The Secret Cyberwar is Here: Director Alex Gibney on 'Zero Days', Stuxnet, and the Future of Cyberweapons
"The potential for enormous destruction and loss of life is palpable when it comes to cyberweapons," says Alex Gibney, director of the new film Zero Days, which delves into the creation, deployment, and implications of the Stuxnet virus. Stuxnet, a self-replicating cyberweapon launched by the U.S. and Israel into the Natanz nuclear plant in Iran, was an effort to thwart Iran's nuclear progress by taking control of the plant's centrifuges, spinning them until they would explode. "The reason it is hugely significant is it is the first time a computer code has crossed the threshold from the realm of cyber to the realm of the physical. So it is blowing stuff up."
"It was a brilliant and elegant weapon which achieved a goal of slowing down Iran's path to being a nuclear power. However, as a precedent, it was extremely dangerous because it was an attack on critical infrastructure during peacetime. Had that been done to us we would have been within our rights to start a war."
While Zero Days unfolds as a detective story, following the cybersecurity experts at Symantec who discovered the Stuxnet virus, a good portion of the film portrays the continued secrecy of cyberwarfare, something Gibney finds both frustrating and dangerous.
"We know that Stuxnet was launched by Israel and the United States against Iran. The United States won't admit that. Israel won't admit that," says Gibney. "We have a situation now where the weapons have gone way beyond Stuxnet in terms of their sophistication and their destructive power. Yet by keeping that offensive cyber-capability secret we deprive everybody in this country–in a democracy–from having any kind of debate over how and when and why they should be used. So the secrecy is actually putting us in existential risk in this case."
Gibney sat down with Reason TV to discuss the film, whether cyber-weapons are analogous to nuclear weapons, and whether he considers himself a "conspiracy factualist."
Approximately 10:30 minutes. Produced and edited by Meredith Bragg. Cameras by Todd Krainin and Austin Bragg.
Read Kurt Loder's review of Zero Days here.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
@6:05, there's something deliciously sinister about that accent.
Definitely more delectably sardonic than wonderfully squeaky.
I'm making over $15k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is what I do_________ http://www.trends88.com
Secrecy, sadly is now a household concern. I work in an industry that manufactures truck parts-- light and trim products. Yet the amount of time we spend concerning ourselves with security- and not just avoiding the destructive effects of internet viruses, but 'eyes-only' attitudes towards corporate products and designs would stun the enterprises of 20 years ago if you traveled back in time.
We act like there are spies and spooks hiding behind every blade of grass, waiting to steal our secrets and it becomes exhausting to do business.
I used to work in a top-secret facility back in the 80s, and I'm shocked and annoyed at how similarly we behave in a mundane industry where we make marker lights for commercial trucks.
China
Corporate spies stole porcelain technology, noodle-making and silk worm farming from the Chinese.
Damn straight. Dirty Chineses keepin' all that tech to themselves.
Really, we had it coming.
One of my favorite parts of Charles Mann's 1493 relates how Spanish artisans created a knockoff Chinese ceramic industry in Mexico to meet the European demand for porcelain. A letter exists from the viceroy of Mexico to the Spanish king, nearly 500 years ago, complaining about how Chinese immigrants were coming over on the Manila galleons and making even cheaper knockoffs of the Spanish knockoffs of Chinese vases, putting the Spanish counterfeiters out of business.
I remember that issue of Cimarronin.
Or how the Spaniards killed off the Incan metullargists before they could learn their silversmithing technique: a technology now lost forever. Cool book.
When there is, in the world, a nation that practically has theft as its number-one industry, while simultaneously being one o the top markets in the world, oddities and distortions will occur.
I will say though, there hasn't been a true market-disruptor technology (along the lines of the IC Engine, microprocessor, or Internet) in quite a while. As such, because all that's happening is refining what exists and putting it together in new ways, companies are being more paranoid, since a breach can much more easily mean that your design is knocked off before it even gets to market.
Has anyone heard this rumor about Trump choosing his daughter as his running mate, leading to what might be the greatest political bumper sticker of all time?
I have not heard it. It sounds too too over the top to be true...even for Trump
What, better than "Clinton/Clinton 2016?"
RE: The Secret Cyberwar is Here: Director Alex Gibney on 'Zero Days', Stuxnet, and the Future of Cyberweapons
This is obviously a doubter who dares question the motives of The State.
Such people should not be allowed to give their opinions, be placed into their local gulag and be dealt with accordingly by The State.
Such comments emits a foul odor of distrust to our obvious betters in power.
We should always trust those ruling over us because they always have our best interest at hearts, would never do anything that violate the standards set forth by our Founding Fathers or commit illegal acts in order to ingratiate their positions of power or privileges at our the untermenschen's expense.
One can only speculate where Mr. Gibney gets his strange ideas of The State using their power to further enslave us.
Eeehhhh, maybe until their bearings failed, or until the radial stresses incurred by their rotors exceeded their design strength, but "explode?" Not really.
Actually - neither.
When the centrifuges are spun up there's a critical speed range they have to get through fast as they resonate during this period and resonating long enough will make them 'catastrophically fail'.
Its getting them through that critical speed range (either in spin up or spin down) that is the problem. Hold the centrifuges in that speed range for long enough (and I don't know how long 'long enough is' but you could falsify speed data so the operators weren't aware of the danger - though I don't know if there might be other warnings, like weird sounds and whatnot.) and they'll start popping.
Too fast and they will resonate and break. Too slow and they wobble (like a top or spun beer bottle) and break. There were a number of stuxnet varients that did different things. By previously recording the correct data they were able to play back what appears to be a healthy centrifuge to the scada monitoring equipment. However, there would be noise if you were in the room when one was spun above rated speed.
"...Yet by keeping that offensive cyber-capability secret we deprive everybody in this country?in a democracy?from having any kind of debate over how and when and why they should be used...."
If anyone actually believes that this is a democracy, they're not paying attention. Yes, we are allowed to vote - for whoever our rulers decide we can vote for. It's an oligarchy skinned with "democratic" rituals whose outcomes are decided by the "elite".
I watched this last night.
First, though it is not "based" on the book Countdown to Zero Day" as the material is real life, the substance is similar. The book I think is way better for understanding the finding, reverse engineering and analysis of stuxnet/og. Only towards the end did the book delve into the political/moral/unintended consequences of the whole program - it was far more techno spy thriller to me than this movie.
The movie, however, focused quite a bit more on the players involved and the political side of things, again with some talk throughout of how this has already drastically changed the future of war. I would have liked to see a bit more on the stuxnet implementation but can understand why they trimmed it for a general but interested audience. The coverage of 8200 brigade's involvement was good and shows clearly why the US should a) not trust Israel and b) stop the fiction that they are our best friends.
[Semi-spoiler]
Finally, the best part is the Caitlyn Jenner segments (you'll need to watch to understand this)
uptil I saw the paycheck four $4289 , I have faith that my mom in-law could actualie bringing in money part-time at there computar. . there sisters neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about thirteen months and by now paid for the mortgage on there condo and bought a brand new Alfa Romeo .????????? http://www.factoryofincome.com
uptil I saw the paycheck four $4289 , I have faith that my mom in-law could actualie bringing in money part-time at there computar. . there sisters neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about thirteen months and by now paid for the mortgage on there condo and bought a brand new Alfa Romeo .????????? http://www.factoryofincome.com
Excellent. Highly recommended watch.