Yes, the World is Getting Better. Here's Why.
Reason TV set out to cheer up Venice Beach doomsayers with evidence of positive global trends.
A CNN poll earlier this year found that a majority of Americans are pessimistic about the future of the country. That's consistent with prior polling, which discovered that a majority thinks the next generation will be worse off than their own. Are the worries that underpin this trend legitimate?
Reason TV went to the Venice Beach boardwalk to gage how people are feelings about the future, with the goal of cheering up the doomsayers. Maybe it was just the pleasant beachside atmosphere, but, at first, most people told us they feel a sense of optimism about the future.
With a little digging into the issues, however, we uncovered the seeds of pessimism. Many referenced one particular (orange) presidential candidate. So we responded with some statistics and success stories that should give even the most hardened pessimist hope for a better future.
General trends over the past few decades in numerous categories are good cause for hope and—dare we say—optimism for the future. From the massive declines in war and street violence to the reforestation of the planet, from rising living standards and huge reductions in global poverty to the democratization of the world's political regimes, things are looking up for humanity and our neighboring species in a plethora of ways.
The World's Forests Are Not Being Obliterated
Take the seemingly perpetual and intractable problem of deforestation, which dominates media reports every year around Earth Day. In fact, scientists call the present turnaround in the world's forests the "Great Reversal," and a study from Rockefeller University and the University of Helsinki found that the forests in a majority of countries have been thickening for the past few decades.
Part of this reversal is thanks to a more remarkable trend: Contrary to 1970s-era Malthusian warnings of mass famine and starvation, advances in biotech and agriculture have led to a tripling of the amount of food grown on just 10 percent more land. If crop yields had been stuck at 1960s levels, we would have needed to farm an area almost twice the size of South America to feed the doubling population. The global adoption of genetically modified crops has also reduced chemical pesticide use by 37 percent and increased farmer profits by 68 percent.
What's more, the efficiencies in farming and other factors have increasingly encouraged urbanization. Rural populations will be nearly cut in half by 2050 according to U.N. projections, potentially returning huge plots of land to nature. And researchers at Rockefeller University say we might be on the verge of peak farmland, meaning an area twice the size of France could become available for other uses come 2060.
The Decline in Violence
Another trend that contradicts pessimistic prognostications is the overall decline in violence. Not only has the FBI documented just about every metric of violence on a downward trend since the mid 1990s, gun violence in particular was cut in half in that period despite a doubling of gun sales. But fear of violence persists thanks to breathless media coverage of terrorism and mass shootings that fails to put the magnitude of the problem in proper context.
Atrocities committed by groups like ISIS and dictators like Syria's Bashar Al-Assad are real and horrifying, but those tragic death tolls are still dwarfed by the mass murder and genocide that was commonplace in the era of Communism and Fascism. And while the threat of terrorism looms large in America, a civilian on U.S. soil is about four times more likely to be struck by lightning than killed in a terrorist attack.
Living Standards Are Improving
Unemployment is back around 5%, but that's partly because many Americans have dropped out of the labor force altogether. But there's still good reason for optimism about the economy if historical trends hold.
If you break down the income of Americans into quintiles and think of them as rungs on the economic ladder, 95 percent of families on the lowest rung move up at least one rung in their lifetime, with a majority moving up to the top two rungs to join the top 40 percent of American earners. And 82 percent of kids whose parents were on the bottom rung move up at least one rung.
We're also getting more bang for our buck. The number of work hours Americans have to log to afford household appliances and luxury goods has steadily declined since the 1950s, and GDP keeps rising even though people are working fewer and fewer hours. In the 1930s, Americans spent more than a quarter of their disposable income on food; now, it's less than 10 percent.
The dramatic gains have accrued to the planet's poorest people. More than a billion people have climbed out of extreme poverty since 1990, cutting the global poverty rate in half.
President Trump?
How about the orange elephant in the room? Regardless of your feelings about Donald Trump or any other potential political leader, there's good reason to be optimistic about human freedom and the decline of authoritarianism across the globe. Countries have been dumping their autocratic dictators in favor of democratically elected representatives; in fact, most countries are now democracies.
Many of the people we spoke with were optimistic about the freedom that technology provides, our increasingly tolerant society, and the ever-expanding consumer choice that's improving all of our lives.
So, have we cheered you up?
About 8 minutes.
Produced by Zach Weissmueller and Justin Monticello. Hosted by Weissmueller. Camera by Monticello and Weissmueller. Additional graphics by Joshua Swain.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notification when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But income inequality!
How about forest inequality? Not all forests are created equally and the most valuable (like the Amazon) are not becoming denser, but getting clear cut.
This was a good one. Just go make your money and don't worry about the dipshits in government.
If everyone would approach life with the profit motive in mind and mindful of creative destruction, then we could be optimistic that government would become ever more moot.
The ony thing to be pessimistic about is the complacency of the mouth breathing masses.
There will be some amazing smart shit to come along however to keep them content with lesser education. In short, the answer o the question is, depends o the subject.
Stop telling me what to do! You aren't my real Dad!
Make a Grocery List: Feds Teach People How To Shop for Food
We do this. It does save money and time.
Google tasks app. Look up recipes and punch the list in on my PC, check it off on my phone while I'm shopping. I'm sure there are apps specifically for this sort of thing, but google already syncs my account between devices and their products are reliable.
I use Alexa. I just tell her to add it to my list. I'll check out google tasks.
People don't just do this naturally? Really?
If your not taking the time to plan a meal and check the pantry, then you aren't going to follow a tweet to a government webpage and take their advice to heart.
There are at least a dozen apps just on Apple for maintaining a weekly grocery list.
Once again, government waste time on a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
Nate, that's one of the things the government does best - come up with solutions in search of a problem.
They really do think wouldn't be able to feed themselves without them.
Or put together coherent sentence.
*shigh* I guess I had that one coming.
*...think people wouldn't be able to...*
When is the era of Amazon-style food delivery going to be realized? Seriously, how crude and inefficient is it to wander around a shopping mart picking out food items, having to remember the general layout or guessing how products are shelved, and then carting all those items out to the car and home? It's not like we're trying on produce like we do clothes (and tech-assisted bespoke clothing is long past due, by the way). Just think how much more efficient warehousing foods would be: less footprint, no need for the ambient niceties of consumer retail, items are all cataloged, orders could be submitted online and assembled by runners and either picked up or delivered. And given a more streamlined, tech-assisted approach, huge Amazon-like efficiency might be realized with greater consumer predictability and therefore less spoilage. The traditional grocer should be dead or greatly downsized or relegated to specialty or ethnic markets.
There is a app for that here. Shipt. It only does publix, but that is where I shop anyways.
I just hate grocery stores so much. So. Much. Even more than Jack Johnson.
There's also Blue Apron (not quite the same thing CS was talking about). Also, I think some other grocery stores are doing online ordering and delivery. Here in Denver I've seen delivery trucks for King Soopers (aka Kroger's most everywhere else - and yes they spell "Soopers" like that, I don't know why).
Not to mention tech-assisted housekeeping: if you're ordering all your groceries online, you have your current inventory at your fingertips. Given a computerized catalog on the retailer's end, you'd even have expiration dates. You would more or less know from your PC what you have on hand and what you need. I can see plugins for recipe websites importing shopping lists and paring down what you already have. Amazon just invented a little device that lets you pre-order essentials like toilet paper or detergent before you've run out, but what about pre-populating lists that add eggs, coffee, milk etc. to your order?
Blue Apron
Hello Fresh
You have options, but they're really fucking expensive, and the only parts better than the grocery store are the delivery and the recipes.
When Bezos finally returns my calls, you'll see. You'll all see.
"When is the era of Amazon-style food delivery going to be realized?"
This. I look forward to the day when we all make each other rich delivering food to each other.
Also, specializing: we stock grocery stores with a ton of products unrelated to groceries because it's convenient being able to pick up cookware, dish soap, toilet paper, alcohol, etc from the store you're already having to spend an hour or so a week. Maybe it makes sense to stock those things in the post-grocery store grocers of tomorrow, but if it's cheaper and more competitive to just offer perishables and canned goods, shoppers will shift their consumption of such things to Walgreens/CVS.
It seems Amazon is in on the idea, but naturally, regulators may derail it.
Fuck you, San Francisco.
Because no one would ever want a grocery store near where they live?
Not in my backyard.
"It seems Amazon is in on the idea,"
There is nothing new about the idea. In the neighbourhood where I live, there are food laden trucks that pass by once a day or so and one can buy all the essentials at a price lower than the marketplace offers. If you need something more exotic than the truck has on offer, there is always FedEx.
If you've decided to live in a Leftist enclave, you shouldn't be surprised when you're treated like a serf.
Hy-vee in Iowa offers home delivery, even in my little town.
Probably would never use it though. I work from home so I have to find reasons to leave.
Seriously, how crude and inefficient is it to wander around a shopping mart picking out food items, having to remember the general layout or guessing how products are shelved, and then carting all those items out to the car and home?
This, and car dealerships kill me too. Land taken up with cars parked all over it so that people can look at cars they could easily buy online and have delivered.
Of course, we know why the dealership system exists...
It's not like we're trying on produce like we do clothes
Bad example. Produce is one thing in the grocery store that many people do exactly (OK, not exactly) that with.
I also find that browsing in an actual store gives you the opportunity to see things you might not think to search for online (or which the predictive software wouldn't decide to show you). That's just my own preference, of course. I like browsing. More Amazon style delivery would be great, I'm sure. But I don't expect to see it where I live anytime soon.
Fair point. Amazon and other sites haven't killed retail fashion shopping, but they certainly move a lot of inventory--probably more, if we could shop by body type or even limb-specific measurements rather than merely inseam and waist size. And I agree, one of the benefits of wandering around the store is coming up with ideas, but recipe websites do that, too.
I'm not saying it's a silver bullet, I'm sure there are a number of reasons it hasn't happened already, but the whole homemaker routine is pretty tiresome.
orders could be submitted online and assembled by runners and...
You misspelled "robots."
And after Clinton and Saunders have their way "submitted online" won't be necessary. You'll get the standard daily ration of ethnically diverse nutrition packets like everyone else.
Make a Grocery List: Feds Teach People How To Shop for Food
I'll go with, 'leave work by 1500 hrs. to leisurely stroll about the market everyday whimsically concocting the evening's meals like a bourgeois Frenchman' thanks.
You're what's wrong with this grocery store-infested world. DEATH TO GROCERS.
The people who don't know how to shop for food tend to be those using food stamps or the equivalent. Once you have "money" you can only use for what the government considers "food" you can't save food stamps and transfer them to other segments of your budget. Therefore you no longer have any incentive to shop economically.
"The number of work hours Americans have to log to afford household appliances and luxury goods has steadily declined since the 1950s,"
Yeah, but how many hours do I have to work to afford the house to put those appliances in and the health insurance I'm forced to buy?
House size has increased dramatically. If you want to buy a 1000 sq ft house without central heat and air, no one is stopping you. Obamacare is evil.
HEY! My 100sq ft house has Central heating and has the hardware to be fitted with central air with just a compressor. Don't look down on it because it doesn't sprawl.
I don't look down on it. Houses in the 90's were big for the sake of being big. Now builders are making houses more functional. Why pay for spaces you never use?
My 100sq ft house has Central heating and has the hardware to be fitted with central air with just a compressor.
At that size, "central" heating and air is just a space heater and a window unit.
It's 1000sqft, I just have a problem with typing.
QUIT SHACKSHAMING UCS.
My point was mainly that the appliances have gotten cheaper, but the houses (even the 1000 sqft hotboxes) have just increased in price like there is no ceiling.
Prices dropped after the bubble burst. I don't know where you are located but there is plenty of affordable housing in FL.
What dollar value are we talking? I want to know what the "bug, gator and python infested swamp" discount is.
The discount is zero, because you can't build on wetlands.
/shakes fist at EPA
Okay, what's the price where you can build?
My friends bought new construction in winter garden. For a 4 bed, 3 bath, 3 car garage they paid 250K.
So what's a 1000sqft with central heating/air cost? I wasn't looking at four bedroom houses, so I'm having trouble comparing.
114k for 1200
... I paid 82k for 1000.
Nice.
Come to my neck of the woods in NC (about and hour outside of Raleigh) and the market is currently 100 - 115K for a 1200 to 1400 sq ft home on a little more than half an acre of land so long as you are not buying new construction.
Here in Dallas, things are astronomical. My wife and I bought in as the market started recovering in 2013, but with all of the companies moving into our area, we have a local seller's market. We are moving out of town in 8 months or so, but if we were to sell today, we would have over 100k in equity in the house. Only about 10k of that is from us paying the mortgage down.
It's a bubble, and it's gonna pop, but I really hope it holds on for a few months longer. I could really use a 6-figure dent in my student loans!
Where are y'all moving to?
My wife and I are looking all over, but fuck if I don't want to have to drive 1-2 hours just to get to work in the morning.
We're likely going to end up in DC. I'm graduating law school this fall, and the company I'll be working with this summer has told me that they're interested in taking me on full time after I graduate. I'm hesitant to say that it's gonna happen until I have an offer letter in hand, though.
I have an option to stay in town with the company, but I'm really unhappy with the way the whole N. Dallas/Plano/Frisco/McKinney area has turned into a traffic nightmare. We live out in the Plano/Wylie/Garland area, so I was commuting 1:15 each way when I worked downtown. God forbid the crash of the morning on 75 was south of me, then I had a 2 hour commute! That's just not acceptable for a 20 mile commute.
Damn, talk about an expensive market. I heard DC is practically insane.
If you think Dallas is bad, wait until you experience the car-train-subway-walk commute from northern Virginia to D.C. where Virginia houses are far more expensive and you end up paying multiple state income taxes.
In Dallas as well &, yeah, the market here's crazy. Once for sale, houses in our neighborhood are getting snatched up damn near immediately. And from what I've been told, at the ask price.
It's so rediculous, we're getting 1 to 2 *handwritten* offers a week from people wanting to buy our house straight-up. For cash. I just toss 'em in the trash, but damn, if that's not a sigh of an overheated, about-to-be-fucked market, I don't know what is.
Hope you're able to sell before it gets all dicked up.
I'm in Dallas. I just read an article that average new home price was $300k. I don't think we saw even a dip after the bubble.
It's gonna hurt hard when the next one burst though.
Denver didn't see much of a dip either. An average 3 bed, 2 bath house tends to cost well over $300k here. Same as before the bubble, and there's a shitload of new construction going on. There was a slight slowdown in new construction and a small drop in proces immediately after the bubble, but we recovered pretty quickly.
As shown here, the ratio of median home price to median income has risen for the last 50 years, from a 2:1 ratio to around a 4:1 ratio.
People buy way more house than they can afford.
My house cost only 8k more than my annual income.
But yes, in the varied discussions with my agent we did get into people overbuying. (and it's probably part of why my loan officer liked working with me - that and having my papers in order promptly)
30 year mortgages and interest deductions helped a lot too.
Absolutely!
Must feed the debt monkey
There's no better way to live like a rich person (while being poorer than the homeless guy you feel sorry for)
Living within my means carries the conforting reassurance that I can keep this going indefinately provided no catastrophes.
Living like a rich person means I'd be doomed to a crash and hard times before too long.
I'm an enormous Dave Ramsey fan. His way of putting it has just stuck with me. "You have to live like no-one else so that you can eventually live like no-one else."
"Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."
...Mr. Micawber
Poor Mister Micawber, rendered nonsensical by decimalization.
My 1000 sq ft house has heating and central air. Though the technical size is misleading because the finished basement rooms almost double the available living space. Affordable after 2 years in the workforce, though like 3-4 months in those 2 years were unemployed because my first out-of-school job decided to ax my department. Sizable houses are relatively affordable as long as you're not stupidly insisting on living somewhere ridiculously expensive.
The number of work hours Americans have to log to afford household appliances and luxury goods has steadily declined since the 1950s
Are you doing the math with pre-tax or post-tax dollars?
I'm sure its still true, but I suspect with post-tax dollars the delta isn't nearly as big.
I don't think taxes were better in the 50's.
http://www.bloomberg.com/view/.....-nightmare
Don has done a whole series of pieces like this. It really is that big. And he's only comparing 1975 to present. That doesn't count the decline from the 50s to 1975.
The University of "Helinski"? Yikes.
I think the commentator/voice-over meant "Helsinki" (hell-SINK-ee).
National debt and monetary policy make me nervous.
Because it reminds you who sets it?
It should make us all nervous. My tinfoil hat & I've been buying small amounts of gold every now & then for about the last year. Shit's gonna hit the fan sooner or later.
*walks over to bunker door & checks padlock - secure*
I think that's smart. I've been thinking about it
A 70 year old lady wrote in to the paper complaining about young, healthy looking people not giving up their seats on the train to her. They stare at their phone and pretend not to see her. I would be optimistic if the old lady had written, "I realize that my generation completely fucked the younger generation by piling debt upon them. From now on I will offer free, gummy head to any young man on his way to work to pay off the debt my generation accumulated." Either that, or she could not take the train during rush hour or shut the hell up.
Moochin' war widows...
I'm in Japan. They don't marry babies here!
Straffinrun's generation screwed itself further with six figure student loans for degrees that qualify them to pour coffee at Starbucks, so it's not all the old lady's fault.
Lots of 50 year olds working at Starbucks?
Lots of 50 year olds are not even employed anymore. By the way, what's your generation doing about the debt and deficit? Besides pissing and moaning about it I mean.
You mean those of us born in the 60s like myself? Most of them are just bitching about it. I left when I realized nothing I could do to change it. May have to find another Asian country to move to soon. Yeah, I know, I'm a traitor.
That's not being a traitor, that's making a logical choice. I'd make it myself if my family circumstances were different and the IRS wouldn't gobble up an unacceptable fraction of my net worth if I split.
A CNN poll earlier this year found that a majority of Americans are pessimistic about the future of the country.
I believe any poll in a presidential election year will always show this. I mean, people don't run for president telling you everything is on the right track.
While it may be true that authoritarianism is declining across the globe, our government seems to be getting more authoritarian, not less. Also, I'll point out that just because more countries are "democratic" doesn't necessarily mean that the politicians that are elected are any better than the "autocratic dictators." In fact, in some ways they may be worse because an elected leader can claim legitimacy by pointing to the election and saying "I won." A tyranny supported by the majority is still a tyranny.
A tyranny supported by the majority is still a tyranny.
It is potentially the worst tyranny as it is largely immune to the fear of rebellion that acts as a brake on Monarchist systems. We have fetishized democracy in place of liberty, and they are not at all the same thing.
If someone could tell me how we're going to defuse the $50,000,000,000,000-$70,000,000,000,000 accrual basis underfunded entitlement time bomb, without massive incivility, THEN I might see some light at the end of the pessimism tunnel.
Until then, people are whistling past the graveyard.
And before answering, please re-review the wonderfully "civil" times Wisconsin faced in 2010 adjusting state employee benefits, figuratively a fire cracker compared to the underfunded benefit time bomb at the Fed level,much less all the underfunded state defined benefit plans, and the "insured" private plans.
In short, people are approximately half as wealthy as they think they are, and that's right now. I can't be optimistic about the future until the massive misconceptions of wealth and who owns it settled NOW is reconciled.
More tactful than what I wrote, but this^.
http://www.justfacts.com/nationaldebt.asp
Linked the above the other day, but bears repeating. The skinny excerpted (essentially the "accrual" basis debt -
$237,284 for every person living in the U.S.[26]
$613,531 for every household in the U.S.[27]
423% of the U.S. gross domestic product.[28]
2,192% of annual federal revenues.[29]
The insane promises under defined benefit programs have essentially led people to be doped as to their true financial position, and have them happily eating their food corn AND their seed corn and thinking they're "rich". The asininity of such policies, and deluded thinking, is upon us.
And there's NO technological breakthrough that will make laborers more productive enough to even make a dent in the above excerpted reality.
Seeing shit like this REALLY has me wondering what Reason's mission really is. By the day I see it a complicit partner in dumbing people down to economic realities.
The Fed is bragging about getting a little of their inflation. The monster you want is going to eat the monster you're fighting. Of course they'll pound savers and fixed income retirees by eventually going to neg int rates. I can't imagine any way to slice it as anything other than a giant shit storm.
The Feds have been playing around with interest rates, debt issuance, and currency debasement for decades (as well as warfare/de facto mercantilism, but that doesn't play well here at Reason) and there's no where left to go. The smoke is clearing, and the second pile of gold you thought you saw was only a reflection in a mirror.
But as you say, negative interest rates. What a breathtakingly fascistic reality being discussed so blithely, but yet we're supposed to putting on a happy face over the next hot app that will be coming down the pike.
Ignorance used to be bliss. Now ignorance only gets you an unspecified dread and oblique fear that doesn't hold a candle to the terror associated with the collapse that is coming.
It's just the "We aren't Mises!" stuff going around here that fuels that. Also, if you had a leader that let the markets sink or swim on their own, you could see a sharp correction followed by a robust recovery like in the recession of 1920-21.
Being an optimist doesn't require believing that nothing bad will ever happen. Even if the whole thing does come crashing down in our lifetime, there's no reason not to acknowledge the positive trends.
And even if we are doomed, there's no reason not to try to be happy in the mean time.
But there's a difference between being rationally happy if you have something to be happy about and being happy because you're deluded that Soylent Green Tuesday is something to be happy over.
And the point is that we do have things to be happy about, even if we also have things to be unhappy about. It's perfectly rational and sensible for most people to focus on the happy things where there isn't a damn thing they can do about the unhappy ones.
Agreed. So long as it doesn't leave one a torpid host to endless parasites. Maybe one has to redefine what they MUST do to eliminate some unhappy circumstances. But we all know what happens when people show even the SLIGHTEST, largely humorous, rejections of the folks who have brought all this upon us. That is, don't go long on woodchippers if you know what's good for you.
In short, Life is Beautiful wasn't a how-to-cope instructional video.
They fall into the same tabloid bullshit that everybody else does. It's more "sexy" to argue about who pisses where than spend all their efforts screaming that "the end is nigh," even though it is.
The answer is the nudollar.
All old dollars will no longer be legal tender, along with any bonds issued in old dollars being voided.
And the smoking cinder this country will be when that occurs trouble you at all?
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sarcasm
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opacity
In other words, I've seen plenty of people say the exact same thing AND MEAN IT.
When it comes to H&R my default assumption when seeing shit like that is sarcasm. Unless it's PB, Am Soc, Tony, or one of the other deluded trolls.
You don't read too many of my posts I'd wager.
To be fair, who does?
No one...
*kicks stone, shuffles away*
Honestly, mostly as a lurker, it's hard to differentiate.
My apologies.
But the scariness of the situation is I've heard both leftists and rightists talk about repudiation and "fiat reset" with calmness and surety that all will be well.
Such a circumstance would be an actual nightmare. It's pretty much only happened in places like Zimbabwe and Weimar Germany, where the value of the money was in ludicrous freefall, and it didn't work there.
Well, you can't win them all. Optimism is still good. Not at the expense of a realistic view of the world. Yeah, the entitlement stuff could get ugly. But there are still lots of positive trends and while they won't negate the damage from the bad things, they nevertheless make the future look brighter. Optimism and pessimism are orientations. You can be a realist and still be optimistic.
If you can be optimistic, given the incivilities recently recorded for SMALL reconciliations, that there's an accrual level of federal debt per household north of $630,000 (as estimated in the above link) while the average net worth is $300,000 (median is $45,000) then more power to you. What it means, my wife and I being in the ~85th percentile of savers, are actually beyond broke. Oh well.
The video goes on about how there's been massive declines in violence and deaths etc etc. It has been funded by making people think there's TWICE as much wealth than there is. That's no small "nip and tuck" situation to resolve. It has the capability of crashing our civilization.
cont
We live in a world if people have to wait at a stop light longer than they want to, they'll just do what they want. We live in a world where if people don't get everything they want, somebody stole it. We live a world where property rights are largely extinguished. And we have to reconcile everyone to the fact that they're half as well off as they thought. EVERYONE. FIFTY PERCENT.
As I said, there's no fast enough pace to technological growth, as it enhances per person productivity, that will even scratch the surface of the imbalances that need to be reconciled. People are shortly going to be presented with massive confiscations of their wealth WITH sharp declines in services. And no video game app will divert people from this reality.
To be fair, I don't think most people are pessimistic about the future. Well, I mean we will always have the malthusians, luddites, death cultists, and other doomsayers with us. But most people I think are not pessimistic about the future except then politics is thrown in. I'm very optimistic about the future, but I'm pessimistic in regards to politics and politicians being able to not only derail any improvement, but to totally destroy any and all aspects of a possibly brighter future. Left to it's own, I fully believe that technology will, as it has always done, ensure a better future.
"I fully believe that technology will, as it has always done, ensure a better future."
More technology will ensure more bureaucracy and less autonomy, not typically what Libertarians are aiming at. This happens not because of the good or bad intentions of politicians, but because that's the nature of technology.
Yes. The invention of nuclear weapons, and later the LP, made it certain that socialism, especially in its communo-fascist variants, simply has to disappear one way or another. I recall that back when I had to trudge through snow and sweat through jungle, American kids were kidnapped to murder & die in 'Nam while Nixon lit his cigars with ten-dollar bills.
I'm not going to miss the Communist OR Republican parties, and expect the Dems will become less looterlike when given a good example by a new adversary party.
An awful lot of people are Malthusians and environmental doom cultists, though. I have no idea how many as a percentage of population. But people love predicting doom.
I wouldn't know how to answer Zach's, "Is gun violence getting better or worse?" question. I'm terrible at violence, but does that make it better?
"Rural populations will be nearly cut in half by 2050 according to U.N. projections"
I'm optimistic about our UN masters herding us into crowded cites.
The world sucks because the last two decades suck for the entertainment industry.
Art has been hijacked, nobody wants to take a risk on talent anymore. I don't know if independent record labels make anymore than 6 figures nowadays.
That explains all the fear and pessimism. If we lived during the 70's, we'd be all "I'm way optimistic, maan! Love will prevail. Make love, not war!"; because we had stuff to jam out to; Classic movies being produced.
That being said, I'm optimistic good art will make a comeback in the future... it's going to eventually come about through this digital currency hype, and people boycotting the ent. machine.... Anyway, that's what I'd be pointing out if I was getting interviewed in Venice Beach; entertainment has got worse.
My best friend's sister makes $97 an hour on the internet . She has been out of a job for 6 months but last month her check was $15950 just working on the internet for a few hours.Go to tech tab for more work detail..
.Read more on this web site...
See Here Now.------------------------ http://www.earnmore9.com
The statement about deforestation is misleading. It's true that forests are becoming larger carbon sinks (probably in part due to higher CO2 concentrations and warmer temperatures), but the total forest area still appears to be decreasing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XFS_oCETaw
There is probably nothing to be done about it, and it will likely reverse itself at some point. But so far, forest area is still being lost, and that's what people mean by "deforestation".
Most of us want to have good income but don't know how to do thaat on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn money at home, so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the site. More than sure that you will get best result.OI3..
====== http://www.CashPost7.com
Start making more money weekly. This is a valuable part time work for everyone. The best part work from comfort of your house and get paid from $100-$2k each week.Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week. For more details Check this link??
Clik This Link inYour Browser
? ? ? ? http://www.MaxPost30.com
Start making more money weekly. This is a valuable part time work for everyone. The best part work from comfort of your house and get paid from $100-$2k each week.Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week. For more details Check this link??
Clik This Link inYour Browser
? ? ? ? http://www.MaxPost30.com
not to sure what planet these authors are living on but for starters dirty little chinese demand for ivory is obliterating the elephant population in africa.....american troops in afghanistan are pseudo drug lords for the heroin trade......and the wealth gap in addition to irresponsible procreation are the catalyst for millions of zombie like homeless people all across america....for starters.......you can't enjoy a fucking coffee anymore without seeing a signholder sleeping outside of starbucks
Good work. The Roe v. Wade decision the DemoGOP Court delivered, after Tonie Nathan and John Hospers landed an electoral vote, led to a huge decrease in the crime rate predictable by the statistical induction reported in Freakonomics. Canada completely repealed all abortion laws a decade and a half later and likewise had a consistent and continuing drop in crime rates. Crime itself is being redefined along libertarian lines, as sumptuary tarbrushing of victimless enjoyment is recognized as beneficial or at least harmless. The asset-forfeiture crash--the third major depression brought on by looter and prohibition laws--has taught politicians they'd better back off or be replaced by libertarians (and pick food out of trashcans in their old age). But there is still a heck of a lot of work to be done.
This really fine video is an example of that good work.
good if you will be at your workplace, functioning and your chosen Vidmate APK you can set up the true type of Vidmate Apk for Android clever mobile phone. Vidmate Download nice.
My best friend's ex-wife makes $95/hr on the laptop. She has been unemployed for 6 months but last month her income with big fat bonus was over $15000 just working on the laptop for a few hours.
Read more on this site.--------------------------- http://www.earnmore9.com
Amelia . although Gregory `s story is shocking... on sunday I bought a top of the range volvo from making $4129 this last 4 weeks and more than ten thousand last-month . it's actualy the most-financialy rewarding I have ever had . I actually started 7-months ago and almost immediately started to earn minimum $85... per-hour . go to this website.....
---- http://www.MaxPost30.com
I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.
============ http://www.Path50.com
I looked at the bank draft which had said $7437 , I be certain ...that...my friend could realie earning money in their spare time on-line. . there neighbor has done this for less than twelve months and resently paid the morgage on their mini mansion and got a great new Lancia . have a peek here....
Simply tap On This sort of Link -
=========? http://www.Path50.com
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8012 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...------------------------- http://www.cash-spot.com
up to I looked at the check of $4791 , I did not believe ...that...my neighbour could actualie earning money in there spare time on their laptop. . there friend brother has been doing this for less than 7 months and resently cleard the morgage on their mini mansion and purchased a great Bugatti Veyron . you could look here ........
Click This Link inYour Browser....
?????? http://www.Reportmax20.com
Now, coming to the Showbox app, this is another superb app developed for movie lovers who want to get a better experience of watching movies and tv show on a bigger screen with more detailings.
And one of those applications is Showbox apk app. It is one of the best online streaming application for watching Movies and TV Shows. In the starting, this application has been released for only a few of the mobiles and allows users to watch shows online.
Yes i am always positive about my life. The world is great if we think postive!
Very interesting Video. I shared this post.
Regards,
dr martin huang
Yep. idiocracy used to be hilarious. Now it's just here.
Replete with fomenting politicians, moronic bureaucrats, whores as status symbols, and for some strange reason, obsession over bathroom trips.