How South Park Saved Fair Use
'What, What (in the Butt)' set legal precedent protecting free speech rights.
"I hope that the law students today are having to watch Butters sing 'What, What (in the Butt)' in their classrooms. I hope that's the legacy in this case," says Parker Higgins, director of copyright activism at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
For 19 seasons South Park has provided cutting cultural commentary centered around the foul-mouthed adventures of fourth graders Stan, Kyle, Kenny and Cartman.
And while it's a cartoon for adults, the raunchy animated show has helped establish an important legal entertainment precedent that expands free speech rights.
"When anybody creates anything basically that thing automatically gets copyrighted and for the most part it can't be used in certain ways without permission," states Higgins. "But there are some really important exceptions to that rule and there are some really important places where we say actually members of the public no matter who they are can use this thing for all sorts of reasons without getting permission."
In 2010, EFF became unlikely allies with media giant Viacom—the owner of South Park—who was sued by Brownmark Films after a 2008 episode called "Canada on Strike" parodied a popular viral video by musician Samwell.
The case eventually made its way to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals where the judges ruled in favor of South Park and Viacom. The ruling has become an important one in entertainment law because it says that a fair use lawsuit can be stopped before going to trial—which can help content creators avoid the huge costs of litigation brought on by frivolous copyright lawsuits.
Eriq Gardner at the Hollywood Reporter notes that the 'What, What (in the Butt)' case has been the most cited in courtrooms across the country in the last five years thanks to the growth of digital content.
"Under the Supreme Court this is the highest precedent that you can have—that this Butters video is fair use," Higgins says. "The thing that's a little less fun is the fact it can stop lawsuits early. Anything that takes any of those threats off the table—especially at the circuit level—is going to be important for the legal system and for the rights of creators."
Approximately 4 minutes.
Produced by Alexis Garcia. Camera by Alex Manning. Music by Gunnar Olsen and Audionautix.
Scroll down for downloadable versions. Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel for daily content like this.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"director of copyright activism"
Just when I thought I'd heard it all, it's something else.
How did this guy find the time to do this interview with all the pussy he is getting with that haircut and glasses?
While I don't always agree with their organizational positions, the EFF is really looking out for our collective digital interests. I don't see other groups focusing on the same set of issues...
When the Butters video is shown at Yale Law School, will it be with trigger warnings and the option to opt out of that part of the class?
I saw that South Park episode before seeing the actual video. I was quite confused.
What, what?
I'm not going there.
Dear Alexis,
I followed the link in your article where "Eriq Gardner at the Hollywood Reporter notes that the 'What, What (in the Butt)' case has been the most cited in courtrooms across the country in the last five years thanks to the growth of digital content" because I was curious about the ground breaking that video saved everyone from fair use.
When I went to click on play, hilarity ensued: http://i.imgur.com/q2tRnHy.png
*hands you a towel to clean that egg of your face*
That is ... beautiful.
On a separate note, do you realize that your initials are FaP? Just sayin'....
I type using both hands.
Just sayin'
So you use a Fleshlight?
I tried to watch South Park once - but the level of stupid was so beyond my pain tolerance l that I couldn't make it to the first commercial.
On the plus side - there's a real good test to determine if a person is in possession of more brain cells than needed to keep the autonomic system going - if they watch SP - pull the plug, chunk 'em in the clay, there's no brain function.
Your choice of entertainment is your business. I don't like the vast majority of what is on television - never have. I prefer to read over watching most of the junk on TV. But I do watch South Park. South Park isn't "stupid" it USES stupidity to make a point. Near the end of the episode discussed here, Kyle says "Yeah, but you know, I learned something today. We thought we could make money on the Internet. But, while the Internet is new and exciting for creative people, it hasn't matured as a distribution mechanism to the extent that one should trade real and immediate opportunities for income for the promise of future online revenue. It will be a few years before digital distribution of media on the Internet can be monetized to the extent that necessitates content producers to forego their fair value in more traditional media."
What, What (in the Butt)'
set legal precedent protecting free speech rights.