The Tragic History of China's Secret Labor Camps
Laogai prison survivor Harry Wu on human rights abuses in China.
"In China, they want you to become [a] new socialist person, and that's the purpose of the labor camps," says Harry Wu, a survivor of the prison system known as "Laogai," which means "reform through labor."
"The major job in the prison camp is to survive, to find food, that's it," says Wu.
When the Communist Party of China came to power in 1956, Mao invited Soviet state experts into the country to develop a Gulag-style prison network to suppress "counter-revolutionaries" and torture political opposition.
At the age of 23, Wu was imprisoned in the Laogai system simply because his father was a banker. While the official numbers are a state secret, at the height of Mao's reign, Wu estimates there were "1,000 labor camps and probably more than 40 million people in the prison camps."
After Mao died in 1979, the Laogai system was gradually dismantled and most political prisoners, including Wu, were released.
By 2013, the Chinese government officially turned away from using labor camps as a tactic of "re-education." But last year, a report by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission expressed "legitimate doubts" that China has entirely stopped the practice of sending prisoners to labor camps.
After he immigrated to America, Wu opened the Laogai Museum to honor the victims and to spread awareness of the ongoing human rights abuse by the Communist Party of China. Wu is also the founder of the Laogai Research Foundation.
The Laogai Museum is located in Washington D.C., but Wu hopes someday to relocate it to China.
"One thing is very, very simple: No one in China believes communism is their future," he says. When it will be entirely gone, however, "we do not know."
Produced by Joshua Swain and Robert Mariani.
Approximately 4 minutes.
Watch the video above and scroll down for downloadable versions. Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channel to get automatic updates when new stories go live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"One thing is very, very simple: No one in China believes communism is their future," he says. When it will be entirely gone, however, "we do not know."
The last bastion of TRUE Communism remains...
In academia, on USA college campuses!!!!
In America it's just avoiding ass-rape. Or death.
While the official numbers are a state secret, at the height of Mao's reign, Wu estimates there were "1,000 labor camps and probably more than 40 million people in the prison camps."
"After Mao died in 1979, the Laogai system was gradually dismantled and most political prisoners, including Wu, were released."
####
It's always surreal to look back and realize that as a kid, I lived through the time of the colossal crimes of Communism in Asia the 70s, and they went entirely unremarked in the mainstream media and political discourse.
My favorite story from the time is why the Khmer Rouge wouldn't shoot their victims - bullets cost money. Human beings were worth so little, and their regime such a primitive failure, that a bullet to the head was too much of an extravagance.
Instead, a nice, stout stick could cudgel thousands to their deaths. And they're a renewable resource!
+1 Shawshank Redemption
BBDD: Same same. I recall reading somewhere that the Khmer trained their conscripts to use the butts of their AKs to execute people. Cave their skulls in, not shoot them. The bullet was reserved for only the most dire of circumstance, but it allowed the threat of shooting. You use that threat to gain the upper hand/control, then just walk up and smash their skulls in with the buttstock.
Wonderful.
This may piss off some libertarians, and undoubtedly the left, but I can't help but bring up the "success" of the anti-war movement in the 60s, mostly through lies (including by one former presidential candidate) about what US Forces "really" did during the war, which led inevitably to the fall of Saigon, and then the deaths of millions upon millions of Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians. Yes, Virginia, there really was a domino effect.
I have only one question: if the US is morally culpable for however many deaths it caused during the Vietnam War - and the civilian deaths are always trotted out (by the left, particularly) as proof of how "bad" America is - it still comes up in public discourse now. (cont)
But IF the US is on the hook for the deaths it caused in Vietnam, then how do the wonderful People's Revolutions not get judged on the same moral metric? I mean, at the highest estimate, the US is on the hook for EVERYONE killed during 1965-1975 (hardly a defensible moral position, but fine, let's just assume it), the number caps out at something like 2 million Vietnamese.
The glorious people's revolutions that followed resulted in something more like ten million deaths, prisoners sent to re-education camps, a flood of refugees (some of whom showed up in our inner city elementary school in the late 70s, speaking zero english and surrounded by a bunch of white and black kids working out their racial issues), and it took place across three countries.
So for all those people who protested, demanded humane treatment for the poor Vietnamese, and called the US soldiers war criminals, where was the outrage over those same poor Vietnamese (and Laotians, and Cambodians, etc.) being slaughtered by the millions like cordwood from their loving communist brothers from the North?
I think you already know the answer to that?the Communists are closer to being their ideological kin, ergo they're not held to the same moral metric. Much more fashionable to hate on ostensible US atrocities.
Narrator just CANNOT pronounce "LAOGAI" to save his life. Holy shit. "legawai" is not really a good approximation...
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com