or "race?"
My two moms apparently did not win over the hearts and minds of people in Afghanistan. Pushing wokeness didn't work very well did it? Reminds me of an article I read from decades ago where Russian women in the old USSR envied their US counterparts..they could stay home and raise their kids (not have to send to govt day care), enjoyed the luxuries like a fridge, TV, and large homes where they could raise their kids. Just saying..US post modern structure maybe isn't what other people want including women.
darn helping some people and not others. so bad, so bad.
First war?
I guess the annual murder of 750,000 helpless innocent unborn babies since 1973 is technically a genocide.
Just so she leaves Gloria Steinem alone….