Aereo, the Supreme Court, and the Future of TV
Analog regulations are straining to adapt to an increasingly digital world
The Supreme Court will soon reach its decision on the much-publicized American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, a case many believe will have a profound effect on the way we watch television.
Aereo rents small antennas and cloud storage to subscribers, allowing them to record and playback over-the-air broadcasts through digitally enabled devices. Broadcasters feel Aereo is retransmitting copyrighted work to paying customers and, based on current copyright law, should be subject to the same retransmission fees cable and satellite companies currently pay. Aereo argues that it is simply a technology company that empowers individuals and therefore isn't engaged in the "public performance" of copyrighted works subject to these fees.
April's oral arguments gave little indication of which way the Supreme Court will rule. The decision is expected any day now.
But no matter the outcome, this case underlines just how antiquated and unresponsive our regulatory and copyright framework has become in an increasingly digital age.
"[This is] just an indication of how complex copyright law has become," says University of Maryland Professor of Law James Grimmelmann. "[Novelist] Douglas Coupland wonderfully called the computer the 'every animal' machine because it is capable of acting like anything. That is how the Internet works. It can act like a cable system. It can act like a storage device. It's TV. It's radio. It's telephone. It's telegraph. It's everything. That means that a regulatory system that treats these different media differently is going to throw up its hands in confusion when it hits the Internet."
"Whatever happens to Aereo the industry from now on is going to be forced to move forward and innovate," says Aereo CEO Chet Kanojia. "[We] didn't cause this change. The change has been brewing since the Internet started moving bits around."
Produced by Meredith Bragg. Camera by Bragg and Jim Epstein.
About 6 minutes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wouldn't it be easier to bring the internet to heel with regulations than to revisit and rework copyright laws to bring them up to date with the internet age and its developing technologies?
What I found even more alarming was the opinion that over-the-air television should be done-away with, and the broadcast spectrum "reclaimed" by the government. The government already reclaimed a bunch of frequencies when they forced broadcasters into digital, and sold off the bandwidth to cell phone providers. If they are going to eliminate OTA, they need to reinstate licensing for low power television stations for public use (aka public access), since the government should not have complete control over the electromagnetic spectrum.
Get ready folks, Block Insane Yomomma is about to use unilateral executive authority to try to destroy the coal industry in the name of nonexistent manmade climate change.
This move will cost an enormous number of jobs and devastate entire regions of the country. Impeach this fucking bastard already, congress.
In order to impeach Obumbles congress would have to A) not be on board with his agenda and B) have some balls.
Looks like we are gonna have to ride out the rest of that POS's term.
"If it succeeds in death by regulation, we'll all be paying a lot more money for electricity ? if we can get it. Our pocketbook will be lighter, but our country will be darker."
I wish this were hyperbole. EPA already has regulated away coal-fired power plants in the northeast as of 1/1/15 that they know will be needed even if weather if very normal next year. Without them, blackouts could become common, or maybe even massive.
I'll be waiting for this prog derp to harm actual people ...it could reset the derpitude, if we are lucky.
Free Murkut failyyyyyeeeeerrrrr.
"If it succeeds in death by regulation, we'll all be paying a lot more money for electricity ? if we can get it. Our pocketbook will be lighter, but our country will be darker."
This applies in principle to every goddamn thing he has done since he moved into the white house.
"But a low-carbon, clean-energy economy can be an engine of growth for decades to come. America will build that engine. America will build the future, a future that's cleaner, more prosperous and full of good jobs."
There are so many applicable Bastiat essays, I don't know which one to link.
"Under my plan electricity rates will necessarily skyrocket".
Well, at least that's one thing the fucker was honest about.
"Under my plan electricity rates will necessarily skyrocket".
Well, at least that's one thing the fucker was honest about.
Just wait until the peasants scream bloody murder because they can't pay their electric bills. But wait! Our most presidential hero will be there to save them! Subsidies for all making less than 80k per year, courtesy of the already overburdened tax payers, who also cannot pay their electric bill and eat also, but are not eligible for subsidies because they are filthy rich one percenters making more than 80k. So, we're going to need a new agency to handle this, and a czar of course. And dear leader knows just the person for the job, I'm sure.
Block Insane Yomomma
This is the dumbest Obama-mocking nickname in existence. Please give it up.
Second.
Third. It's embarrassing.
Carl from the future.
qu?druplo!
Isn't that a Milton-Price board game?
Yomomma/Obama - Aside from a brief revival in the mid-to-late 90s, "Yo Momma" hasn't been funny since the tag end of the Baby Boom.
Insane/Hussein - not a whole lot one can do with the name Hussein.
Block/Barack - it sounds similar, but what does it mean? Put it this way: you can mockingly call Clinton "Slick Willie". You can mockingly call Bush "Dubya". But try calling Obama "Block" and who's going to get that?
I also vote "no" on Block Insane Yomomma.
Why can't he throw nuclear a bone? I guess he doesn't have enough cronies in the industry.
Didn't his administration grant some licenses for new nuke plants recently, the first ones in like thirty years?
Haven't you heard? "Nuclear" is a scary word because of the millions (or dozens, whatever) that died due to Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Using Executive Powers, that he just made up as King, Obama Begins His Last Big Push on Climate Policy
Oncrack insane whitemomma.
Whoinsane Obumbles
This story makes a fundamental factual mistake.
The Copyright Act does not require retransmission fees. In fact, it actually grants cable systems a compulsory license for retransmission of broadcast television stations.
There is no royalty for retransmission within a station's local market (as Aereo does), because the rightsholders have already been compensated for the broadcast of their works within that market. So even if Aereo were a cable system (and it qualifies, if its transmissions are actually public performances), it would be required to pay only minimum regulatory filing fees to enjoy the benefit of the statutory license.
Retransmission fees are negotiated under the completely separate Communications Act (Title 47), as amended by the 1992 Cable Act. Retransmission fees are paid directly to broadcasters (not copyright rightsholders), independent of any copyright considerations.
Aereo does not qualify as either an cable system or an MVPD under Title 47 definitions, and as such, even if Aereo's transmissions were public performances, that would not require Aereo to pay retransmission fees.
The broadcasters and their supporters have intentionally conflated the issues of copyright infringement and retransmission fees. It's unfortunate that Reason has perpetuated their misleading mischaracterization of the law.
I believe the issue is going to boil down to how the recordings are made available to the customers. Does transmitting the digital recordings outside of the metropolitan market constitute copyright infringement? Everything up to that point is simply hiring someone to operate a rented DVR with a built-in TV tuner for you. If Aereo keeps their servers within that same market, and allows remote-access by customers, I think they've won the case.
"But no matter the outcome, this case underlines just how antiquated and unresponsive our regulatory and copyright framework has become in an increasingly digital age"
No, no it doesn't. If you have an anti-property ax to grind, sure.
Looks like a gimmick to me. That said, I still don't understand the big deal.
This type of intellecual property is such a scam. If you voluntarily broadcast data into the world and I make a copy of it, what harm have I done to you? If I then re-broadcast that data, what harm have I done you?
Start working from home with Google. I make money in my ?p?r? tim?! I have been unemployed f?r months but n?w i m??? up to $100/day on the computer. pop over to this website http://www.Fox81.com
Pravda denounces an enemy of the people:
"...Of course, the government seeks to punish Snowden in order to make an example, but it is an example to future law-breakers (and in particular, those who expose classified information), not to deter future dissenters. Snowden happens to fit into both categories, but most dissenters do not, and they have nothing to fear....
"Surveillance is essential to countering threats from both terrorists and state espionage in the world today. Poitras' concern over the potential for government tyranny is nearly as puzzling: I am confident that the government officials could break into my house, and I am equally confident that they won't. That is because there are laws, and effective oversight that forces officials to comply with those laws. A similar logic applies to the abuse of my data....
"...Snowden wasn't interested in answering to the public. By fleeing, he rejected the very democratic process he claims to defend. And by claiming his trial would be "unfair," he has substituted his own judgment for that of the courts, Congress, and the American people."
http://www.newrepublic.com/art.....ign=buffer
The New Republic has become completely insane.
Example: Is Dracula Untold an Islamophobic Movie?
What evidence do they have? The movie has a negative portrayal of the violent, imperialistic Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II...which is apparently Islamophobic, somehow.
I don't even know what to think of this. Mehmed II was a terrible warlord who conquered wide swaths of Europe and sacked Constantinople, but apparently it's racist to say bad things about him in a Hollywood movie.
TNR in 1955: "Rosa Parks says she isn't getting a fair trial, but it's conclusively established that she broke the law! Orwell would be proud."
Where we live we put the recycles out on Monday nights.
"Over-the-air broadcasts"
?
How much of TV is actually broadcast 'over the air'? Who has an antennae on their TV anymore?
Is what would be 'captured' largely re-transmitted over-the-air major network broadcasts? I assume so. Isn't this also in secular decline?
Apparently not - but as per my suspicion... it *was*
"The value of spectrum used by broadcast TV has been hotly debated in the past couple of years, as the FCC has looked for ways to add spectrum for wireless broadband. Last year FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said the percentage of viewers watching broadcast over the air, rather than through cable or satellite, has fallen to less than 10%, in contrast to the precable-TV days when it was 100%.
...
...In the past 18 months, the number of overall pay-TV subscribers has largely stagnated, after years of steady growth. At the same time, the number of American households wired with only broadband and broadcast TV jumped 23% to 5.1 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared with the year-earlier period, according to a recent Nielsen study.
"It's not a stretch to think that the broadcast business model will outlive that of cable," said National Association of Broadcasters spokesman Dennis Wharton. "The naysayers can talk all they want about broadcasting being a dinosaur.""
* note = that was a 2012 article. but the point was that 'broadcast TV' remains a real thing
Aereo continues to live to fight another day
The statists really got to hate it when that happens.
Statists to their favored cronies:
'Look, we tried to kill that market freedom. We sicced the IRS, the FCC, and ISIS on it! We gave it Ebola and ... it's still alive! '
I'm not falling for this old post.
Mr. Bragg's post has been overtaken by events.
my co-worker's mother makes $71 /hr on the laptop . She has been unemployed for 9 months but last month her payment was $17334 just working on the laptop for a few hours. published here
----------------http://shorx.com/onlineatm
My roomate's aunt makes $71 /hour on the laptop . She has been out of a job for six months but last month her income was $12021 just working on the laptop for a few hours.
You can try this out. ????? http://www.jobsfish.com
my co-worker's mother makes $71 /hr on the laptop . She has been unemployed for 9 months but last month her payment was $17334 just working on the laptop for a few hours. published here
----------------http://shorx.com/onlineatm
my co-worker's mother makes $71 /hr on the laptop . She has been unemployed for 9 months but last month her payment was $17334 just working on the laptop for a few hours. published here
http://shorx.com/onlineatm
Can you have some spare time to sit back in your chair having your laptop with you and making some money online for some interesting online work said Jenny Francis in the party last nightsee more what is for you there to increase your pocket money??.
http://shorx.com/clickforsurvey