5 Lessons Police MUST Learn from the Military on Crowd Control
"If people think that the police are looking like the military, then they assume that this perverted form of policing is what the military looks like. And it doesn't look anything like what the military does," says former Army officer Jason Fritz.
The fatal shooting of teenager Michael Brown by a Ferguson, Missouri police officer in August not only sparked protests but a national debate on the rise of police militarization across the country. The term "police militarization" refers to the idea that the local police units are becoming almost indistinguishable from the military, both in tactics and equipment.
However, some military veterans point out that while many local police departments are using military-grade equipment these days, they haven't been trained in crowd control and other essential tactics. Fritz, a West Point graduate who served six years as an Army officer, including three deployments to Iraq, says the police could learn at least five lessons from the military when it comes to crowd control, as outlined in the US Army Technique Publication 3-39.33:
1. Training Saves Lives
Leaders and police must have an understanding of how, when, and to what degree to use force, and this is only accomplished through extensive training. Buying equipment is just the beginning. Often having the equipment without training is more dangerous than not having any equipment at all.
2. Understand the Crowd
Crowds are composed of real people expressing a real grievance. Most protesters are law-abiding citizens exercising their fundamental right to assembly. They must be respected.
3. Openly Communicate with Protest Leaders
Using open dialogue with protest leaders as this often avoids misunderstandings and results in protesters policing themselves. Coercion of crowds, on the other hand, rarely results in good outcomes and often exacerbates the unrest.
4. Initiate a Graduated and Proportional Response
Police should negotiate their actions based on crowd behavior. A non-violent crowd warrants a non-violent police response. The unnecessary use of tear gas and guns tends to add to crowd panic and tends to increase rather than decrease unrest. If the crowd becomes violent, police should respond with the least amount of force necessary.
5. Record Everything
Recording everything in a civil disturbance helps hold everyone accountable for their actions — police and protestors alike. In addition to the police recording themselves, the media should not be treated as an enemy. Stifling and repressing the media only gives the impression that the police are trying to hide something.
By following these guidelines from the military, says Fritz, local law enforcement will be able to build communal relationships founded on trust instead of fear.
About 2 minutes. Produced and edited by Amanda Winkler.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channelfor notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
6. Don't intentionally murder civilians.
Not sure those ideas will really solve the problem. As I see it, the problem is that we have 'professionalized' government. From eliminating the militia muster and turned it into a permanent standing army. To consolidated school districts (with boards run by professional pedagogues and teachers unions) that eliminated the previous 100,000+ individual school boards (run by part-timers).
In every case, and probably inevitably, that professionalism brings with it a two-way loss of accountability and connection. The professionals/bureaucrats become more connected to similar professionals (see army providing ideas to police about crowd control). And everyone else becomes disconnected because they are no longer a necessary/integral part of their own community governance.
We are more than willing to simply abdicate what used to be considered a responsibility of self-governance (ie you gotta get involved in your community if you want to make it better - and this does not mean merely 'paying taxes' or 'voting') and retreat into (mass-media-manipulated) isolation.
^THIS * 1000^
I don't think the framers of the constituition envisioned working in government - either as an elected official or a bureaucrat - to become a lifelong career, yet here we are. And there's probably no going back. We're basically fucked.
That's assuming that saving lives (other than their own) is a goal. Although I suppose you might be able to convince them that training will save their own lives, Officer Safety, and all that. But training also requires them to actually work, so I don't know if their unions will go for that.
If a group of people feel like they are being oppressed by the LEO's and that same group is protesting how the LEO's are treating them the last thing you do before the protest even starts is show up in the most oppressive equipment you can find. It pretty much tells the protesters that they are correct and there is nothing they can do about it and when people feel they have no say in the subject then you leave them with the last resort which is violence.
This can not be emphasized enough.
The thugs that destroy property are something else.
I said pretty much the same thing... you said it with less words
Exactly.
University of Texas Police to Request DoD 2nd-Hand Apache Attack Helicopter and a few spare F-16s
When asked by CBS news about having surplus military hardware, Director of Police Michael Heidingsfield said:
"I am required to protect and serve the University of Texas System. I ought to employ and have in my repertoire every possible tool. ?.. but If I don't have it and we need it, I've not made the right decision."
http://clevernicknames.wordpre.....are-f-16s/
Record Everything
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Outstanding article. See the latest article at The Jeffersonian (http://sgreffenius.com/), Do you consider yourself beyond the law? The article's not on the subject of crowd control, but on the related subject of search and seizure.
I disagree with one statement "Crowds are composed of real people expressing a real grievance" This does not hold true for the major riots we have had since Rodney King. The Occupy Wall Street kooks, or the Ferguson problems. Americans have the right to peaceful protest.... as soon as you start screwing with people lives or us violence you have crossed the line.
"Stifling and repressing the media only gives the impression that the police are trying to hide something."
You say this like they don't have something to hide...
Getting the experience of working 16 or more hours per day during WTO n30 etc being in the middle of full scale riots with fiery missiles flying through the air cars being overturned and complete mayhem was absolutely life-changing experience. We compared very favorably to how European cops had handled the riots since we didn't even have a single death and there were several during the riots in Europe. We managed to deploy lethal, less lethal flying V arrest squads strong lines etc. etc. and were damn effective even after the idiot mayor of Seattle who had ill-prepared because he claimed European-style riots absolutely could not happen Seattle. Real cops had to fly all the way across the state of Washington to get more pepper spray etc. supplies since the idiot Copocrats and politicians in Seattle had said why it's just could never happen in Seattle. It was as game changing as the was Angeles Bank of America bank robbery was when cops had to run into gun stores to get longrifles since their idiot administrators had refused to provide them to patrol.
The ultimate ex
The ultimate example of how not to deal with rioting scum was when Seattle Police Department administration ordered Seattle cops to stand on the corner and let people riot during Mardi Gras. Gangbangers and anarchists most of whom who traveled from Oregon murdered Kris Kime because Seattle Police Department administrators did not want their officers to have been seeing on CNN hitting people with sticks God for bid.
Our agency had pretty expensive demonstration management training prior to WTO but I say with absolute certainty that there is simply no way to prepare officers for that kind of riot. Actual experience dealing with it is 100% necessary you just can't simulate that kind of thing in training
Thank God for CNN and local journalists since that was our resource for Intel that made all the difference in success versus failure. One of the best things we learned was how to effectively use video cameras and intelligence officers prior to and during the riots to help get a much better grasp on how do effectively deploy resources and how to get to the problem rioters
It's amazing how a small cadre of well-trained and extremely motivated Oregon based anarchists managed to turn a peaceful protest into end up seeing riot and completely destroy the good intentions of the overwhelming majority of peaceful protesters
These were the kind of ass munchies who were seen smashing the windows of Nike town to get back it all those evil capitalists while of course wearing Nike shoes at the same time
Again Mardi gras was the perfect example of how sometimes police inaction is 100 times worse then police use of force. Often the ramifications of not using force are far worse than the ramifications of using it
It reminded me of how administrators in my hawaii Police Department refused to send in SWAT when necessary against kosi. Finally after he sawed the head off his hostage and threw the decapitated corpse in the hallway then the administration finally realize that yes it was time to send in swat
In my experience the biggest impediments to successful demonstration management were liberal politicians who insisted that what had happened elsewhere in history just could not happen in their fair city.
Cop administrators have to be intelligent about deploying soft resources as well as hard resources properly stacking lethal, less lethal ,arrest teams and line officers
And they have to be willing to deploy intelligence resources especially armed with video cameras and willing to videotape the crowd from behind the lines as well as gather Intel from in the middle of the protesters
Of course Seattle city cops are hampered by liberal politicians who have passed ordinances prohibiting them from being able to effectively gather Intel but fortunately real police departments like ours don't have such restrictions
It's pretty sad when your city police department has to run to get help from outside agencies in order to gather Intel within their own city
I liked the old dumpy better.
Like shooting dogs and members of the general public, some things are best appreciated in-situ.
They police "must" learn these lessions? Why "must" they? What will happen to them if they don't?