Jesse Singal: Why We Keep Falling for Psychological Quick Fixes
From "power poses" to the self-esteem movement to implicit bias tests, Americans are suckers for bad ideas from psychologists.

Do you remember the "power pose" craze from about a decade ago? In the second-most popular TED talk ever, psychologist Amy Cuddy has told over 60 million viewers that they can change their lives by simply changing their body language.
If you grew up in the 1990s, you probably experienced classes devoted to boosting your self-esteem, independent of your actual achievements on tests or assignments.
Have you taken the Implicit Association Test or IAT, which claims to test your unconscious bias against minorities and other groups? It is routinely used in all sorts of diversity training programs and educational settings, from K-12 through college.
These are all examples of what science writer and podcaster Jesse Singal calls "quick fixes" that attempt to address pressing social issues based on fundamentally flawed research. In The Quick Fix: Why Fad Psychology Can't Cure Our Social Ills, Singal looks at these and other attempts to change social policy based on bad or faulty science.
One of Cuddy's fellow researchers has said that their research doesn't prove anything in the real world. The K-12 curriculum that started the self-esteem boom was based on a misreading of Nathaniel Branden's work by a single powerful California politician. And the IAT is not only unreliable—the same individual will generate very different scores when they retake the test—it's not clear that "unconscious bias" is a major influence on how we act toward one another.
Singal, co-host of the popular podcast Blocked & Reported, tells Nick Gillespie his goal is to explain why we keep falling for ideas that psychologists say will fix society. He hopes that we'll waste less time focusing on things that don't really help anyone.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Colorado Springs VA has a Tranny Psych Doc. No expense spared when it comes to the mental health of veterans.
Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its bghearnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
on this page…. Visit Here
I don't see why that would impact their ability to practice medicine. Even if you (wrongly) accepted that transgenderism is a mental illness, a doctor who suffers from an illness themselves can still treat illnesses. If an oncologist finds a tumor on themselves that doesn't make them suddenly incompetent at oncology.
Actually providing good care for veterans means hiring qualified medical professionals. If you really cared about veterans you wouldn't refuse to hire someone qualified to treat them for an epically stupid reason like their gender identity.
These are all examples of what science writer and podcaster Jesse Singal calls "quick fixes" that attempt to address pressing social issues based on fundamentally flawed research.
Nowadays we call them "mind hacks" or "hacking your brain, bro".
And yeah, TED Talks always seem to have someone who thinks they can hack society through some kind of neuro-sciency babble.
PT Barnum enters the chat.
In his next life, PT Barnum became a leader in Scientology!
"Neuroscience" is pure pseudoscience. Oh they try to glom on to some actual science to shove under the umbrella but it's essentially a field of fraud, fabulism and quackery with a disproportionate representation of mass murderers like Holmes and that lady who shot up her tenure committee at University of Alabama, Huntsville.
Its the result of adopting Keynsian Economics in culture...you don't have to save, wait, listen, not jump to conclusions but just have instant gratifiction...it isn't suprising that the 19th century and even 20th up to the 60's had a populace which valued critical thinking and "emotion."
This is ALSO what led to trumpanzees gone apeshit, trying to replace democracy with mobocracy! You don't like it? Don't bother to wait 4 years, learn your hard-earned lessons, and elect a candidate (at the primary) with better moral character... Just throw yourself a hissy fit, make up lies, and get what you want, NOW!!!
Hey they say you eat shit, by your own admission.
I don't know if you actually do, but it seems likely based on what you continually regurgitate hereabouts.
Shit in, shit out, amIright?
Typical conservaturd numb-skull, can't refute what I write, so it resorts to empty-headed insults... What a surprise!
Here, refute the below, conservaturd numb-skull!
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/11/trumps-big-lie-and-hitlers-is-this-how-americas-slide-into-totalitarianism-begins/
Trump’s Big Lie and Hitler’s: Is this how America’s slide into totalitarianism begins?
Oh but I know… Anything that disagrees with the echo chamber is “Marxist”, right? No matter HOW factual it might be!
Totalitarians want to turn GOP into GOD (Grand Old Dictatorshit).
It is against my personal policy to engage with trolls and persons suffering from manic depressive illness [ok, please just spare me "Tim the Enchanter" analogy]; this includes anything from Salon, Slate, Vox, Mother Jones, and HuffPo. Assuming they are still in publication.
If you look up "echo chamber" in many places, the definition is set to "Quo Usque Tandem"... Please do NOT tell me FACTS that I don't want to hear!
Diagnosing all democrats as malignant narcissists and higher on the sociopath scale would be a good start for all these psychologists.
BREAKING - Senate's introducing legislation to expand the USSC. Last one to leave the country, turn out the lights.
Let's see how the vote shakes out, first. Really surprised they didn't start on this front by trying to split a few leviathan Federal Circuits first. It's needed to happen for awhile, and only legal geeks would get bent by Biden starting out with it. Packing SCOTUS, OTOH, gives away the game early.
Of course, perhaps deception isn't required by Team Globohomo anymore.
I did say they were going to try and pack it. I thought they'd have shitcanned the filibuster first though.
It all hinges on Manchin and Sinema now.
Guess we'll see. I wouldn't have thought they'd have introduced a bill this inflammatory, if they didn't think it would pass.
Though perhaps having it publicly stuck out in the open, and acquiring all sorts of incendiary publicity---which actually might cause "some people to do something "----is the point.
Defcon 1
Not before we cap some collaborators.
If it didn't happen after a Presidential election was blatantly stolen, why do you think it would happen after this? It's not like adding onto the Court won't be found perfectly legal.
H. L. Mencken got it right. “For every complex problem there is a simple solution, and it is wrong.”
it's not clear that "unconscious bias" is a major influence on how we act toward one another.
"Well, if it were clear it wouldn't be *unconscious*, DUH!"
It's not clear that my conscious bias against women's clothing is a major influence on how women dress around me.
IAT is obvious quackery. The only reason it isn't universally mocked is because it delivers the results left wingers want. Sadly this is their only criteria for believing anything.
Yeah, the IAT has been so thoroughly debunked that the authors of the IAT finally withdrew their claims that it could detect and predict racism in 2015, three years before the publication of White Fragility, which leans almost entirely on the IAT for the credibility of its argument. Disregard anyone who derives any portion of their argument from the idea of unconscious bias. It's rank pseudoscience.
Jesse Singal is woke adjacent.
Correct
Just like Reason
I like the dyke he podcasts with. She's funny and smart.
He is a joke, with no substance and mostly left wing talking points.
He was on a podcast opposite James Lyndsay talking about election stuff, and he is pretty much a lefty little simp, Lyndsay absolutely steam rolled him and he never had any good comebacks other than garden variety crap you would hear if you turned on CNN.
It actually adds to his book's credibility a little. If woke social psychology fads are so stupid that even a woke-adjacent person is calling them out, they must be truly, colossally idiotic.
No actual people don't go for this crap. They live their lives
Guess we’re waiting till tomorrow for the Supreme Court packing story? The libertarian moment is coming long and hard! But not a single mean tweet in sight.
I wonder if Reason writers have even considered what the court that protects 1A being a political wing of the DNC would do to this publication? Then again it appears Koch’s made his deal with Soros, so the correct ones will have jobs.
They agreed to not get eaten first. It's their own fault for not reading the fine print more closely.
I hear that the mollycoddled, equalized, impotent, leftist misfits learn most of their skills in a monkey see, monkey do fashion these days. They are also said to be clingers for the colorblind, inapt stutter excreted by their stockmen on social media.
Every day in every way I am getting better and better!
Name that move--Barcelona!
"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it! People like me!"
Psychology isn't really a science, at least not by the standards of chemistry, physics, and medicine. Almost one half of all major breakthrough psychology studies can't be reproduced.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/08/28/landmark-study-suggests-most-psychology-studies-dont-yield-reproducible-results
Same is true for medicine. Most of those studies a completely wrong.
Dr. Ioannidis, a nation turns its lonely eyes to you. His infamous paper on the subject:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915619/
Outside the "science" world of blabber we call that commie-indoctrination camps.
Is this supposed to be a hard question? You might as well ask why people fall for easy weight-reduction diets designed to not leave one feel deprived. Or why cosmetics are popular.
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0273772392/reasonmagazinea-20/
Psychobabble: Exploding the Myths of the Self-Help Generation 1st Edition ... Published 2012...
I swear there was a ??? 1970s, early 1980s or so, book with "Psychobabble" in the title, that I read too long ago...
This is NOT an old story here, folks! Nothing new under the sun!
Now on the other hand, I do believe that Jesus H. Christ was an astute psychologist! Leaving the beyond-the-beyond entirely out of it, he was STILL an astute psychologist!
http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/
Millions of people have used these simple tricks to stop falling for psychological quick-fixes! No. 7 will astound you!
Is this that "One Weird Trick" I keep seeing on my ad feed? The one that makes you lose weight, lose wrinkles, and get a bigger erection?
The K-12 curriculum that started the self-esteem boom was based on a misreading of Nathaniel Branden's work by a single powerful California politician.
So was Nathaniel Branden too busy with his harem to stand up and say: "You've got this all wrong!"