America's 3 Most Fee-Ridden Cities
Fees, fines, and petty law enforcement: Little ticky-tack violations can pile up quickly and are enough to drive even the most civic-minded citizens crazy. But they can also create an undercurrent of hostility between citizens and the government officials who are supposed to serve them. Former Reason writer Radley Balko uncovered a pattern of overzealous fee-collection in the suburbs of St. Louis county for The Washington Post and speculated that the overbearing law enforcement helped create a pressure-cooker environment that finally exploded in the wake of the Michael Brown shooting.
"When you have towns like those in St. Louis county that get in some cases, 40 percent of their municipal revenue in fines and fees, they have chosen a very expensive way of taxing their population, one that creates maximum hassle and maximum hostility," says Walter Olson, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and publisher of the blog Overlawyered.
Watch the video above for Reason TV compilation of America's 3 Most Fee-Ridden Cities, listed below:
3. Detroit, Michigan
In the wake of the largest municipal bankruptcy in history, Detroit launched a variety of revenue-generating schemes, such as raising the prices of parking meters in a downtown with a rapidly dwindling population and workforce. Unfortunately for the city, about half their meters are broken, making it one of the only cities to actually lose money on parking enforcement. But what really grants Detroit this honor is "Operation Compliance," an initiative pushed by former mayor David Bing aimed at bringing all of Detroit's small businesses up to code through costly permitting. The initiative launched with the stated goal of shutting down 20 businesses a week.
2. Ferguson, Missouri
Ferguson has stayed in the news for the massive protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown and for the militarized response of law enforcement to those protests. But tension between the citizens and the government run deep in Ferguson and the other nearby St. Louis suburbs. Citizens report of being constantly harassed by law enforcment over minor violations and then being forced to navigate through an overrun court system. The Washington Post reported that one courthouse in St. Louis County had issued five arrest warrants per citizen.
1. Bell, California
Residents of this tiny California town just south of Los Angeles rose up against the local government after learning that their city officials were robbing them with high property taxes and ridiculous parking fines and city fees in order to pay themselves exorbitant salaries. The ringleader was City Manager Robert Rizzo, who paid himself $1.5 million in annual salary and benefits in a town with a per capita household income of $24,800. Rizzo is now rotting in federal prison alongside his accomplice, former Assistant City Manager Angela Spaccia, but the town is still on the hook for the $137 million in debt left behind. Locals call it the "Rizzo Tax."
"Ideally, the local population would rise up and say, 'It's time to take back our town. Government is not just a revenue source. It should be an engine of justice.' Until that happens, we've got a much wider problem," says Olson.
Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by Paul Detrick, Tracy Oppenheimer, and Weissmueller. Approximately 4 minutes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hooray for 3 more shitty cities I didn't ever have a reason to visit to start with. Unless I want to see the worlds shittiest shitholes, or something.
Bring cash for bribes and municipal fees.
Someone should ask our resident race-baiters if Detroit government's policies are racist. Because last I heard, criticizing the Motor City's government was itself an act of racism.
Just obey, you silly animals. The establishment is there for a reason. Respect the uniform. Question nothing related to authority.
So said the entirety of the Outnumbered panel a few minutes ago. What a fucking putrid hash of brain-dead adherents TV has become host to.
Detroit... is that anywhere near Starnesville?
I guess I don't have many original thoughts.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/n.....e-to-life/
Cleveland was from Detroit... Dallas was from Phoenix, and Tex, well I don't remember where Tex was from.
Why are the cities numbered 3, 2, 3?
It seemed unfair to choose only one as the worst.
Because they changed direction. It's the infamous 'hockey stick' graph.
Hide the decline!
323 is the area code for Bell, CA!
I smell illuminatus!
We're in the Millennial generation now; old crap like editing and being able to count to 3 aren't hip anymore.
One... Two... Five
"Three shalt be the number thou shalt
count, and the number of the counting
shalt be three.
Four shalt thou not count,
nor either count thou two, excepting that
thou then proceed to three.
Five is right out. "
And the number of the counting shall be thrrrrrree!
Rizzo is now rotting in federal prison alongside his accomplice, former Assistant City Manager Angela Spaccia
Go on ....
Chained Heat, the Municipal Division
Your lunch time derp:
On Friday, someone at my company sent out a mass email. Since then, over 30 people have responded by asking to be taken off the distribution list. However, everyone who as done this so far has also replied to all, thus sending out another mass email.
herp herp herpa derp.
And now for a Simpsons flashback
I was thinking the other day of the episode where Homer gets in trouble with the IRS. He is brought into an intimidating bureaucrat's office.
Bureaucrat: Mr Simpson, this government computer can process 9 tax returns a day. Did you really think you could fool it?
Homer: No sir...sorry sir...an older boy told me to do it.
I have a hard time imagining the writers taking shots at the IRS now.
That drives me crazy. In my Outlook, at least, the "reply" and "reply all" buttons are clearly labeled. Are people using some keyboard commands instead, and they're right next to each other on the keyboard? Or do they just not know or care about the difference?
Ignorance is no excuse. This is the 3rd or 4th time this has happened since I began this job about a year ago.
It's habit.
The vast majority of e-mails that cross desks here have a number of people on them, and discussions are all 'reply-all'. So by habit, people will be hitting 'reply-all' to reply to e-mails. If they don't think about it, even when it's a massive list for stupid reasons.
But they can also create an undercurrent of hostility between citizens and the government officials who are supposed to serve them.
If you think the largest local criminal gang / mafia is "supposed to serve you", you are unclear about that predator - prey relationship, and quite possibly not paying attention to what happens when you interact with said alleged benefactors.
Granted, historically the people have served the State. The idea that it should be the other way around, while mentions from time to time, was and still is revolutionary. The United States was a radical experiment, and still is. We can drive the pocket-liners, benevolent buttinskis, and planners into the sea if we are prepared to make the effort.
Sadly, most if us aren't.
Now it is the nature of government to mess things up, but the idea of fees is something we want to encourage. For all the government tendency to charge the wrong amount to the wrong person, it is still an attempt to make the one wanting a government service pay for it instead of the taxpayer or other innocent bystander do so. That cuts down on the calls for "free" government services.
Of course we have to be wary of things like the government pricing fees based on how much they can squeeze us for rather than how much the service actually costs, but the basic idea is a good one.
Fees and fines should not be confused even if they are often mixed. A fee pays for the government doing something. A fine is paying the government to get out of your way. Both are of course abused by government, but we want as much of government as possible to be paid for by fee rather than fine.
A fee pays for the government doing something. A fine is paying the government to get out of your way.
FIFY. If the mob shows up and collects money for their protection, it's a fee not a fine, right?
Agreed that fees are better than outright litigation, but taht's just the protection scheme, and just because the government holds the market on whatever racket they're running doesn't make fees OK.
It would be fine if the fees were for an activity you could opt out of, and for which private market providers were available and with a level playing field with the government program.
Oh, wait, there are no such activities, since if the government had to compete head-to-head, who would use them?
In case anyone missed it, here's Gruber bragging about Ted Kennedy ripping off the feds to pay for Romneycare:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV9NRyQLjVU
And here is montage of about 20 of his lies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhavicDc0Ts
Warning: videos may cause Sudden Fist In Screen Syndrome.
OT: The War on Derp
I met a prog at a party the other day. We ended up talking about politics. When she brought up social justice, I asked her what the difference between that and regular justice is. Her answer was basically that social justice is about compassion and helping people. I believe that is called "charity".
Later, we talked about the causes of the Great Recession. She said it was caused by wacky Wall Street trades and deregulation. I said 1) stuff like short-selling & wacky derivatives have been around a long time and 2) Clinton is the one who repealed Glass-Steagal.
Well anyway, I ended up telling her that if she's interested in economics, she should look into this guy named Bastiat. I wrote it on slip of paper and she promised to look it up.
I'm terrible at parties aren't I?
She sounds like she has absorbed the talking points well.
Her answer was basically that social justice is about compassion and helping people.
Superman, that rat bastard, always helping people but doing so with the smug air of alien demi-god superiority!
Somebody ought give him and his regular justice a kryptonite boot to the nuts... and don't even get me started on that Captain American and his "selfless-patriotism" and "duty-to-country" B.S.
Now, Batman, there was a guy who cared...
The situation in the suburbs surrounding St. Louis is actually shocking. It's nothing but a racket run by an insane-multitude of city governments and some local attorneys (it's not uncommon to find one attorney a judge in one district, a prosecutor in another, and defense attorney in another) to give themselves salaries. Many of the residents are poor and get caught in a loop of citations, court fines, suspended licenses, etc., that is simply impossible to get out of. It's simply punitive.
Sort of shocked SF isn't on that list.
I've always been shocked at the absence of street meters in KC.
This a consistently Blue town, politically speaking. Most of the Red in the area is on the Kansas side. You'd expect a city like that to come up with the bright idea of charging it's residents to park near businesses and further drive them away. But aside from the downtown area, they're virtually non existent.
Not that they don't infuriate me with other things. Like the 1% earnings tax if you live or work there, the pointless attempt to spend over a billion dollars to turn a regional airport(Yes, it's called KCI, that's a generous overstatement.) into the hub of the Midwest when we're surrounded by Chicago, Dallas and Denver, and another billion or so to build a light rail system that travels the staggering distance of 4 miles or so.
But hey, free parking.
All libertarians should despise free curbside parking. It's socialist central planning that harms the poor, as buses are stuck in traffic created by people cruising for parking, motorists, who spend time and money looking for parking, and businesses, from the lack of turnover. Excessive fees for violators are a by-product of free parking; the lack of revenue from parkers must be made up by over-punishing violators. In a free market, parking would be priced off supply and demand. The government would not artificially lower the cost of parking spaces and use tax money collected from non-motorists to subsidize roads and parking.
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.jobsfish.com