How To Crush 'the Tyranny of Metrics'
Historian Jerry Z. Muller says we waste too much time fixating on measurements that lead us astray.

When you woke up today, did you weigh yourself? At work, did you check any performance measures for yourself or your colleagues? When you got home, did you check your kids' grades on ProgressBook or some other form of online tracking service? Did you get your 10,000 steps in today, or are you waving your arms on the couch right now, trying to goose your daily total before turning in for the night?
We live in an intensely and increasingly measured world. Virtually everything we do yields data, numbers, and information that we think will improve our performance, help us hit target goals, or figure out if we're doing things right. Even just a few decades ago, this would have struck most of us as nuts, but now we take it for granted—at home, at work, at play.
In The Tyranny of Metrics, just out in paperback from Princeton University Press, historian Jerry Z. Muller explains how we got to a place where we're constantly measuring everything we do—and why much of the time we're not just wasting our time but making things objectively worse. While acknowledging that "the attempt to measure performance is…intrinsically desirable," he nonetheless contends that most metrics we use exemplify what Friedrich Hayek disdained as "scientism" or a "pretense to knowledge" that is false and misguided.
In chapters examining the use of numbers in education, policing, banking and finance, war, and other areas, Muller demonstrates how what he calls "metric fixation" often goads us into bad, counterproductive behavior. For instance, when surgeons were forced to participate in mandatory public "scorecards" that charted their patients' outcomes, Muller writes, doctors responded by refusing to treat the highest-risk people. "Anything that can be measured and rewarded will be gamed. We will see many variations on this theme."
Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes.
Audio production by Ian Keyser.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Go with FEELZ!
What could possibly go wrong?
Exactly. Those pesky facts are getting in the way of my feelings.
Go with FEELZ!
What could possibly go wrong?
If only missing the point were a sport - you would be world champion.
Where is your mom with that Pepsi?
I know it's all you wanted, but she just wouldn't give it to you.
Hmm. I rate this an 8.
6.5 from the East German judge - - - -
And the answer is 'don't measure anything'? Or the more nuanced 'figure out how to measure the right things'?
If the author is any good, the answer is the latter. It's hard work but essential. On the other hand, if the author actually said that, the book will be a sleeper that won't get read and won't earn him royalties. And that's a metric that matters to authors.
Yep-- "figure out how to measure the right things" is clearly the answer.
Unfortunately, that answer requires rational thought, some level of numeracy, and more than a little bit of effort.
So 95% of the population is doomed anyway.
That's been covered.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C-a64OwOYqU
If humans can measure something, they want to change that something. It's human nature.
-A cycling-crazed Economist
Transcript, please.
+text
I agree some things are over measured... But metrics are also SUPER important for making decisions. IMO well thought out metrics are probably what should be driving most decision making, because logic beats feelz every time. I am math brained though sooo...
One thing I find ridiculous is how some strict libertarians sometimes refuse to look at AVERAGES on some issues, because it doesn't take into account the individual man! So what? When one is discussing issues that involve millions of people, averages are what you need to look at, because it's the only thing to look at. If you're talking to an individual face to face you take them as an individual. It's not that hard.
Anyway, such things can help one realize where problems really lie, how to address them if they even can be addressed etc.
Knowing how to read the metrics is important too. Picking and choosing data and portraying it in a certain limited way can change the impression one gets. This is where most of the political gamesmanship really comes from.
But metrics are also SUPER important for making decisions. IMO well thought out metrics are probably what should be driving most decision making,
Fucking HARD PASS. Metrics based management is how corporate America is filled with spineless ass-kissers with zero vision or passion who can't make a decision to save their lives. It's a guarantee that the most incompetent people never get fired since 'the metrics said this was the best decision'.
Steve Jobs was literally the opposite of this - " 'Give the customers what they want.' But that's not my approach. Our job is to figure out what they're going to want before they do. I think Henry Ford once said, 'If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, "A faster horse!"' People don't know what they want until you show it to them. That's why I never rely on market research. Our task is to read things that are not yet on the page."
Metrics aren't the whole game... But if you don't know how many widgets a factory is producing, or that factory A is somehow producing 30% more widgets with the same equipment etc you're going to miss a lot of stuff.
You can't go JUST off of numbers, but you should really have the numbers too.
Numbers would help in the surgeon example, if they segregate the high risk patients and then look at those outcomes together to figure out how to handle high risk better.
But I agree measuring steps can be pretty stupid
True story.
After riding Space Mountain at Disney World, the step tracker my wife was wearing had added 1,232 steps.
If you are going to measure stuff, at least use accurate devices.
The lines are getting that much longer?
Historian Jerry Z. Muller says we waste too much time fixating on measurements that lead us astray.
... 😉
Nick signs off with "Rate and review us" with no sense of irony.
2/10 needs more sex appeal.
I wish I understood that.
Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to https://www.mcmbackpackonsale.com/mcm-medium-stark-victory-patch-visetos-backpack-in-brown.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.
Thanks for sharing this article! So many debates and rumors are running out there regarding the tyranny of metrics. I am a student of the law department, I got some points after reading an article on the constitution guard against tyranny at https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/how-does-the-constitution-guard-against-tyranny/ and I also like their other writing samples on different topics. By the way, there should be something by which we could measure performance but it should be the easiest way, not just like it seems as tyranny!